<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>rvastar's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.intensedebate.com/users/340709</link>
		<description>Comments by rvastar</description>
<item>
<title>Big Hollywood : 2011 Best Picture Nomination Countdown: #6 â âTrue Grit'</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/02/21/2011-best-picture-nomination-countdown-6-true-grit/#IDComment129726142</link>
<description>[Mattie and Rooster and LeBeouf are interesting characters played well by the actors who inhabit them, but there&amp;rsquo;s no real depth there. ]   Sorry but I have to disagree entirely.  I thought that the Coen Brothers did an excellent job at slowly revealing the depth of the characters involved.  Three scenes in particular encapsulate this view for me.   1) LeBeouf&amp;#039;s kill shot that saved Rooster.  This was the culmination of the slowly-evolving respect between the two lawmen, where Rooster finally saw through LeBeouf&amp;#039;s braggadocio to see the skilled, dedicated lawman that he was.  And after all his previous yammering, LeBeouf&amp;#039;s humility in the face of Rooster&amp;#039;s praise was revealing.   2) The shooting of Little Blackie.  Although Mattie was tough as nails in many ways, she was still a child and her screaming for Rooster not to shoot the horse she had come to love beautifully potrayed the small amount of innocence that was left in her.  Opposingly, Rooster&amp;#039;s complete lack of hesitation in putting down Little Blackie also perfectly portrayed the no-nonsense, harsh realities of the time - it was no place for the timid and sentimental.  Sadly, you get the feeling that Rooster&amp;#039;s bullet not only killed the horse, but that it also killed any traces of the little girl left in Mattie.   3) Rooster&amp;#039;s ride to save Mattie.  Rooster pretty much exemplified all of the traits that you found in the evil men he opposed: gluttonous, greedy, arrogant, quick to kill...but with one, glaring difference.  He still had a conscience.  His frantic ride to save Mattie, followed by an agonizing run across the landscape, poignantly showed that in his heart of hearts, Rooster was indeed a good man who could be counted on to do the right thing.   I thoroughly enjoyed it and highly recommend it. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/02/21/2011-best-picture-nomination-countdown-6-true-grit/#IDComment129726142</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Sheryl Crow: A Micro-Manager Who Likes Used Toilet Paper</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/awrhawkins/2010/08/17/sheryl-crow-a-micro-manager-who-likes-used-toilet-paper/#IDComment93700072</link>
<description>An better header for the illustration:  &lt;i&gt;What Would Sheryl Crow Do-Do?&lt;/i&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/awrhawkins/2010/08/17/sheryl-crow-a-micro-manager-who-likes-used-toilet-paper/#IDComment93700072</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Muslim Leaders Abandon Plans for Ground Zero Mosque?</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/16/muslim-leaders-abandon-plans-for-ground-zero-mosque/#IDComment93506616</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;But several people familiar with the debate among New York&amp;rsquo;s Islamic activists now claim that the leaders are convinced abandoning the site is preferable to unleashing a wave of bitterness towards Muslims.  They also hope the move will be seen as a show of sensitivity to families of the victims of the 9/11 attacks, and to the American public generally.&lt;/i&gt;    &amp;quot;Sensitivity&amp;quot; my butt.  The only &amp;quot;wave of bitterness&amp;quot; the Muslims were worried about unleashing was the one that would come crashing down on their useful idiot enablers -i.e, the Democrats - at the ballot box for the next few election cycles. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/16/muslim-leaders-abandon-plans-for-ground-zero-mosque/#IDComment93506616</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Today's Open Thread</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2010/08/08/todays-open-thread-67/#IDComment91750537</link>
<description>Loved this movie.  The scene where Spock basically tells the Vulcan Science Council to go f#ck themselves after they insult his mother is worth the price of admission. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Aug 2010 14:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2010/08/08/todays-open-thread-67/#IDComment91750537</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : I Got My Correction Thanks to the <i>The New York Times</i> -- Now Who's Next?</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/08/03/i-got-my-correction-thanks-to-the-the-new-york-times/#IDComment90808352</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; I guess that would depend on whether it actually happened or not. Since none of us can prove it, it&amp;#039;s all speculation.  &lt;/blockquote&gt;  Wrong.  The video evidence proves that the incident didn&amp;#039;t occur.  You&amp;#039;re just refusing to accept the facts because you&amp;#039;re an intellectually dishonest partisan hack.  