John McGlone
12p8 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
76 weeks ago @ J.P. Mc-G - We just aren't quite t... · 0 replies · +1 points
Lol, I'm hardly a scientist. I'm a programmer who writes iPhone Applications :P Fun stuff.
If I could offer any advice, though, it's don't try to slander people on public forums. Message the guy privately, it's not nice to start posting things about his private life where anybody can read it.
I hope all is well in life with you, and I hope whatever is going on with Dr. McGlone gets resolved for ya!
If I could offer any advice, though, it's don't try to slander people on public forums. Message the guy privately, it's not nice to start posting things about his private life where anybody can read it.
I hope all is well in life with you, and I hope whatever is going on with Dr. McGlone gets resolved for ya!
76 weeks ago @ J.P. Mc-G - We just aren't quite t... · 0 replies · +1 points
I'm sorry I don't know who you are and I think you have the wrong person. I never left anybody for anybody, especially not a massage slut.
118 weeks ago @ J.P. Mc-G - "God does not exist" v... · 0 replies · +1 points
Allow me to dissect your reply and generalize on some of your comments.
"You should probably try and remember this argument the next time you see a cloud or a baby being born."
I'm not sure how this particular argument would help in that case, because this was about whether one can say "there is no god" as a scientific claim with 100% certainty, not about the emotions brought about from seeing beautiful things in nature, or receiving a gift as amazing as a baby. :)
"Check out the 'perfect' timing of the stars or see how a bumble bee flies."
This can be explained through science, and it makes sense as to why or how we perceive these things as fascinating. Don't get me wrong, nature is definitely MUCH MUCH bigger than us, and we may never understand everything about how, or more importantly why, things are... but to jump to the conclusion that the christian god did it makes as much sense as the conclusion that the hindu gods, or ancient greek gods, or the muslim god did it.
"Perhaps your proof will come when or if you ever have need of a miracle and you receive it."
I believe everything happens from previous events. Just because you survive something against "all odds", does not mean it was a miracle. Normally, these things can be explained. And normally, theists and atheists will agree on the explanation, except that theists will add "God aligned the circumstances to happen that way."
"Have you ever been in a prayer meeting and someone manifests holy spirit?"
No.
"Why do you limit yourself on your knowledge alone?"
I don't. Perhaps I should attend one of these prayer meetings.
"This is a much bigger world and universe(s) than just that. "
Agreed. I never claimed that we (humans) are the biggest thing, but the conclusion of a God just simply makes no sense when compared to how we draw conclusions on everything else.
"No offense to you but you will never find the proof you are not looking for because you are not looking for the answer, you are looking for your answer."
Did you reply to the right post? Not to be rude, but the only answer I was looking for in this post was on which statement of the 2 in the title is more correct, or should be more accepted.
All in all, thanks for the reply. How'd you find my site? I'd like to know which references are actually working.
"You should probably try and remember this argument the next time you see a cloud or a baby being born."
I'm not sure how this particular argument would help in that case, because this was about whether one can say "there is no god" as a scientific claim with 100% certainty, not about the emotions brought about from seeing beautiful things in nature, or receiving a gift as amazing as a baby. :)
"Check out the 'perfect' timing of the stars or see how a bumble bee flies."
This can be explained through science, and it makes sense as to why or how we perceive these things as fascinating. Don't get me wrong, nature is definitely MUCH MUCH bigger than us, and we may never understand everything about how, or more importantly why, things are... but to jump to the conclusion that the christian god did it makes as much sense as the conclusion that the hindu gods, or ancient greek gods, or the muslim god did it.
"Perhaps your proof will come when or if you ever have need of a miracle and you receive it."
I believe everything happens from previous events. Just because you survive something against "all odds", does not mean it was a miracle. Normally, these things can be explained. And normally, theists and atheists will agree on the explanation, except that theists will add "God aligned the circumstances to happen that way."
"Have you ever been in a prayer meeting and someone manifests holy spirit?"
No.
"Why do you limit yourself on your knowledge alone?"
I don't. Perhaps I should attend one of these prayer meetings.
"This is a much bigger world and universe(s) than just that. "
Agreed. I never claimed that we (humans) are the biggest thing, but the conclusion of a God just simply makes no sense when compared to how we draw conclusions on everything else.
"No offense to you but you will never find the proof you are not looking for because you are not looking for the answer, you are looking for your answer."
Did you reply to the right post? Not to be rude, but the only answer I was looking for in this post was on which statement of the 2 in the title is more correct, or should be more accepted.
All in all, thanks for the reply. How'd you find my site? I'd like to know which references are actually working.
125 weeks ago @ J.P. Mc-G - To those of you receiv... · 0 replies · +1 points
Thanks, that's now what I'll be listening to as I work today (:
125 weeks ago @ Austin News, Weather, ... - Group asks God for rai... · 0 replies · +1 points
... what an article... I asked god to help me sleep, and guess what, 3 hours later, I fell to sleep! -_- I can't believe this stuff is even remotely believable to anybody anymore
125 weeks ago @ J.P. Mc-G - This fat flamboyant is... · 0 replies · +1 points
haha, probably
125 weeks ago @ J.P. Mc-G - This fat flamboyant is... · 2 replies · +1 points
lol I find it entertaining AND awkward. What if he was in your room with you and dancing like that? Maybe being a woman it wouldn't phase you, but I'd be pissing myself laughing while looking for the door :P
Contraption