Likely this area has an administrative problem. However, having been a student once, having paid attention in class, I wonder if it's politically incorrect to suggest that maybe the students are also at fault? Now I hate to get in the way of your politicking, but it may very well be that these are little bastards are a real handful. After all, there's bound to be some variance.

In any case, I've seen better and worse educational institutions. But I have see the same of classrooms. Breitbart.com amongst them.

They are allowed. I don't think Ron Paul is correct in his strategic assessment of America's position. However, his candidacy is worth it's weight in gold due to offering an alternative to the very costly busybody model of governance which, evidence has shown, Republicans are only slightly less effective at imposing and which they embrace with no less zeal.

Man you Americans are definitely winning the Zinger war. Ha ha, I have been really worried about the Islamist-related geopolitical problems. I'm really enjoying a good laugh at the numerous good ones in this thread. Just a shame the mad mullahs don't share your sense of humor. Thanks guys!

-Love From Canada.

It's not a healthy thing to start believing in propaganda that makes you sneer at your fellow man.

"Go sell crazy somewhere else...we're all stocked up here." Yea, the people here are showing it in abundance.

As far as behavior goes, the Republican tools who oppose him appear every bit as intoxicated and rabid as the Ron Paul supporters.

Well, from what I understand, Israel did at least tolerate Hamas, so long as they engaged in the deception that their main opponent was Fatah, and not Israel.

However, Ron is engaging in rather more than misleading exaggeration when he says this, because his own policies would entail that the USA would similarly tolerate virtually all terrorist organizations that are not directly acting on their own soil at a given time.

However, I am amused by the viciousness and desperation of the opposition to Ron Paul. I really wish another 8 years of Robamney on the republic you serve by dint of calumny. I despise the liars that many of you have made yourselves out to be, in an effort to stop a Man who you can effectively oppose without lying, or acting like buffoons as we see throughout this website.

I thought I was inured to politics, but I keep being shocked at the degree of tacit collusion evident in the behavior of the media with respect to candidates like ron paul.

Canadian national newspapers are running these same points as is fox news, and the National Review. The republican establishment doesn't appear to be coping well with Ron Paul, and they are taking out the long knives.

I'm increasingly being driven away from politics, because the whole system appears to have little vested in honesty, moral integrity, mental clarity or long term efficacy. Where can wisdom be found?

Well, isn't it fair to suggest that Bachmann is against Islamicist ideology? I don't think that's such a heinous thing myself. I also don't think it's totally untrue.

As far as this 20 year old newsletter, I haven't seen the material, but given the perfunctory judgement of racism that gets thrown around, I would tend to give Ron Paul the benefit of the doubt. He has explicitly repudiated judging people based upon race. As it happens, I believe him.

When it comes to someone like you whose behavior illustrates the tendency to prejudicial remarks. You who appear eager to throw sweeping accusations against people you don't know, leaping to conclusions about their Character and so on. I don't believe in the sincerity of your denunciations of bigots. You have a political ax to grind, for whatever reason, and are not interested in the truth.

I am still interested in the truth. That's why I increasingly dislike the approach to politics that uses smear campaigns against those whom argument is insufficient to crush.

Your capacity for logic needs a lot of work.