<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>masmanz's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.intensedebate.com/users/626922</link>
		<description>Comments by masmanz</description>
<item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : US-Funded Textbooks Teach Afghan Children Whitewashed History</title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/02/06/us-funded-textbooks-teach-afghan-children-whitewashed-history/#IDComment286450898</link>
<description>If you close your eyes you cannot see the Sun. Then you would ask if it ever existed. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Feb 2012 19:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/02/06/us-funded-textbooks-teach-afghan-children-whitewashed-history/#IDComment286450898</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : Offshore Everywhere</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/engelhardt/2012/02/05/offshore-everywhere/#IDComment285761269</link>
<description>I agree with liveload, If Pakistan has even a mediocre  Air force they can easily shoot down all the drones and the various helicopters, but then they will have to face the B2s and nukes -- no defense against those. As long as those in power do not get too arrogant and start engaging Russia or China we will all be safe here. All the hype about AlQaida reach is way overblown.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Feb 2012 00:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/engelhardt/2012/02/05/offshore-everywhere/#IDComment285761269</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Pakistan's Supreme Court Moves Forward With PM's Contempt Case</title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/02/02/pakistans-supreme-court-moves-forward-with-pms-contempt-case/#IDComment283198593</link>
<description>US Supreme Court should learn something from Pakistan&amp;#039;s. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 23:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/02/02/pakistans-supreme-court-moves-forward-with-pms-contempt-case/#IDComment283198593</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Justice Dept, FBI Say Interest in Online Privacy an 'Indicator' of Terrorism </title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/02/02/justice-dept-fbi-say-interest-in-online-privacy-an-indicator-of-terrorism/#IDComment283196822</link>
<description>Gestapo didn&amp;#039;t have this kind of technology. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 23:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/02/02/justice-dept-fbi-say-interest-in-online-privacy-an-indicator-of-terrorism/#IDComment283196822</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Justice Dept, FBI Say Interest in Online Privacy an 'Indicator' of Terrorism </title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/02/02/justice-dept-fbi-say-interest-in-online-privacy-an-indicator-of-terrorism/#IDComment282939683</link>
<description>The next question would be your ethnicity, if you are brown you better not do any of those things. Why would a brown person go to Starbucks if there is evidence that he can make coffee at home? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 16:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/02/02/justice-dept-fbi-say-interest-in-online-privacy-an-indicator-of-terrorism/#IDComment282939683</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Pakistan Denies Leaked Report's Claim of Alliance with Taliban</title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/02/01/pakistan-denies-leaked-reports-claim-of-alliance-with-taliban/#IDComment282447621</link>
<description>The last paragraph makes no sense, the reason is that the term &amp;#039;Taliban&amp;#039; is indiscriminately applied to anyone and everyone. There are Afghan Taliban who are fighting the US and NATO forces, then there are so-called Pakistani Taliban who are fighting the Pakistani military. Then there are ordinary civilians who are killed by US drones or Pakistani shelling and they are posthumously indicted as Taliban. Hope this will clear up the confusion. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 03:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/02/01/pakistan-denies-leaked-reports-claim-of-alliance-with-taliban/#IDComment282447621</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : British Terror Plot: Four 'Islamists' Planned to Try to Blow Up a Toilet</title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/02/01/british-terror-plot-four-islamists-planned-to-try-to-blow-up-a-toilet/#IDComment282010233</link>
<description>As long as they can put Al-Qaeda, Islam, and blowing-up together in a news item the rest of the story doesn&amp;#039;t really matter, The main purpose is to keep us scared and continue to eat up our tax dollars. If this causes a major problem for a tiny minority, that is a price worth it (or, for some,  it is icing on cake). </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Feb 2012 18:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/02/01/british-terror-plot-four-islamists-planned-to-try-to-blow-up-a-toilet/#IDComment282010233</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Sen. Feinstein: I Thought Pakistan Drone Strikes Were 'Secret' </title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/01/31/sen-feinstein-i-thought-pakistan-drone-strikes-were-secret/#IDComment281165340</link>
<description>When a president discloses it it is not a secret.... What was the point of the &amp;#039;secret&amp;#039; anyway when everyone knows that only the US has those drones? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Feb 2012 21:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/01/31/sen-feinstein-i-thought-pakistan-drone-strikes-were-secret/#IDComment281165340</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Taliban Leadership: No Talks With Karzai Govt.</title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/01/31/taliban-leadership-no-talks-with-karzai-govt/#IDComment281162593</link>
<description>...The mistake from the beginning.... We can talk about mistakes only if we know the purpose. The original official purpose was achieved by the end of 2001, why are we still there? An occupying force cannot afford to have a strong and honest local leader as a puppet. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Feb 2012 21:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/01/31/taliban-leadership-no-talks-with-karzai-govt/#IDComment281162593</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Israeli Government Moves to Subsidize Settlers, Legalize Outposts</title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/01/31/israeli-government-moves-to-subsidize-settlers-legalize-outposts/#IDComment281053200</link>
