Great smackdown. Especially loved this line:

"...you can’t seem to reason your way out of a wet paper sack, even with the aid of a chain-saw and an angry claustrophobic ferret."

Here's the thing. I don't care if they think I'm evil. These are people who think the universe exists to serve them. They've made a god out of ignorance as well as arrogance (not to be confused with pride). Seriously. Would you care if Charles Manson thought you were a shithead? Would you argue with & offer evidence to him? I wouldn't.

I would suggest not quoting the bible unless you know it because it can come back to bite you on your behind.

What I'd suggest is bluntly asking them if they're aware they're calling you immoral (many are ignorant & have no idea that the 'fool' in Psalms 14:1 & Psalms 53:1 is not an idiot, but some one who is immoral).

Or you could go with my first husband's response which was (in his snarkiest tone) "Learn that at church?".

You do realize that what you wrote is merely a reversal of Ray Comfort's belief that *all* atheists are merely pretending that the Christian god does not exist, yes?

That sucks. It looks like he's cutting & pasting your posts from the email subscription on Feedburner. The posts even have the unsubscribe link in them.

Wow. That's just mind boggling.

What makes this extra hilarious is that someone told him to put Zionist on the sign, but didn't bother to correct 'juice'.

Just clicked over to look around and I have a feeling I'm going to be installing it soon. It's New! It's Shiny! Resistance (by me) is Futile!

I think you need to be open to the idea that, after speaking with someone in detail, that further engagement is a waste of time. Like Daniel, I am not interested in much of anything Christians have to say. They rarely bring anything new to the table and are usually quite ignorant of the subject to begin with.

I disagree. These people interpret anything but absolute silence as persecution. If we are to have standards, they should be based on reasonable ideas unconnected to their possible reactions.

It should not be "we should do/not do this thing because they will cry wolf" but "we should do/not do this thing because [insert moral/ethical idea]". Anything else is giving them the upper hand.