<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>super_aj's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.intensedebate.com/users/267365</link>
		<description>Comments by super_aj</description>
<item>
<title>Very Aware : CATFISH: Real or Fake? It's a fake...sort of.</title>
<link>http://veryaware.com/2010/09/catfish-real-or-fake-its-a-fake-sort-of/#IDComment99635178</link>
<description>Why write this article? Who cares if it&amp;#039;s real or not? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 16:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://veryaware.com/2010/09/catfish-real-or-fake-its-a-fake-sort-of/#IDComment99635178</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Very Aware : THE DARK TOWER is going to be huge</title>
<link>http://veryaware.com/2010/09/the-dark-tower-is-going-to-be-huge/#IDComment97743380</link>
<description>Holy snap pops! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Sep 2010 03:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://veryaware.com/2010/09/the-dark-tower-is-going-to-be-huge/#IDComment97743380</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Very Aware : James Cameron vs PIRANHA 3D and why he is wrong</title>
<link>http://veryaware.com/2010/08/james-cameron-vs-piranha-3d-and-why-he-is-wrong/#IDComment96216944</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m going to have to disagree with just about everything you wrote. It wasn&amp;#039;t Cameron&amp;#039;s idea to re-release Avatar. It was the studio&amp;#039;s. Also, I agree with him. He&amp;#039;s trying to make modern 3d a legitimate cinema revolution. Piranha 3D is using it as a gimmick for laughs. Toy Story 3&amp;#039;s 3d was so masterfully crafted that it felt subtle and smooth, so it was not a &amp;quot;joke&amp;quot;. When you are able to watch a movie in 3d and you stop noticing it. That&amp;#039;s when it&amp;#039;s really good. Because it&amp;#039;s not doing something gimmicky and it&amp;#039;s not straining your eyes. It&amp;#039;s supposed to act as another layer of immersion into the film world. Of course ticket prices are gonna be higher, It&amp;#039;s because 3D isn&amp;#039;t the industry standard for film releases. When sound first came out the theaters charged more money knowing full well that people would pay more for it. The same thing is happening with modern 3D (which is still in it&amp;#039;s infancy) With the advent of glasses-free 3D technology approaching, it&amp;#039;s only a matter of time before we can enjoy glasses free 3D entertainment and take it for granted like we do with Sound now-a-days. Cameron makes a great point. We need movies that are released to hit the theaters that take 3D seriously and treat it with respect (not Piranha or Resident Evil, but movies like Tron and Avatar) Cameron ripped on Clash of the Titans for post-converting because he knows that movies like those will leave a bad taste in the audiences mouth and may end up tarnishing the public opinion of modern 3D. I think that until Hollywood gets its shit together and starts treating the technology with respect/ without cutting corners, the technology won&amp;#039;t be able to truly evolve into what it has potential to become. That&amp;#039;s why I think this article is wrong. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://veryaware.com/2010/08/james-cameron-vs-piranha-3d-and-why-he-is-wrong/#IDComment96216944</guid>
</item><item>
<title>We Are Movie Geeks : Ivan Reitman Confirms GHOSTBUSTERS 3 On His Plate</title>
<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2010/01/ivan-reitman-confirms-ghostbusters-3-on-his-plate/#IDComment51895580</link>
<description>I think Sam Raimi would be an awesome director for a ghost busters movie, but I&amp;#039;m cool with Ivan doing it again, it is his series after all. I just hope its better than GB2. Not a bad movie, but not great either. If its better than 2 I&amp;#039;ll be content. I have faith in the writers and the crew thus far.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2010/01/ivan-reitman-confirms-ghostbusters-3-on-his-plate/#IDComment51895580</guid>
</item><item>
<title>We Are Movie Geeks : What is CLASH OF THE TITANS Without a Muse?</title>
<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2010/01/what-is-clash-of-the-titans-without-a-muse/#IDComment51049044</link>
<description>Muse scoring this movie would be a dream come true.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2010/01/what-is-clash-of-the-titans-without-a-muse/#IDComment51049044</guid>
</item><item>
<title>We Are Movie Geeks : Review: LEAP YEAR</title>
<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2010/01/review-leap-year/#IDComment51046723</link>
<description>Why is he an idiot? I don&amp;#039;t see any valid evidence for your argument. Is it because he gave a bad movie a bad review?  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2010/01/review-leap-year/#IDComment51046723</guid>
</item><item>
<title>We Are Movie Geeks : AniMania: ICHI Review</title>
<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2010/01/animania-ichi-review/#IDComment51042465</link>
<description>What&amp;#039;s your rating out of five? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2010/01/animania-ichi-review/#IDComment51042465</guid>
</item><item>
<title>We Are Movie Geeks : Top Ten Tuesday: Most Anticipated Films of 2010</title>
<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2010/01/top-ten-tuesday-most-anticipated-films-of-2010/#IDComment50505357</link>
<description>Good list, I wouldn&amp;#039;t have put Legion on there though. It doesn&amp;#039;t look that good, Plus, Scott Pilgrim should be up in the top three. It will be the surprise hit of 2010, no doubt about it. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Jan 2010 18:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2010/01/top-ten-tuesday-most-anticipated-films-of-2010/#IDComment50505357</guid>
</item><item>
<title>We Are Movie Geeks : A first-time Sundancer's guide to... Sundance.</title>
<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2010/01/a-first-time-sundancers-guide-to-sundance/#IDComment50505037</link>
