Give your donations directly to Memorial Sloan-Kettering (or another cancer research facility). MSK does excellent work in research and you can bypass the middle man. Even if they weren't funding organizations that have nothing to do with their stated mission of breast wellness, you'd still be losing a big chunk of your donation to overhead by giving through Komen. Give straight to those doing the work. You can designate it specifically for breast cancer if you like and there ya go. You've done it without the help of a large leftist organization that will actually only get your donation dispersed to the cause at a fraction of each dollar.

What's ironic is that studies have found a higher risk of breast cancer in those women who have had abortions. So SGK giving money to PP is kind of like a dentist giving out lollipops.

In what way?

The information is factual. Whether you like the presentation of it or not, there's no dispute as to whether or not it's the truth.

He said corpse-man THREE times in that speech. By the third time you know it's not a mistake. He thinks that's what it says.

Obama does something stupid daily and the msm just ignores it.

I completely agree with this! And I've said before that conservatives are missing the boat on trying to make films and art and then trying to distribute it through Democrat/leftist channels. Trying to play their game. It won't work. You're just contributing to their power.

Publishing is a great place for conservative resurgence. With digital publishing and fewer gatekeepers the work can see distribution in a relatively short amount of time. With film making it's going to take years to establish an entirely new track of production/distribution outside the union-controlled industry. But it's doable.

Good luck with the effort. Eff the Democrats and their tyrannical art stifling.

Nor does it hold a candle to "corpse man" and the two brilliant photographic pieces: Umbrella Conundrum and Mom Jeans Biker. And then of course there's the time he said he bowled like he was in the Special Olympics. Smoooooooth.

There's an outrageous amount of material on this guy.

Oh! Remember "we don't want to spike the football" after the Bin Laden hit and then he proceeded to spike the freakin' football every chance he got. Ha! What an idiot.

Exactly! How many of those 98% have insurance paid for by the tax payers? That's "free riding the system" for cryin' out loud! It was cheaper the other way.

There you go acting like a Democrat, putting words in other people's mouths. I never said I wouldn't vote for Romney. I don't want to vote for Newt either. But Romney is going to lose big time mainly because of his dishonest campaign tactics in the primary.

Remember how the Swiftboat veterans were said to have been "debunked" because of one ever-so-slight possible inaccuracy in their book? Over and over that was the theme. Now imagine they had actually, blatantly lied about something (as Romney has in this instance -- even though it's against Gingrich and not Obama it can be used against him as evidence of character issues). They will toast him like a marshmallow. He'll be our nominee thanks to his tactics, but he will not win the presidency. He'll lose all the independents we supposedly need when he's painted as a dishonest thug.

Yep, Newt was never my first choice. Romney has Romneycare, gun control, pro-abortion bills, AGW belief (John Holdren, look him up) tax hikes, etc. under his belt too. His record sucks worse than Gingrich's and ain't that sad?

None of the things you listed excuses this dishonest attack. Mitt Romney is proving himself to be a liar. How do you know you can trust anything on his platform? What is his platform anyway?

Regardless, this kind of thing -- the execution and subsequent championing of it -- is a sign that a powerful part of the Republican party is indeed no better than the Democrats. We will lose in 2012 because of this very thing. Count on it.

Exactly what I'm saying. The only thing Romney has is this dishonest, thuggish campaigning. This is how he's defeating the other candidates, not with a solid platform. They will neutralize this immediately -- likely using his primary behavior as proof -- and he won't stand a chance at landing a punch on the weakest candidate we've ever faced. Because everything he says from now on is tainted with this blatant dishonesty and they will use that against him until he's simply toast.

The problem is that Romney and his supporters seem to believe the media will continue as they have been in during the primary. Not a chance in hell. They are going to pull a 180 and use all of this against Romney. Forget what the polls say now, they don't represent the reality of the election.