Let&amp;#039;s try a hypothetical situation:   A white store owner - well-respected in his community - calls police and states that a black gunman walked into his store, forced him to empty his safe at gunpoint, and escaped with $50K. Later, however, when the police view the store&amp;#039;s security camera footage, as well as video footage from a bank across the street that shows the front of the store, it becomes clear that no one entered the store at the time that the owner claims that he was robbed.  Furthermore, the safe from which the $50K was allegedly stolen is visible in the security camera footage and is clearly never opened by anyone that day, much less by the store owner as he&amp;#039;s being held at gunpoint.  As they investigate further, the police come to learn that the white store owner has a tax debt of $45K and is facing IRS troubles.  Now, which are you going to put your faith in: the store owner&amp;#039;s word or the video footage?    Any answer other than &amp;quot;the video footage&amp;quot; is absurd and only indicates that anyone who would give that answer is doing so out of some distorted emotional need to cover for the store owner or some mental illness that doesn&amp;#039;t allow for logical reasoning.  Reps Carson and Lewis stated that at a specific time, at a specific location, Tea Party members screamed &amp;quot;n!gger&amp;quot; at them at least 15 times.  Breitbart has presented several individual video/audio recordings from that specific location, at that specific time, from different vantage points...and &lt;i&gt;not one of them&lt;/i&gt; managed to capture even a single utterance of the word &amp;quot;n!gger&amp;quot;.    It is blindingly clear as to what the truth is here: namely, that Reps Carson and Lewis are liars - plain and simple.  Their motivation in lying is that they are liberal Democrats who wanted to paint the Tea Parties as racist in an effort to 1) disparage the Tea Parties in the eyes of the American people, which would in turn 2) help the Democrats. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Aug 2010 16:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/08/03/i-got-my-correction-thanks-to-the-the-new-york-times/#IDComment90808352</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : I Got My Correction Thanks to the <i>The New York Times</i> -- Now Who's Next?</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/08/03/i-got-my-correction-thanks-to-the-the-new-york-times/#IDComment90656537</link>
<description>Actually, following his initial whiny, ankle-biting post, he makes some valid, level-headed points.    But to come on to Breitbart&amp;#039;s own Web site and deride him for not doing enough to further the cause is ass-hattery at it&amp;#039;s best.  The funny thing is that he&amp;#039;s no different in temperament than those he rails against like Obama - a snobby, elitist &amp;quot;intellectual&amp;quot; whom we should all thank for being allowed the privilege of basking in his brilliant brilliance.  His attitude is a perfect illustration of the admonition against cutting off your nose to spite your face. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Aug 2010 20:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/08/03/i-got-my-correction-thanks-to-the-the-new-york-times/#IDComment90656537</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : I Got My Correction Thanks to the <i>The New York Times</i> -- Now Who's Next?</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/08/03/i-got-my-correction-thanks-to-the-the-new-york-times/#IDComment90649562</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; I&amp;#039;m sorry. Of course you are right. The sign of the champion debater - one who needs to try liberal distractions because he doesn&amp;#039;t have any real facts to debate.  &lt;/blockquote&gt;  Funny then that you haven&amp;#039;t once denied being a whining, ankle-biting jackass, huh?  Which would infer some level of agreement with the observation...perhaps sub-conscious.    That being the the case, with what - exactly - are you finding fault?  &lt;blockquote&gt; I of course bow to your flawless execution, logic and command of the English language. &lt;/blockquote&gt;  I would take your bowing as a compliment, but seeing as how you probably spend most of your time prostrate in a futile attempt at kissing your own ass, it&amp;#039;s really much ado about nothing.  &lt;blockquote&gt; Remind me when I see you on the street to bow in deference and thank you for not having to resort to actually demonstrating your abilities, only your distractions... &lt;/blockquote&gt;  Oh, I have no interest in demonstrating anything to &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt;.  And thanks to your childish, myopic need for approval and applause, you&amp;#039;re doing an outstanding job of assisting me in demonstrating my point to my actual audience - the other posters.  So thank you and please continue :) </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Aug 2010 19:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/08/03/i-got-my-correction-thanks-to-the-the-new-york-times/#IDComment90649562</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : I Got My Correction Thanks to the <i>The New York Times</i> -- Now Who's Next?