<description>Why Zuhir Mohsen? ask Newt Gingrich, or any other person who salivates at the idea of getting funding and support from the Zionists.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Feb 2012 18:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/01/31/israeli-government-moves-to-subsidize-settlers-legalize-outposts/#IDComment281053200</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Obama Denies 'Huge Number of Civilian Casualties' in Drone War</title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/01/30/obama-denies-huge-number-of-civilian-casualties-in-drone-war/#IDComment280194069</link>
<description>What he means to say is that it is just a few hundred innocent people -- not huge number. Those killed were not even White. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/01/30/obama-denies-huge-number-of-civilian-casualties-in-drone-war/#IDComment280194069</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : US Meets With Taliban as Karzai Govt. Looks to Start Own Talks</title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/01/29/us-meets-with-taliban-as-karzai-govt-looks-to-start-own-talks/#IDComment278979838</link>
<description>What is the point of all these talks? Just leave the place and bring the troops home.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/01/29/us-meets-with-taliban-as-karzai-govt-looks-to-start-own-talks/#IDComment278979838</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : No Muss, No Fuss, No More Habeas Corpus</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/dtrotter/2012/01/25/no-muss-no-fuss-no-more-habeas-corpus/#IDComment275229168</link>
<description>The congress would not have voted for the bill if &amp;quot;we the American people&amp;quot; had not supported it. &amp;quot;We the People&amp;quot; wrongly or rightly believe that the bill will only be used against those pesky Moslems. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/dtrotter/2012/01/25/no-muss-no-fuss-no-more-habeas-corpus/#IDComment275229168</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Human Rights Watch Warns of Iraq's 'Budding Police State' </title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/01/22/human-rights-watch-warns-of-iraqs-budding-police-state/#IDComment272284438</link>
<description>&amp;quot;...move toward authoritarianism&amp;quot; Move toward?? these HRW guys and gals must have been sleeping throughout  the whole occupation period. They probably missed the whole shock and awe show -- Or should we call it &amp;quot;engulf and devour. &amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/01/22/human-rights-watch-warns-of-iraqs-budding-police-state/#IDComment272284438</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Islamist Factions the Big Winners in Arab Spring</title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/01/19/islamist-factions-the-big-winners-in-arab-spring/#IDComment269758133</link>
<description>This is not true, only those are crushed who oppose Western hegemony. Although there have been many secular leaders there really has been no mass secular movements (only nationalist ones) in the Muslim world. In Turkey the secularists gained power after a coup. In Iraq and Syria Baathists took control after military coups. In Pakistan, a secular military dictator Ayub Khan took control after a coup. These were not mass movements. And the secular dictators were supported by the US as long as they were &amp;#039;friendly&amp;#039; to us. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/01/19/islamist-factions-the-big-winners-in-arab-spring/#IDComment269758133</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Iran Warns Arab Rivals Not to Interfere With Hormuz, Sanctions Issues</title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/01/19/iran-warns-arab-rivals-not-to-interfere-with-hormuz-sanctions-issues/#IDComment269703800</link>
<description>It may just be ironical (or by design, who knows?)  but our government&amp;#039;s recent adventures in Iraq and Afghanistan have only helped Iran and not the so-called Sunni regimes in the region. Before the US invasion, Afghanistan&amp;#039;s Northern Alliance was actively supported by Iran in their war against the Taliban. Now NA is ruling that country. And, the close ties of the current leaders of Iraq with the Irani regime is quite a contrast with Saddam&amp;#039;s policies. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/01/19/iran-warns-arab-rivals-not-to-interfere-with-hormuz-sanctions-issues/#IDComment269703800</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Libya's 'Freedom Fighters' Are Imposing Harsh Brand of Militant Islam</title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/01/18/libyas-freedom-fighters-are-imposing-harsh-brand-of-militant-islam/#IDComment269260275</link>
<description>Not sure how you define dictatorship and democracy. If a democracy bans alcohol it becomes dictatorship? If it bans pot it continues to be a democracy? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 04:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2012/01/18/libyas-freedom-fighters-are-imposing-harsh-brand-of-militant-islam/#IDComment269260275</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Pakistan: Fully Functional Air Defense Installed Along Afghan Border</title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2011/12/09/pakistan-fully-functional-air-defense-installed-along-afghan-border/#IDComment236069733</link>
<description>There is zero chance of Haqqani or the non-existent AlQaida taking control of the air defense system. However, at some point in time the Pakistani Air Force might think it appropriate to start shooting down the drones. If the US decides to go for an all out war in response to the shootings then that would be catastrophic.  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 21:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2011/12/09/pakistan-fully-functional-air-defense-installed-along-afghan-border/#IDComment236069733</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : Did FDR Provoke Pearl Harbor?</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/buchanan/2011/12/06/did-fdr-provoke-pearl-harbor/#IDComment234273707</link>
<description>We need to make a Tora Bora movie now, detailing how we got into Afghanistan and what are we doing there. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Dec 2011 18:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/buchanan/2011/12/06/did-fdr-provoke-pearl-harbor/#IDComment234273707</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : Did FDR Provoke Pearl Harbor?</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/buchanan/2011/12/06/did-fdr-provoke-pearl-harbor/#IDComment234272878</link>
<description>We need to make a Tora Bora movie now, detailing how we got into Afghanistan and what are we doing there. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Dec 2011 18:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/buchanan/2011/12/06/did-fdr-provoke-pearl-harbor/#IDComment234272878</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>
