<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>rjcylon's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.intensedebate.com/users/709724</link>
		<description>Comments by rjcylon</description>
<item>
<title>Big Hollywood : 'Star Wars: Episode One - The Phantom Menace 3D' Review: Jar Jar Aside, Prequel Still Has Merit</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhanlon/2012/02/13/star-wars-episode-one-the-phantom-menace-3d-review-jar-jar-aside-prequel-still-has-merit/#IDComment292703107</link>
<description>Wow what a bunch of losers, giving negative reps to an innocuous star wars post.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhanlon/2012/02/13/star-wars-episode-one-the-phantom-menace-3d-review-jar-jar-aside-prequel-still-has-merit/#IDComment292703107</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : 'Star Wars: Episode One - The Phantom Menace 3D' Review: Jar Jar Aside, Prequel Still Has Merit</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhanlon/2012/02/13/star-wars-episode-one-the-phantom-menace-3d-review-jar-jar-aside-prequel-still-has-merit/#IDComment291915832</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;ll see it in 3D this weekend. So much time has passed that hard core Star Wars fans can finally be objective about the prequels. In my opinion, Phantom Menace actually holds up very well as a film. It&amp;#039;s not fantastic, but it&amp;#039;s good. The problem is it is a pretty good film with some absolute cringe-worthy lines of dialogue and it most likely isn&amp;#039;t the film fans wanted after such a long period after ROTJ, but it holds up well and I watch it again every year or so.    Attack of the Clones is much better overall but it has scenes and dialogue that make Phantom Menace look like Oscar material. Sith is better than both overall, but the truly bad moments kind of make you forget.   You take all three prequels together, grit your teeth when necessary and you have one very good Star Wars movie. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhanlon/2012/02/13/star-wars-episode-one-the-phantom-menace-3d-review-jar-jar-aside-prequel-still-has-merit/#IDComment291915832</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : The View: Walters Defends Santorum, Behar Calls Him 'Coward'</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/the-view-walters-defends-santorum-behar-calls-him-coward/#IDComment291908381</link>
<description>Well, all I know is that the term &amp;quot;stay at home mom&amp;quot; is often said as an insult.  And the reason that mom &amp;quot;has to work&amp;quot; is because of our tax burden. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/the-view-walters-defends-santorum-behar-calls-him-coward/#IDComment291908381</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Breitbart Confronts Occupy Thugs At Conservative Conference</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-confronts-occupy-thugs-at-cpac-conference/#IDComment290109085</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;ll keep that in mind next time your friends attack old people/rape fellow occupiers/attack police/throw rocks through windows. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-confronts-occupy-thugs-at-cpac-conference/#IDComment290109085</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Breitbart Confronts Occupy Thugs At Conservative Conference</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-confronts-occupy-thugs-at-cpac-conference/#IDComment290107059</link>
<description>The difference is he&amp;#039;s the first conservative with a national media spotlight who had the balls to do it. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-confronts-occupy-thugs-at-cpac-conference/#IDComment290107059</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Study: Distrust Of Government A Mental Disorder</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/study-distrust-of-government-a-mental-disorder/#IDComment288448108</link>
<description>Just in time for Obamacare and &amp;quot;mandatory treatment of Anti-Government Phobia&amp;quot;.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/study-distrust-of-government-a-mental-disorder/#IDComment288448108</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : #OccupyDC Denies Unlawful Plans For CPAC Protest</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/occupydc-denies-unlawful-plans-for-cpac-protest/#IDComment287571336</link>
<description>I think that except for the planned assaults, their demonstration will be otherwise peaceful. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 03:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/occupydc-denies-unlawful-plans-for-cpac-protest/#IDComment287571336</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Rick Rolls</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/its-rick/#IDComment286856317</link>
<description>Look... I like Santorum. I really do. I would vote for this man in a HEART BEAT.       But the only reason he&amp;#039;s gotten to where he is, is because Romney hasn&amp;#039;t focused his millions on destroying him (yet).       Newt has been the unfortunate recipient of all that negative campaign money. If the time comes that Newt is no longer in the game, and Santorum is the victim of all those ads, his numbers will go down too.      Newt is the one that can still pull this off. As much as I like Santorum, he&amp;#039;s in the Ron Paul category. A lot of enthusiastic supporters, a very small chance of making  a real impact.      Newt needs us now more than ever. Vote Newt--until Palin jumps in (as an independent. If the Republican Party must be replaced, then might as well be the Tea Party. Already has &amp;quot;Party&amp;quot; in the title.) </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2012 07:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/its-rick/#IDComment286856317</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Matthews: Obama Birth Control Mandate 'Frightening'</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/matthews-obama-birth-control-mandate-frightening/#IDComment286680159</link>
<description> Everything Obama does is frightening.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2012 02:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/matthews-obama-birth-control-mandate-frightening/#IDComment286680159</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Matthews: Obama Birth Control Mandate 'Frightening'</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/matthews-obama-birth-control-mandate-frightening/#IDComment286679758</link>