</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/08/03/i-got-my-correction-thanks-to-the-the-new-york-times/#IDComment90644861</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; Don&amp;#039;t be angry that you were publicly embarrassed by your betters. &lt;/blockquote&gt;  That would require me to be bested, which hasn&amp;#039;t happened.  You keep harping on a &amp;quot;debate&amp;quot; but you&amp;#039;re missing the central point - that is, that there&amp;#039;s nothing &lt;i&gt;to&lt;/i&gt; debate.    I stated that you&amp;#039;re a whining, ankle-biting jackass...which is precisely what you are.  What is there to debate in that? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Aug 2010 18:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/08/03/i-got-my-correction-thanks-to-the-the-new-york-times/#IDComment90644861</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : I Got My Correction Thanks to the <i>The New York Times</i> -- Now Who's Next?</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/08/03/i-got-my-correction-thanks-to-the-the-new-york-times/#IDComment90642883</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; If you would like to learn how to debate and file complaints I&amp;#039;ll be happy to instruct you. &lt;/blockquote&gt;  No thanks, but here&amp;#039;s a few instructions for you:  1) Find a dictionary.  2) Look up &amp;quot;whiner&amp;quot;.  3) Look up &amp;quot;ankle-biter&amp;quot;.  4) Look up &amp;quot;jackass&amp;quot;.  5) Note your feelings of discomfort.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Aug 2010 18:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/08/03/i-got-my-correction-thanks-to-the-the-new-york-times/#IDComment90642883</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : I Got My Correction Thanks to the <i>The New York Times</i> -- Now Who's Next?</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/08/03/i-got-my-correction-thanks-to-the-the-new-york-times/#IDComment90626264</link>
<description>Wow.  You filed and complaint...and you post on internet forums.    How earth-shattering.  Thanks for letting the Sun come up this morning. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Aug 2010 17:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/08/03/i-got-my-correction-thanks-to-the-the-new-york-times/#IDComment90626264</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : I Got My Correction Thanks to the <i>The New York Times</i> -- Now Who's Next?</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/08/03/i-got-my-correction-thanks-to-the-the-new-york-times/#IDComment90623849</link>
<description>I could care less what I remind you of.  You&amp;#039;re still a whining, ankle-biting jackass.  Tell us, Oh Whining Ankle-Biting Jackass...what is that YOU are doing that outstrips Mr. Breitbart&amp;#039;s efforts at exposing the leftist rats for the public? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Aug 2010 17:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/08/03/i-got-my-correction-thanks-to-the-the-new-york-times/#IDComment90623849</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : I Got My Correction Thanks to the <i>The New York Times</i> -- Now Who's Next?</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/08/03/i-got-my-correction-thanks-to-the-the-new-york-times/#IDComment90623385</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; But the video above does not prove they were not made. That&amp;#039;s all I&amp;#039;m saying.  &lt;/blockquote&gt;  It proves exactly that.  The lying Democrat Congressmen stated racial epitaphs were hurled at them...&lt;i&gt;at the location the video was shot, at the time the video was rolling&lt;/i&gt;.  If people were yelling &amp;quot;n!gger&amp;quot; at them - &lt;i&gt;15 times no less&lt;/i&gt; - then the evidence would be in the recording.  And not only that, there was more than one video recorder there...many more.  Still, no evidence of anyone screaming &amp;quot;n!gger&amp;quot;.  Considering those facts, what is your alternative explanation for the fact that there is no audio to back up the liars claims? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Aug 2010 17:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/08/03/i-got-my-correction-thanks-to-the-the-new-york-times/#IDComment90623385</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : I Got My Correction Thanks to the <i>The New York Times</i> -- Now Who's Next?</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/08/03/i-got-my-correction-thanks-to-the-the-new-york-times/#IDComment90622012</link>
<description>yeah...you are simple. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Aug 2010 17:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/08/03/i-got-my-correction-thanks-to-the-the-new-york-times/#IDComment90622012</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : I Got My Correction Thanks to the <i>The New York Times</i> -- Now Who's Next?</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/08/03/i-got-my-correction-thanks-to-the-the-new-york-times/#IDComment90621879</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; Perhaps that&amp;#039;s misplaced and I should just pray at the feet of the beast like everyone else. &lt;/blockquote&gt;  Maybe.  But what you should most definitely work on first is to stop being an ankle-biting jackass. