<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>quivive's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.intensedebate.com/users/641160</link>
		<description>Comments by quivive</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Et tu, Main Stream Media? ABC Tapper Says Obama's Budget Represents A Broken Promise </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/et-tu-main-stream-media-abc-tapper-says-obamas-budget-represents-a-broken-promise/#IDComment292375612</link>
<description>Jake Tapper seems to be the only one in the FMSM who take his job somewhat serious. He should be the rule and not the exception. Sadly, his reporting will be drowned out by the sycophantic gaggle that overwhelmingly comprises the national media.  I see Dana Milbank criticizes his budget as well.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/obamas-budget-games/2012/02/13/gIQA3JVxBR_story.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/obamas-bud...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/et-tu-main-stream-media-abc-tapper-says-obamas-budget-represents-a-broken-promise/#IDComment292375612</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Dem Congressman: Obama Budget 'Nervous Breakdown On Paper'</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/dem-congressman-obama-budget-nervous-breakdown-on-paper/#IDComment291632222</link>
<description>Silly, we shouldn&amp;rsquo;t fall for such idiotic statements.   One way or the other the way our government conducts its business is going to change.   Either we stop spending beyond imagination or we will be forced to.    </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/dem-congressman-obama-budget-nervous-breakdown-on-paper/#IDComment291632222</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : âA New Era Of Responsibilityâ; Obama Releases Budget</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/a-new-era-of-responsibility-obama-releases-budget/#IDComment291614167</link>
<description>Actually, Romney isn&amp;rsquo;t leading the average of the national polls anymore and is behind in at least two polls in Michigan.   The primary process is the last hurdle for a candidate to prove themselves.   Romney needs this process because his record and rhetoric is lacking.   He needs the grassroots behind him if he is going to beat the Obama machine.   I plan on volunteering for this election and want to bring my kids along as an important civic lesson.     </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/a-new-era-of-responsibility-obama-releases-budget/#IDComment291614167</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Republicans Should Make 2012 a 'Mandate' Election</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/tdelbeccaro/2012/02/13/republicans-should-make-this-a-mandate-election/#IDComment291610319</link>
<description>I&amp;rsquo;m simply basing the appeasement part on the argument that Romney needed to tailor his agenda to the state of Mass.   You&amp;rsquo;ve given the argument that Romney had to put forth liberal judges and others have made the same argument that his agenda looks moderate to liberal because of the make-up of the Mass. legislature.  As far as the spending goes, we all have a problem.   However, we did balance the budget under Newt&amp;rsquo;s speakership for four years.  I know there are caveats to that, but the books were balanced.   Romney supporters often say that he will be a conservative president, but we are forced to believe that on faith.   He could win this election with tailoring his agenda to deal seriously with the ills this nation is facing.  Newt and Santorum have a conservative record and will be do what it takes to being to turn our country back to the path of prosperity.   I&amp;rsquo;m not against Romney.   I just want the country to win in 2012, and win big.   However, we need a mandate for change and a leader who will bring about that change.        </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/tdelbeccaro/2012/02/13/republicans-should-make-this-a-mandate-election/#IDComment291610319</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : âA New Era Of Responsibilityâ; Obama Releases Budget</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/a-new-era-of-responsibility-obama-releases-budget/#IDComment291582853</link>
<description>I&amp;rsquo;d love to think Romney does.   We shall see.   He has time to prove it.   He just needs to do so and soon.    </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/a-new-era-of-responsibility-obama-releases-budget/#IDComment291582853</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Republicans Should Make 2012 a 'Mandate' Election</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/tdelbeccaro/2012/02/13/republicans-should-make-this-a-mandate-election/#IDComment291581585</link>
<description>You consider success as appeasing liberals.   Most of us view success as beating back their onslaught.   One only has to look at Santorum and Newt&amp;rsquo;s record to understand why they are needed.   There are better leaders out there, but they are not in the race.   I should have added Dr. Paul.   I&amp;rsquo;m not a supporter and don&amp;rsquo;t agree with blame America or his foreign policy, but he is right on a lot of domestic issues and he won&amp;rsquo;t placate the liberals let alone be intimidated by them.   Bold colors my friend&amp;hellip; bold colors.      I wonder if misleading rhetoric will carry the day in Michigan.   So far it hasn&amp;rsquo;t.  Sorry, but you&amp;rsquo;re not going to convince anyone to not vote for Romney if he gets the nomination   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/tdelbeccaro/2012/02/13/republicans-should-make-this-a-mandate-election/#IDComment291581585</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Classic Cramer Rant: CEO's Refuse To Hire Due To ObamaCare</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/cramers-derail-rant-scared-ceos-saying-no-hiring-next-year-because-of-obamacare/#IDComment291575880</link>
<description>We have had a nice little lull from further stimulus and new progressive regulation and the economy and job market is starting to show new signs of life.   Obamacare will not only rob us of our liberties, clash with our beliefs, and harm our health, but will create permanent European job stagnation.   Welcome to the progressive dream world.    We&amp;rsquo;ve gone from a place where the individual could live the American dream to a dystopian progressive world where the liberals can implement their Marxist fantasies, while our supposed leaders cower in fear.    </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/cramers-derail-rant-scared-ceos-saying-no-hiring-next-year-because-of-obamacare/#IDComment291575880</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : âA New Era Of Responsibilityâ; Obama Releases Budget</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/a-new-era-of-responsibility-obama-releases-budget/#IDComment291567991</link>