<description>yes I&amp;#039;ve seen this many times. He has a period of lucidity then drifts back into his Obama induced fog and is even worse than before he had his lucid moment.    </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2012 02:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/matthews-obama-birth-control-mandate-frightening/#IDComment286679758</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Matthews Swoons Over Obama's Smile</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/matthews-swoons-over-obamas-smile/#IDComment286284737</link>
<description>Don&amp;#039;t forget the crease in his pants. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Feb 2012 15:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/matthews-swoons-over-obamas-smile/#IDComment286284737</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : 'I Deserve A Second Term'</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/i-deserve-a-second-term/#IDComment285840633</link>
<description>Well Mr. Obama as a retired man you COULD put in more time on the golf course. I know you&amp;#039;re pretty generous with the golf in your current schedule, but doesn&amp;#039;t even MORE sound like fun? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Feb 2012 02:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/i-deserve-a-second-term/#IDComment285840633</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Government Employee Unions Raising Hell in Arizona</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/tensions-rise-between-jan-brewer-and-arizona-union-leaders/#IDComment282894430</link>
<description>Typical liberal, eloquent and wise.   (sarc) </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 15:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/tensions-rise-between-jan-brewer-and-arizona-union-leaders/#IDComment282894430</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Jobless Rate Falls To 8.3%</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/jobless-rate-falls-to-8-3/#IDComment282893582</link>
<description>In what world is two tenths of a percent significant? I&amp;#039;m glad more people are working but it&amp;#039;s a) basically meaningless and b) probably fake. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 15:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/jobless-rate-falls-to-8-3/#IDComment282893582</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Occupiers vs. The Constitution</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/occupiers-vs-the-constitution/#IDComment277147240</link>
<description>50 people in Congress. One for each state. What is hilarious is the conviction she says it with, like to not know that makes you stupid. Love it. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/occupiers-vs-the-constitution/#IDComment277147240</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Maher: 'Who The F**k Is Saul Alinsky?' </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/maher-who-the-fk-is-saul-alinsky/#IDComment277145913</link>
<description>Before another democrat blames Sarah Palin for the actions of a violent schizophrenic... </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/maher-who-the-fk-is-saul-alinsky/#IDComment277145913</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Who Is Rachel Maddow?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment275644390</link>
<description>I think when he used the word &amp;quot;newswoman&amp;quot; it threw them off. Maybe &amp;quot;political commentator/ obama footsoldier&amp;quot; would have worked on their memory, but no one watches her show either so keep that in mind.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment275644390</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : One-Percenter Justin Long, MoveOn.org Team For Romney Hit</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/01/26/one-percenter-justin-long-moveon-org-team-for-romney-hit/#IDComment275557876</link>
<description>Honestly, if political &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot; weren&amp;#039;t so one-sided I might get a chuckle out of this. A chuckle.  But it&amp;#039;s not, and I don&amp;#039;t appreciate the jokes being against the right 99.99% of the time. If you want to be a liberal and make comedy for other liberals, and preach to the choir, then great... I guess. Good for you. Don&amp;#039;t expect me to laugh or support you when I&amp;#039;m the person you&amp;#039;re insulting, EVERY SINGLE TIME.   I don&amp;#039;t know what the point of this is, the people watching it already love Obama and hate Romney. What purpose does it serve?   This guy does a funny Matthew Mcconaughey, and that&amp;#039;s about it. Call me when he does a riff on Jay Carney desperately trying to dance around Jake Tapper&amp;#039;s questions. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 03:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/01/26/one-percenter-justin-long-moveon-org-team-for-romney-hit/#IDComment275557876</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt Flashback 1988: 'If Bush Runs As Continuation Of Reaganism He Will Lose'</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-1988-if-bush-runs-as-continuation-of-reaganism-he-will-lose/#IDComment275031009</link>
<description>I think he was putting himself in the shoes of another person. I didn&amp;#039;t see him saying Reaganism would lose.   This clip is only notable for trying to hurt Gingrich. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-flashback-1988-if-bush-runs-as-continuation-of-reaganism-he-will-lose/#IDComment275031009</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt To Pelosi: 'Spit It Out'</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-to-pelosi-spit-it-out/#IDComment274528070</link>
<description>She already backed out of this. Either she had nothing and this clip was honestly misinterpreted or she was just playing games. If there was something damning out there I can&amp;#039;t believe Pelosi alone would have knowledge of it.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-to-pelosi-spit-it-out/#IDComment274528070</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>
