no one cares who you like. and no one , and i mean no one, would turn to a conservative australian for etiquette advice. you're disturbed, i know, but insignificant.

this is precisely why so many know so little. your link provided one theory. where are the other two? i'm guessing you just went looking for an article that helped make your "case" (this is why conservative radio does so well) and promptly went back to regurgitating it on every blog where the topic pops up. is this your thing? but i see your knowledge on the subject extends beyond a link? a job? absolutely laughable. what did you run, haliburton? and now you're trying to teach econ 101 in here? i guess this is the way it works, eh, old man?

your time frame of the former bush secretary comments are off, and no that's not what i was referring to. turn off fox news and try reading a bit. you'll be amazed at what's out there when you look. i'm spending this time replying because i don't think you're an idiot - just misinformed.
why don't you go back and take a look at the gdp between the years of 1920 and 1940 and write a 10 page essay on the three big theories trying to explain these numbers.(and refrain from regurgitating the same old crap over and over). this will give me a good understanding of what you know, and then we can go from there.

"skills of language appraisal" - lol. i'm guessing you're not a writer or an economist. what a clever retort! you know...to be able to pull off pedantic, you have to actually know something. i suppose in here your inane comments leave many impressed, so it would be my suggestion to you, stay in here and feel good about yourself. but if you get courageous, come see me, and i'll give you a lesson in micro and macro econ.

come on guy, who are you kidding? you try too hard. a show of hands...how many people think gary is gay? ...not that there's anything wrong with being gay

you should probably check your history on who has class and who doesn't. 43 broke "these highly respected traditions" last week. but who cares? just tell it like it is. but you old crotchety types worry about stupid crap like that or whether or not obama is wearing a jacket. damn you're silly. and are we to believe you know something about macroeconomics because you can spell it? by the look of your posts, i'm guessing that's the extent of your knowledge on the subject.

so let me get this straight...bruce here "teachers" public speaking and is an economist? damn, why aren't you "teachering" us all?

good god, you people are pathetic. gary is just spitting out the same ol' cud that he's been chewing for the last 8 years. does his poorly written rant sound any different than rush's or hannity's? gary is just hoping there are enough clowns to go around so that he might make a buck or two.

i can't believe you don't use this time to discuss your own party and problems. Jinda, the future of your party and the only politician on the planet that can make palin look like a wise choice, said it best last night: " we idiots can't be trusted by anyone...except other damn idiots- also known as our base".

any one of you morons could stand up and take control of the gop in their time of crisis. where's joe the plumber when you need him?

all joking aside...you guys are pathetic.

Well I'm sure it's no robot jox.

You know I read that as well and thought, well show me someone who has written a book and hasn't appeared on the NY Time bestseller list; now that would be impressive. I wonder if his sales will spike after mentioning it here?