<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>markalves's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.intensedebate.com/users/625217</link>
		<description>Comments by markalves</description>
<item>
<title>Christian Web Trends Blog by OurChurch.Com : Putting the Truth-O-Meter to 10 SEO Myths</title>
<link>http://blog.ourchurch.com/2010/04/20/putting-the-truth-o-meter-to-10-seo-myths/#IDComment69859094</link>
<description>D&amp;#039;oh! Disadvantage me. I scrolled up to get the author&amp;#039;s name and somehow came back down with John&amp;#039;s. For the record, I should&amp;#039;ve said Paul. Sorry about that! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 02:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.ourchurch.com/2010/04/20/putting-the-truth-o-meter-to-10-seo-myths/#IDComment69859094</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Christian Web Trends Blog by OurChurch.Com : Putting the Truth-O-Meter to 10 SEO Myths</title>
<link>http://blog.ourchurch.com/2010/04/20/putting-the-truth-o-meter-to-10-seo-myths/#IDComment69540550</link>
<description>Advantage, John.  For #8 about old pages, you can also look at analytics to see how and why people are ending up on that page. In the case of a popular but expired event that isn&amp;#039;t going to be repeated, there may be value in keeping it there to offer a bit of historical perspective. (Was the senior citizen hot dog eating contest in 2007 or 2008? And where was it held?) If traffic is getting there, there&amp;#039;s either some interest or it&amp;#039;s linked elsewhere on your site in a way that&amp;#039;s drawing attention.   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 02:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.ourchurch.com/2010/04/20/putting-the-truth-o-meter-to-10-seo-myths/#IDComment69540550</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Ron Edmondson : Teaching Children Honesty</title>
<link>http://www.ronedmondson.com/2010/03/teaching-children-honesty.html#IDComment64352630</link>
<description>Great list of suggestions. Modeling honest behavior is especially important and effective.  Another Biblical example to promote a discussion about honesty, particularly around this time of year, is Peter&amp;#039;s denial.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.ronedmondson.com/2010/03/teaching-children-honesty.html#IDComment64352630</guid>
</item><item>
<title>ChurchCrunch : Get Your Church Online: What is Your Address? </title>
<link>http://churchcrunch.com/get-your-church-online-what-is-your-address/#IDComment43691024</link>
<description>There are some other cool domain lookup tools listed here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://webdesignledger.com/tools/10-useful-tools-for-finding-the-perfect-domain-name&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://webdesignledger.com/tools/10-useful-tools-...&lt;/a&gt;  I recently got excited to see a domain was available according to these types of domain checkers only to learn when I went to buy that it had been registered long ago. These services get it right most of the time, but it&amp;#039;s a good idea to check your short list against a definitive whois lookup service, such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://whois.domaintools.com/[insert&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://whois.domaintools.com/[insert&lt;/a&gt; domain name] </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://churchcrunch.com/get-your-church-online-what-is-your-address/#IDComment43691024</guid>
</item><item>
<title>ChurchCrunch : Protecting Your Email Communication from Social Media</title>
<link>http://churchcrunch.com/protecting-your-email-communication-from-social-media/#IDComment42768041</link>
<description>Interesting approach. I wonder, though, if some users of such a disclaimer would end up with a false sense of security. It&amp;#039;s hard to declare all of your messages off the record by default when you&amp;#039;re sharing them via an electronic record. Handling this on an as-needed basis would seem to be clearer than relying on fine print.  Also, what about situations where an email is being read through an employer&amp;#039;s network? In those cases, the recipient has probably signed an agreement acknowledging the employer has rights to any such traffic. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://churchcrunch.com/protecting-your-email-communication-from-social-media/#IDComment42768041</guid>
</item><item>
<title>ChurchCrunch : Scot McKnight and the Theology of Twitter</title>
<link>http://churchcrunch.com/scot-mcknight-and-the-theology-of-twitter/#IDComment42766936</link>
<description>Rex&amp;#039;s prayer for the busy geek comes to mind: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rexblog.com/2009/11/07/20124&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.rexblog.com/2009/11/07/20124&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://churchcrunch.com/scot-mcknight-and-the-theology-of-twitter/#IDComment42766936</guid>
</item><item>
<title>ChurchCrunch : 5 Thoughts about Improving Comments</title>
<link>http://churchcrunch.com/5-thoughts-about-improving-comments/#IDComment41902056</link>
<description>For blogs that generate tons of comments, the Slashdot rating system is handy because you can filter to see only those comments that receive a certain minimum score.  Having a preview option before publishing a comment is helpful since some systems treat formatting in unexpected ways. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Nov 2009 04:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://churchcrunch.com/5-thoughts-about-improving-comments/#IDComment41902056</guid>
</item><item>
<title>ChurchCrunch : Blogging and 10,000 Hours</title>
<link>http://churchcrunch.com/2009/10/26/blogging-and-10000-hours/#IDComment40928477</link>
<description>With all that you crank out, what multiple of 10,000 are you up to by now?  If you take 10-11 hour days at 6 days a week (allowing for one day of rest) you&amp;#039;ll get to 10,000 hours in 3 years. The public ministry of Jesus was three years. He didn&amp;#039;t need to practice, but maybe the rest of us who do can take it as inspiration. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 05:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://churchcrunch.com/2009/10/26/blogging-and-10000-hours/#IDComment40928477</guid>
</item><item>
<title>ChurchCrunch : Finding the Right Volunteers for Online Ministry</title>
<link>http://churchcrunch.com/finding-the-right-volunteers-for-online-ministry/#IDComment40365354</link>
