<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/89503</link>
		<description>Comments by smilbandit</description>
<item>
<title>Marshall&#039;s Web Tool Blog : Three Useful Research Tactics I Learned Last Week</title>
<link>http://marshallk.com/three-useful-research-tactics-i-learned-last-week#IDComment14183517</link>
<description>Sounds like your twellow tip could be mashed up with the crunchbase api.  Maybe i&amp;#039;ll play with that. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://marshallk.com/three-useful-research-tactics-i-learned-last-week#IDComment14183517</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Feld Thoughts : Enterprise RSS at NewsGator is Alive and Well</title>
<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2009/01/enterprise-rss-at-newsgator-is-alive-and-well.html#IDComment13946414</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t see that you can say RSS can be profitable any more that saying HTTP or HTML can be profitable.  It seems to me that it&amp;#039;s not RSS that&amp;#039;s made Newsgator Enterprise products sell, but the features and layers of value they placed on top of RSS.  If you click on Enterprise RSS on Newsgators site, &amp;quot;RSS Subscriptions &amp;amp; Notifications&amp;quot; is one of ten features that the newsgators products list.  I&amp;#039;m sure the back end of most of those features is RSS but it&amp;#039;s the functional value that has been layered on top that is being sold. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2009/01/enterprise-rss-at-newsgator-is-alive-and-well.html#IDComment13946414</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>