Stop writing articles on the guy. People like him need to be ignored.

Groovy!

Leo - you really ought to do these essays in video. Your research and analysis are too good to be limited to blog entries here at BH. If Breitbart does indeed get his tv channel then this work is probably the ideal material for documentaries there.

Leo - please turn this and other articles in the same series into documentaries. No doubt, IFC, Bravo and The Sundance Channel won't be interested, but there must be a market for quality film history docs somewhere.

Imagine a Fox daytime show: "Sarah". Similar format to Oprah, with live studio audience and all. I don't know why this hasn't already happened. The show would get such a big audience. Through this Sarah could help to change the culture, and perhaps even swing the notoriously Dem-voting women's block away from the entitlement/grievance/identity politics culture that they so favor now.

I love this woman. However, I think she may well be even more powerful if she stays out of office and instead leads the culture, via tv and other media. Take Rush or O'Reilly for example - giant influences on the culture who could never get elected but who wield far more power than most politicians. Perhaps she might be electable if this venal socialist in the White House now ends up as the most unpopular President of all time - which I think is a distinct possibility. If the culture has shifted far enough away from socialism - both hard core Dem and soft core Rep by the time this joker's term is up - then she might have a chance.

your videos would be a lot more watchable if you bothered to balance your sound levels. I spent the entire video moving the volume slider up or down due to the bad sound mixing job you did. You're not doing PJTV's reputation any good if you can't master this filmmaking 101 procedure.

Sorry to be off topic, but I wanted to bring to people's attention that CSPAN2's BookTV is reprehensibly devoting 3 hours tomorrow, Sunday, June 7, at 12:00 PM est to BILL AYERS. The show is live and usually in these In Depth shows they have viewers call in to ask questions. This is a disgusting act by CSPAN and Ayers needs to hear from as many of us as possible who can call in, while the channel also needs a good slap to the face.
http://www.booktv.org/program.aspx?ProgramId=1055...

Thought of a new catchphrase for B.O./Spock:
"Talk Long - And With a Teleprompter"

The actual phrase doesn't - and never - made any linguistic sense if you think about it. I remember dating a girl in the early 90's who was indoctrinated in this mindset, and the feeling she conveyed that this phrase meant something "polite" or "civil" or "respectful", or something along those lines. Involving the word "politically" into a two-word phrase should, by any logical standards surely raise the skepticism of any thinker - left or right. "Politically Expedient" or "Politically Embarrassing" are the first two examples I can think of that demonstrate the redundantly political nature of the phrase. It's subjective - politically - and it has been and always was employed by the left as "thought-control" from the outset. It means nothing and should be discredited. The phrase and the tv show title "Politically Incorrect" should also be discredited as worthless linguistic gimmicks.