<description>This is actually really helpful, thanks buddy! :D  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Jan 2010 18:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2010/01/a-first-time-sundancers-guide-to-sundance/#IDComment50505037</guid>
</item><item>
<title>We Are Movie Geeks : AMPAS Music Branch Rules Out WILD THINGS, LOVELY BONES, CRAZY HEART Scores</title>
<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2010/01/ampas-music-branch-rules-out-wild-things-lovely-bones-crazy-heart-scores/#IDComment50423738</link>
<description>This is crazy. It seems the Academy is great at flubbing the best score category every year. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Jan 2010 05:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2010/01/ampas-music-branch-rules-out-wild-things-lovely-bones-crazy-heart-scores/#IDComment50423738</guid>
</item><item>
<title>We Are Movie Geeks : 23 Movies Worth Saving (From the First 23 Years of My Life)</title>
<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2010/01/23-movies-worth-saving-from-the-first-23-years-of-my-life/#IDComment50423549</link>
<description>Awesome list Travis. I&amp;#039;m glad Jurassic Park is in your list. Made my day.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Jan 2010 05:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2010/01/23-movies-worth-saving-from-the-first-23-years-of-my-life/#IDComment50423549</guid>
</item><item>
<title>We Are Movie Geeks : 23 Movies Worth Saving (From the First 23 Years of My Life)</title>
<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2010/01/23-movies-worth-saving-from-the-first-23-years-of-my-life/#IDComment50423444</link>
<description>Travis FTW!  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Jan 2010 05:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2010/01/23-movies-worth-saving-from-the-first-23-years-of-my-life/#IDComment50423444</guid>
</item><item>
<title>We Are Movie Geeks : Kirk's Top 10 of 2009</title>
<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2010/01/kirks-top-10-of-2009/#IDComment50024649</link>
<description>Dude, when I saw 2012 I almost digitally punched you in the face. I love this list, with the exception of A Serious Man and Away We Go, but that&amp;#039;s only because I haven&amp;#039;t seen them. Oh! and I&amp;#039;m dying to see The Cove!  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Jan 2010 05:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2010/01/kirks-top-10-of-2009/#IDComment50024649</guid>
</item><item>
<title>We Are Movie Geeks : Review: AVATAR</title>
<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/12/review-avatar/#IDComment48706593</link>
<description>Those who Can, do. Those who can&amp;#039;t, whine about those who can. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/12/review-avatar/#IDComment48706593</guid>
</item><item>
<title>We Are Movie Geeks : ZOMBIELAND 3-D is a Lose/Lose Situation</title>
<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/11/zombieland-3-d-is-a-loselose-situation/#IDComment44685953</link>
<description>They won&amp;#039;t leave it alone, because they made lots of money off of Zombieland, which according to hollywood logic, means they are guaranteed money with a sequel.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/11/zombieland-3-d-is-a-loselose-situation/#IDComment44685953</guid>
</item><item>
<title>We Are Movie Geeks : New PERCY JACKSON Trailer As Long As Its Title</title>
<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/11/new-percy-jackson-trailer-as-long-as-its-title/#IDComment44685791</link>
<description>well I guess I&amp;#039;ve got my mind made up for me. I&amp;#039;ll have to read at least the first one before the movie comes out. I&amp;#039;ve been looking for a new series to read too! Thanks guys. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/11/new-percy-jackson-trailer-as-long-as-its-title/#IDComment44685791</guid>
</item><item>
<title>We Are Movie Geeks : New PERCY JACKSON Trailer As Long As Its Title</title>
<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/11/new-percy-jackson-trailer-as-long-as-its-title/#IDComment44650394</link>
<description>Never read the books. But this movie looks crazy fun! </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/11/new-percy-jackson-trailer-as-long-as-its-title/#IDComment44650394</guid>
</item><item>
<title>We Are Movie Geeks : UP For Your Consideration</title>
<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/11/up-for-your-consideration/#IDComment43967311</link>
<description>Not only does it deserve a nom, UP and Pixar deserve the win. Wall-e was the highest reviewed movie of 08 and was somehow left out of the nominees for best picture. Pixar got hosed. Once again they have the best reviewed movie of the year, which in my opinion means its the best movie of the year, which is why it deserves Best Picture. I think its time animated films are treated with the same amount of respect as live action films.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/11/up-for-your-consideration/#IDComment43967311</guid>
</item><item>
<title>We Are Movie Geeks : Top Ten Tuesday: The Worst Vampires in Film History</title>
<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/11/top-ten-tuesday-the-worst-vampires-in-film-history/#IDComment43966528</link>
<description>I like this list, at first I didn&amp;#039;t see the title &amp;quot;Worst&amp;quot; and I scrolled through the list thinking the vampires listed were the best ones (most top ten lists do that here at wamg) And was greatly relieved when I went back to the top to see that the Worst vampires are listed, oh thank god! I got to the bottom and saw Edward Cullen and knew something was afoot. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/11/top-ten-tuesday-the-worst-vampires-in-film-history/#IDComment43966528</guid>
</item><item>
<title>We Are Movie Geeks : Poster for CRAZY HEART looks very dude-ish</title>
<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/11/poster-for-crazy-heart-looks-very-dude-ish/#IDComment43476324</link>
<description>just this poster makes me want to see this movie. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/11/poster-for-crazy-heart-looks-very-dude-ish/#IDComment43476324</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>