<description>The fight is laid out for us.   Obama understands how to win the next election.   The question is does the RNC?   No matter what the grassroots do, if we don&amp;rsquo;t have the candidates to reflect the desperately needed conservative view &amp;ndash; we simply won&amp;rsquo;t win the next election.    </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/a-new-era-of-responsibility-obama-releases-budget/#IDComment291567991</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Alan Dershowitz: Media Matters Could Cost Obama the Election</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/02/13/alan-dershowitz-media-matters-could-cost-obama-the-election/#IDComment291514407</link>
<description>Whether we like or not this election will turn on economic security.   None of this will amount to an Obama loss, unless Republicans put forth a convincing blueprint to return this country to prosperity.   If they don&amp;rsquo;t, people will vote for government intervention and handouts to keep them afloat.  We are truly blessed to have those Americans who are of the Jewish faith.     </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/02/13/alan-dershowitz-media-matters-could-cost-obama-the-election/#IDComment291514407</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Republicans Should Make 2012 a 'Mandate' Election</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/tdelbeccaro/2012/02/13/republicans-should-make-this-a-mandate-election/#IDComment291502879</link>
<description>We need a president who will lead; not one that will placate the progressives.   Boehner and McConnell have demonstrated their irrational fear when it comes to standing up for conservative ideals.   They both need to be replaced.    If not, then a determined conservative president like Newt or Santorum will have to force them into doing what is right.   If we don&amp;rsquo;t begin the long laborious process of turning this country around, very soon, our beloved republic will be beyond repair.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/tdelbeccaro/2012/02/13/republicans-should-make-this-a-mandate-election/#IDComment291502879</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Director Discusses 'Occupy: Unmasked'; Film Exposes Left-Wing Organization Behind Movement</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/director-discusses-occupy-unmasked-film-exposes-left-wing-organization-behind-movement/#IDComment291494541</link>
<description>It seems to me that progressives are losing their mojo.   It took them well over a year to concoct &amp;ldquo;Occupy&amp;rdquo; and when they did it backfired on them.    </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/director-discusses-occupy-unmasked-film-exposes-left-wing-organization-behind-movement/#IDComment291494541</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : 'Obama We Are Through With You' Palin Roasts President at CPAC</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-we-are-through-with-you-palin-roasts-president-at-cpac/#IDComment290848974</link>
<description>Thanks for replying.   I completely agree with you.   I said she is the best commentator on the idiot box (TV).   But she is underachieving if she doesn&amp;rsquo;t become president.   I was attempting to be clever on my endorsement of her.  Apparently, I missed the mark.    I have and will continue to write glowingly of her.    </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-we-are-through-with-you-palin-roasts-president-at-cpac/#IDComment290848974</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Flashback 1983: Ron Paul Stars In Congressional Baseball Game</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/flashback-1983-ron-paul-stars-in-congressional-baseball-game/#IDComment290752594</link>
<description>His age just shows he is a survivor.    </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/flashback-1983-ron-paul-stars-in-congressional-baseball-game/#IDComment290752594</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Flashback 1983: Ron Paul Stars In Congressional Baseball Game</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/flashback-1983-ron-paul-stars-in-congressional-baseball-game/#IDComment290715341</link>
<description>Same here.    </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/flashback-1983-ron-paul-stars-in-congressional-baseball-game/#IDComment290715341</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Flashback 1983: Ron Paul Stars In Congressional Baseball Game</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/flashback-1983-ron-paul-stars-in-congressional-baseball-game/#IDComment290645667</link>
<description>Dr. Paul has it in him.  I&amp;rsquo;m not a supporter, but he is tenacious enough to be president.    </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/flashback-1983-ron-paul-stars-in-congressional-baseball-game/#IDComment290645667</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : White House Misleads On Budget Law</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/white-house-misleads-on-budget-law/#IDComment290638640</link>
<description>Laws are for losers.   Obama&amp;rsquo;s whims are what counts.  We live in a country where we have laws about everything including light bulbs - yet the more we have the less our president and his gaggle have to follow.      </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/white-house-misleads-on-budget-law/#IDComment290638640</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : 'Obama We Are Through With You' Palin Roasts President at CPAC</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-we-are-through-with-you-palin-roasts-president-at-cpac/#IDComment290581100</link>
<description>Palin will always be underachieving by being the best commentator on the idiot box.  Are the thumbs down because I think she is a great commentator or because I think she has date with destiny?       </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-we-are-through-with-you-palin-roasts-president-at-cpac/#IDComment290581100</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Sarah Palin's Entire Rousing CPAC Speech</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/sarah-palins-entire-rousing-cpac-speech/#IDComment290578102</link>
<description>What could have been or is it what will be? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/sarah-palins-entire-rousing-cpac-speech/#IDComment290578102</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Harry Reid: First Amendment Concerns Are 'Senseless'</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/harry-reid-first-amendment-concerns-are-senseless/#IDComment289969508</link>
<description>If creepy Harry Reid&amp;rsquo;s supposed religious beliefs mean nothing to him - then why would our natural born rights.     </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/harry-reid-first-amendment-concerns-are-senseless/#IDComment289969508</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : CNN To Gingrich Campaign: 'How Much Money Do You Have?'</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/cnn-to-gingrich-campaign-how-much-money-do-you-have/#IDComment288043393</link>
<description>He should have retorted, how low are your ratings.    </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 16:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/cnn-to-gingrich-campaign-how-much-money-do-you-have/#IDComment288043393</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>