<description>From my experience managing volunteers, I&amp;#039;d rather have someone who is passionately interested in helping my ministry even if they don&amp;#039;t (yet) have the skills than to have someone who is already a pro in that area but not necessarily committed. (If you can have both then obviously that&amp;#039;s ideal.) Our best online ministry volunteers learned the technical skills after the fact so they could make a difference. Many who already had technical skills expressed an interest, but didn&amp;#039;t always commit when they have other competing projects in the same field.  Having an honest, detailed job description for the volunteer position with a specific time period (such as a year) also helps find the right volunteers. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://churchcrunch.com/finding-the-right-volunteers-for-online-ministry/#IDComment40365354</guid>
</item><item>
<title>ChurchCrunch : Do You Honestly Love Writing?</title>
<link>http://churchcrunch.com/do-you-honestly-love-writing/#IDComment40363794</link>
<description>&amp;quot;I hate writing. I love having written.&amp;quot; -- Dorothy Parker </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://churchcrunch.com/do-you-honestly-love-writing/#IDComment40363794</guid>
</item><item>
<title>ChurchCrunch : An Online Ministry with No Metrics Can Be...</title>
<link>http://churchcrunch.com/2009/10/10/an-online-ministry-with-no-metrics-can-be/#IDComment38321296</link>
<description>If your online ministry is supporting a meatspace church then the starting point should be your church&amp;#039;s objectives. Determining the ways your online ministry will support those overall objectives gives you your online ministry goals. Once you have those goals then you can figure out which metrics to use.  By following this sequence, your metrics not only help you assess your own ministry, but they also make it much easier to get support from your pastor and to motivate your volunteers. You can clearly show how you&amp;#039;re contributing to objectives that the entire community can relate to rather than focusing exclusively on technical stats without that grander context. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 03:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://churchcrunch.com/2009/10/10/an-online-ministry-with-no-metrics-can-be/#IDComment38321296</guid>
</item><item>
<title>ChurchCrunch : Giveaway: 500 Business Cards!</title>
<link>http://churchcrunch.com/giveaway-500-business-cards/#IDComment37761719</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;d use them for networking. And when someone asked me where I got these cool cards, I&amp;#039;d give a shout-out to Uprinting and ChurchCrunch of course. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Oct 2009 02:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://churchcrunch.com/giveaway-500-business-cards/#IDComment37761719</guid>
</item><item>
<title>ChurchCrunch : How Many Domains and Websites Does Your Church Have?</title>
<link>http://churchcrunch.com/2009/09/29/how-many-domains-and-websites-does-your-church-have/#IDComment36555622</link>
<description>We&amp;#039;ve got two -- one for the church and one for the school (along with a subdomain for a special charity). </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 01:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://churchcrunch.com/2009/09/29/how-many-domains-and-websites-does-your-church-have/#IDComment36555622</guid>
</item><item>
<title>ChurchCrunch : The Digital Divide Between Ministries</title>
<link>http://churchcrunch.com/2009/09/22/the-digital-divide-between-ministries/#IDComment35561159</link>
<description>If you think of the comparison as looking down on another ministry&amp;#039;s technological speck compared to our own technological plank, it becomes clear where we need to focus. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://churchcrunch.com/2009/09/22/the-digital-divide-between-ministries/#IDComment35561159</guid>
</item><item>
<title>ChurchCrunch : One of the Most Important Ingredients in Ministry Web Development Is...</title>
<link>http://churchcrunch.com/2009/09/19/one-of-the-most-important-ingredients-in-ministry-web-development-is/#IDComment35139565</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m with Graham -- where can we get some more of this &amp;quot;time&amp;quot; thing you mentioned? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 02:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://churchcrunch.com/2009/09/19/one-of-the-most-important-ingredients-in-ministry-web-development-is/#IDComment35139565</guid>
</item><item>
<title>ChurchCrunch : John Piper, Desiring God Blog Opens Comments</title>
<link>http://churchcrunch.com/2009/08/22/john-piper-desiring-god-blog-opens-comments/#IDComment31730203</link>
<description>Speaking of comments, today&amp;#039;s Washington Post&amp;#039;s ombudsman column covers the challenges of moderating comments. In this example, an estranged spouse offered details in an article&amp;#039;s comments section that directly contradicted what was said in the article. A flood of comments came in as a response, making it a philosophical question of whether to remove nested comments. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/21/AR2009082103227.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/arti...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://churchcrunch.com/2009/08/22/john-piper-desiring-god-blog-opens-comments/#IDComment31730203</guid>
</item><item>
<title>ChurchCrunch : Barna and Correcting Big Digital Mistakes</title>
<link>http://churchcrunch.com/2009/08/10/barna-and-correcting-big-digital-mistakes/#IDComment30463872</link>
<description>If your mistake took place in an email then a follow-up email is a good way to announce the correction. &amp;quot;Oops&amp;quot; messages tend to have better open rates due to the rubbernecking effect. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 02:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://churchcrunch.com/2009/08/10/barna-and-correcting-big-digital-mistakes/#IDComment30463872</guid>
</item><item>
<title>ChurchCrunch : Friend Request from Jesus - Relevant, Ridiculous, or Just Random?</title>
<link>http://churchcrunch.com/2009/08/05/friend-request-from-jesus-relevant-ridiculous-or-just-random/#IDComment29645818</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;ll give St. Giles credit for trying to be topical and clever. The real question is whether the community can back it up with a spirit of sharing and connectivity that a newcomer would associate with Facebook. I hope they pull it off in person. Their website (also listed on the sign) has an updated announcement on the home page, but not a lot of other content. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2009 03:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://churchcrunch.com/2009/08/05/friend-request-from-jesus-relevant-ridiculous-or-just-random/#IDComment29645818</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>