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Aug 2010 16:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/08/03/i-got-my-correction-thanks-to-the-the-new-york-times/#IDComment90621879</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Worlds Collide: Breitbart Meets Boehlert on 'Good Morning America'</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/21/worlds-collide-breitbart-meets-boehlert-on-good-morning-america/#IDComment87961230</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; If you want to make it the issue of the audience reaction, then Breitbart needed to say this from the beginning. &lt;/blockquote&gt;  I am making an issue of it.  And I&amp;#039;m making a fool of you :)  From Breitbart&amp;#039;s FIRST post regarding this video footage:  &lt;i&gt; In the first video, Sherrod describes how she racially discriminates against a white farmer. She describes how she is torn over how much she will choose to help him. And, she admits that she doesn&amp;rsquo;t do everything she can for him, because he is white. Eventually, her basic humanity informs that this white man is poor and needs help. But she decides that he should get help from &amp;ldquo;one of his own kind&amp;rdquo;. She refers him to a white lawyer.  Sherrod&amp;rsquo;s racist tale &lt;b&gt;is received by the NAACP audience with nodding approval and murmurs of recognition and agreement&lt;/b&gt;. Hardly the behavior of the group now holding itself up as the supreme judge of another groups&amp;rsquo; racial tolerance. &lt;/i&gt;  What&amp;#039;s that group listed there in that second paragraph?  Your turn, troll. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/21/worlds-collide-breitbart-meets-boehlert-on-good-morning-america/#IDComment87961230</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Worlds Collide: Breitbart Meets Boehlert on 'Good Morning America'</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/21/worlds-collide-breitbart-meets-boehlert-on-good-morning-america/#IDComment87960097</link>
<description>Then it should be easy for you to pick a site that&amp;#039;s hosting the video and give us a time-stamp where she indicates that she ended up NOT discriminating against the white farmer.  Same goes for a time-stamp on the audience booing or reprimanding her.  Anytime now, troll. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/21/worlds-collide-breitbart-meets-boehlert-on-good-morning-america/#IDComment87960097</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Worlds Collide: Breitbart Meets Boehlert on 'Good Morning America'</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/21/worlds-collide-breitbart-meets-boehlert-on-good-morning-america/#IDComment87953679</link>
<description>Had a chance to come up with the time-stamp in the tape where she was booed or reprimanded by the audience in attendance for her discriminatory actions?  Come on, troll.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/21/worlds-collide-breitbart-meets-boehlert-on-good-morning-america/#IDComment87953679</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Worlds Collide: Breitbart Meets Boehlert on 'Good Morning America'</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/21/worlds-collide-breitbart-meets-boehlert-on-good-morning-america/#IDComment87950579</link>
<description>Anytime you want to give us the time-stamp of the point in the unedited tape where Sherrod indicates that she was just kidding about having discriminated against that white farmer, please do.  We&amp;#039;re waiting, troll. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/21/worlds-collide-breitbart-meets-boehlert-on-good-morning-america/#IDComment87950579</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Worlds Collide: Breitbart Meets Boehlert on 'Good Morning America'</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/21/worlds-collide-breitbart-meets-boehlert-on-good-morning-america/#IDComment87950532</link>
<description>Anytime you want to give us the time-stamp of the point in the unedited tape where Sherrod indicates that she was just kidding about having discriminated against that white farmer, please do.  We&amp;#039;re waiting, troll. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/21/worlds-collide-breitbart-meets-boehlert-on-good-morning-america/#IDComment87950532</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Worlds Collide: Breitbart Meets Boehlert on 'Good Morning America'</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/21/worlds-collide-breitbart-meets-boehlert-on-good-morning-america/#IDComment87950027</link>
<description>Breitbart understands something that our cowardly Republican beltway class doesn&amp;#039;t: namely, if you&amp;#039;re not on offense, you&amp;#039;re on defense, and as such, you are always at a tactical disadvantage because you&amp;#039;re never in a position to act, only to &lt;i&gt;react&lt;/i&gt;.  That&amp;#039;s we&amp;#039;ve been doing for 60 years: letting the Left own the offensive arena while we sit back on our heels, fighting the onslaught.  &lt;b&gt;NO MORE!!!&lt;/b&gt;  Here&amp;#039;s to Andrew Breitbart...may he continue to punch these Leftists hacks&amp;#039; teeth down their throats :) </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/21/worlds-collide-breitbart-meets-boehlert-on-good-morning-america/#IDComment87950027</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>
