senorlechero

senorlechero

65p

129 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0

1 week ago @ Breitbart.com - Hackers deface website... · 0 replies · +1 points

The ignorance of claiming Manning "risked his life" when all he did was push buttons on a keyboard while mast r bating over photos of Assange is astounding. Wuterich actually risked his life in an attempt to catch or kill the terrorists who blew up marines. Only leftist idiots could conflate bravery with cowardice.

The FBI and CIA have done nothing about these hackers. My guess is that the O and his puppet Attorney General like the leaks. The military should launch their own investigation and when they find these guys make them disappear.

1 week ago @ Big Journalism - Politico Hides Media M... · 0 replies · +6 points

Tasing? Is that all? I was happy to see one especially idiotic protestor hit in the head with a brick (thrown by other protestors...but blamed on police), and would be very happy to see more protestors beaten with batons or shot for their every escalatin crimes

1 week ago @ Breitbart.com - UN chief urges Israel ... · 0 replies · +3 points

The palestinians submitted "4 page documents" on "borders and security". Wow, that demonstrates quite an effort toward peace. Most likely they cut the map of "Palestine" from the pages of a textbook...a map that shows all of Israel being "Palestine", and a plan for security that shows Israelis leaving the middle east completely.

Meanwhile the Israelis are releasing terrorists from jail and providing food, fuel, and energy to Gaza...and for what?

2 weeks ago @ Breitbart.tv - Finger-Wag Flashback: ... · 0 replies · +3 points

Wow, thanks for the reminder of what it was like to have a real man in the White House. I miss President Bush

2 weeks ago @ Big Government - White House/DOJ Workin... · 0 replies · +3 points

What total horsekrap! You must be an occuptard, because only they make such ignorant comments. "Work hard to limit early voting, absentee ballots, and voter registration drives". Really? And that's why Republicans vote absentee and mail in in larger numbers than dems?

Gotta love your id...the NOT droid....as you robotically spew out ACORN talking points that are as worn out as your crack pipe.

2 weeks ago @ Big Government - White House/DOJ Workin... · 0 replies · +3 points

I'm with you. I have said for years that SF and LA should be carved out of CA and a new state created....name it Left California. They could be as fruity and nutty as they want. They could paint themselves with rainbows and sing Kumbayah while smoking crack with their union reps. The rest of us could get back to normal and resume business as a productive part of the USofA

2 weeks ago @ Big Government - White House/DOJ Workin... · 1 reply · +1 points

That is a ridiculous statement. Gerrymandering is a political process managed by the party in power, but it is not "legal voter fraud". First of all, voter fraud deals with votes....gerrymandering deals with creating districts. Second, there is no better way to draw district lines (at least not yet there isn't). "Non-partisan" commissions are full of partisans who claim not to be. Judges are usually appointed by partisans and are mostly partisans themselves.

What other way is there to draw new district lines?

2 weeks ago @ Big Government - Mitch Daniels Responds... · 9 replies · +5 points

A trillion dollars in stimulus funds for starters...and that has carried into each new years budget

What do your democrat talking points tell you to say now little man?

2 weeks ago @ Big Government - Mitch Daniels Responds... · 0 replies · +2 points

No, Mitt should not pay more than 15% in taxes, because his income was all from capital gains....you do know what that means...right? If investement income is taxed at a higher rate than it is now less will be invested, and that means less jobs.

Romney's (and Buffet's) money is working to create jobs. It is also invested at great risk of loss.

If they earned wages of millions of dollars that is taxed at a higher rate, but they don't

2 weeks ago @ Big Government - Mitch Daniels Responds... · 0 replies · +2 points

WRONG! It was "inacted into law" to help the needy. When it was inacted there were about 20 people paying into it for every person who took out. The law never envisioned it as a "retirement savings program". What baloney