poofster

poofster

44p

6 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0

150 weeks ago @ Big Hollywood - Lonewolf Diaries: Why ... · 1 reply · +5 points

Stupidity is someone calling religion stupidity that has "GuyWhoDoesYourMom" for a screen name.

150 weeks ago @ Big Hollywood - Lonewolf Diaries: Why ... · 0 replies · +4 points

It's amusing the only "freedom" the left seems to want is the ability to freely rip a living being from your uterus. Or the ability to have porn with no restrictions, as one of the lawyers on Obama's team fought for, at the expense of our children. You put the ability to abort on demand above a person's right to religion. Thank you oh so much for your fight for freedom.
And if you want to go down THIS avenue: "Why do religious people get to make those decisions for everyone else?" Then why do the people that lack religion get to make decisions for everyone else? Why do you get to tell me I can't pray in school or public places? Why do you get to tell me when and where I can pray? Why do you get to tell me how a Catholic church should do it's finances and take away any say from them in it? Why do you get to take control of property that that Church BOUGHT? Because that's what happened in North Carolina. WHY do you get to take my hard earned money and use it to pay for abortions and condoms and birth control? Why do you get to tell me that my child is better off in public school and not at home learning because you happen think it's wrong their mother is teaching creationism and not your bs evolution? Because that's what's happening in North Carolina. Why do you take away my right to decide what lifestyles my child should and shouldn't be taught? Regardless if I agree or not, it's STILL MY child. Why do YOU think you know what's best for my child??

SO. Tell me. What makes you think you can tell me that the decisions you make are better than mine?

150 weeks ago @ Big Hollywood - Lonewolf Diaries: Why ... · 0 replies · 0 points

Fantastic!

155 weeks ago @ Big Hollywood - Flashpoint! A Woman's ... · 0 replies · +1 points

Thank you

155 weeks ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Cute kid ... · 23 replies · +7 points

I offer a section of Ronald Reagan's speech, a hero of mine, in order to address appeasement, accommodation, retreating, and backing down:

Those who would trade our freedom for the soup kitchen of the welfare state have told us that they have a utopian solution of peace without victory. They call their policy "accommodation." And they say if we only avoid any direct confrontation with the enemy, he will forget his evil ways and learn to love us. All who oppose them are indicted as warmongers. They say we offer simple answers to complex problems. Well, perhaps there is a simple answer--not an easy answer--but simple.

Admittedly there is a risk in any course we follow other than this, but every lesson in history tells us that the greater risk lies in appeasement, and this is the specter our well-meaning liberal friends refuse to face--that their policy of accommodation is appeasement, and it gives no choice between peace and war, only between fight and surrender. If we continue to accommodate, continue to back and retreat, eventually we have to face the final demand--the ultimatum. And what then? When Nikita Khrushchev has told his people he knows what our answer will be? He has told them that we are retreating under the pressure of the Cold War, and someday when the time comes to deliver the ultimatum, our surrender will be voluntary because by that time we will have weakened from within spiritually, morally, and economically. He believes this because from our side he has heard voices pleading for "peace at any price" or "better Red than dead," or as one commentator put it, he would rather "live on his knees than die on his feet." And therein lies the road to war, because those voices don't speak for the rest of us. You and I know and do not believe that life is so dear and peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery. If nothing in life is worth dying for, when did this begin--just in the face of this enemy? Or should Moses have told the children of Israel to live in slavery under the pharaohs? Should Christ have refused the cross? Should the patriots at Concord Bridge have thrown down their guns and refused to fire the shot heard 'round the world? The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn't die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well, it's a simple answer after all.

You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, "There is a price we will not pay." There is a point beyond which they must not advance. This is the meaning in the phrase of Barry Goldwater's "peace through strength." Winston Churchill said that "the destiny of man is not measured by material computation. When great forces are on the move in the world, we learn we are spirits--not animals." And he said, "There is something going on in time and space, and beyond time and space, which, whether we like it or not, spells duty."

155 weeks ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Cute kid ... · 0 replies · +1 points

we won't even allow a moment of silence to allow those who want to pray if they choose to do so. but we have ACLU and CAIR fighting to prevent that while fighting to allow only Muslims days off or separate facilities to pray on their own. And it is clear ACLU and CAIR's goals when it comes to Western Civilization. And like France and the UK we see ourselves day by day submitting to these groups demands while oppressing Christians to "avoid intolerance, tension, and offending anyone".