NOM has a reply to HRC's "attack." It does not refute any of the points HRC makes. It more like a "I know you are, but what am I" kind of comeback.

HRC's web page does a very good job of debunking each of the examples cited in the video. The doctor's problem has nothing to do with marriage. The church that was renting out it's pavilion to the public for secular activities also took public funds to help maintain the structure and just does not want to rent to gays. Only the mom that does not like her kid learning about gays in school applied to the marriage debate and then only remotely. She should home school her kid if she wants to keep him ignorant to the realities of life.

There are laws against marrying your sister because some breeders are not smart enough to realize that there needs to be some diversity to the gene pool. I'm so over the whole man & dog argument. Does anyone seriously think that someone wants to marry their dog. Come on. I'm also over the Christianists and their use of the bible to justify their bigotry. • Here's a nugget from the Bible: DEUTERONOMY22:13-21 If it is discovered that a bride is not a virgin, the Bible demands that she be executed by stoning immediately. How's that for traditional family values. I'm collecting my stones right now.

Could this be momentum?