<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Jeffrey Dale Starr's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.intensedebate.com/users/707555</link>
		<description>Comments by Jeffrey Dale Starr</description>
<item>
<title>Concrete Academic : The Wolf and the Lamb</title>
<link>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-wolf-and-the-lamb/#IDComment44558488</link>
<description>Phaedrus, I knew Aesop.  Aesop was a friend of mine.  And you&amp;#039;re no Aesop. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-wolf-and-the-lamb/#IDComment44558488</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Concrete Academic : The Value of Dynasties</title>
<link>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-value-of-dynasties/#IDComment44063279</link>
<description>Growing up in San Antonio rooting for the Spurs, I hate to admit it, but you&amp;#039;re right about them too.  I don&amp;#039;t think anyone&amp;#039;s knees wobble when they see them on the schedule.  In their heyday, I think the hated Detroit Pistons were much more intimitading (the image of Bill Laimbeer still churns my Spurs-loving gut). </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-value-of-dynasties/#IDComment44063279</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Concrete Academic : The Value of Dynasties</title>
<link>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-value-of-dynasties/#IDComment44062505</link>
<description>Great article, and I completely agree!  Another aspect of dynasties is that they bring out the best in their competition.  As a die-hard Cowboys fan, I was always frustrated that no matter how bad of a season the Detroit Lions were having, all of a sudden they turned into Lombardi&amp;#039;s Packers when they faced Big D (especially during the Aikman era).  If you&amp;#039;re some crummy team like the Chiefs, and you know you&amp;#039;re gonna end up with 3 wins or so, then New England or Indianapolis suddenly becomes the Super Bowl on your schedule.  You&amp;#039;ll rarely see a team unprepared when going up against a dynasty. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-value-of-dynasties/#IDComment44062505</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Concrete Academic : Nothing Means What You Think It Does</title>
<link>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/nothing-means-what-you-think-it-does/#IDComment43646170</link>
<description>Another great article.  I think what really supports what Eagleton was saying is the great challenge that faces anyone trying to become fluent in a foreign language (in my case, Japanese).  It&amp;#039;s one thing to learn the textbook version of a language, but then at some point you face the biggest hurdle - idioms.  Every language has them, and if taken at face value can be very confusing: &amp;quot;he went the whole nine yards&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;beating around the bush&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;don&amp;#039;t throw out the baby with the bathwater&amp;quot;.  I have always sympathized with anyone trying to learn English as a second language. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/nothing-means-what-you-think-it-does/#IDComment43646170</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Concrete Academic : Review of The Flaming Lips - "Embryonic"</title>
<link>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/review-of-the-flaming-lips-embryonic/#IDComment43505891</link>
<description>I was holding a Diet Coke (which is the case most of my waking hours) when I wrote the article, so it was the metaphor at hand...so to speak [groans from audience]. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/review-of-the-flaming-lips-embryonic/#IDComment43505891</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Concrete Academic : Loquacious Lemmings</title>
<link>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/loquacious-lemmings/#IDComment43130359</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t mind...I think it was great! </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/loquacious-lemmings/#IDComment43130359</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Concrete Academic : Loquacious Lemmings</title>
<link>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/loquacious-lemmings/#IDComment43067356</link>
<description>Vlad, that&amp;#039;s hilarious.  I had no idea that my article had been billed as &amp;quot;IKEA Sucks...&amp;quot;.  It might explain some of the visceral reaction - I guess if you love that store you might take it as a personal attack.  I think we should name our next article, &amp;quot;Why Strawberry Is The Worst Flavor Of Ice Cream&amp;quot;. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/loquacious-lemmings/#IDComment43067356</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Concrete Academic : The Industrial Revolution and the Death of Craftsmanship</title>
<link>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-industrial-revolution-and-the-death-of-craftsmanship/#IDComment42975259</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m not sure the expensive furniture can be sold any cheaper, to be honest. If it took you 3 months to hand-make a wardrobe, what would you charge for that? If you wanted to make a decent living, say $60k, you would have to charge $15k for that wardrobe. Who can afford that?    My beef is with the manufacturers of mass-produced furniture, who could dramatically increase their quality by reducing their profit margin. We&amp;#039;ve all heard enough stories about Nike shoes being made in the Far East for $3.00 and being sold to Americans for $125. Same idea. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-industrial-revolution-and-the-death-of-craftsmanship/#IDComment42975259</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Concrete Academic : The Industrial Revolution and the Death of Craftsmanship</title>
<link>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-industrial-revolution-and-the-death-of-craftsmanship/#IDComment42974998</link>
<description>Wrong.  I don&amp;#039;t look down on anyone buying these products.  I thought I made that clear.  I&amp;#039;m angry at the manufacturers who produce shoddy goods just to increase their profit margin.  You should be angry too.  And by the way, a lot of people seem to be making assumptions about who I am and where I come from.  I grew up among the &amp;quot;lower classes&amp;quot; I spoke of and am not ashamed of it.  Even now, I&amp;#039;m middle class at best.  I guess prejudice is alive and well. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-industrial-revolution-and-the-death-of-craftsmanship/#IDComment42974998</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Concrete Academic : The Industrial Revolution and the Death of Craftsmanship</title>
<link>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-industrial-revolution-and-the-death-of-craftsmanship/#IDComment42974732</link>
<description>You make a good point about the high price of quality merchandise.  And if an armoire takes 4 months to build, I guess the builder has to charge an exorbitant rate.  I guess there should just be a middle ground.  I think if manufacturers of mass produced furniture upgraded their quality, it might mean reducing their profit margin from 70% to 50%.  I just wish consumers would demand that sort of thing instead of just laying down and saying, &amp;quot;oh well, guess that&amp;#039;s just the way it is&amp;quot;. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-industrial-revolution-and-the-death-of-craftsmanship/#IDComment42974732</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Concrete Academic : The Industrial Revolution and the Death of Craftsmanship</title>
<link>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-industrial-revolution-and-the-death-of-craftsmanship/#IDComment42968153</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve personally never purchased anything from IKEA.  But out of necessity I do have a crummy fiberboard computer desk, because, yes it was all I could afford.  How does that make me a hypocrite?  The thrust of my article was not against consumers but a complaint against manufacturers trying to increase their profit margin by selling junk.  If you can&amp;#039;t comprehend that, I&amp;#039;m sorry for you. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-industrial-revolution-and-the-death-of-craftsmanship/#IDComment42968153</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Concrete Academic : The Industrial Revolution and the Death of Craftsmanship</title>
<link>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-industrial-revolution-and-the-death-of-craftsmanship/#IDComment42966026</link>
<description>Nice mis-quote.  I never said that someone should buy a piece of &amp;quot;super expensive&amp;quot; furniture.  Most people can&amp;#039;t afford &amp;quot;super expensive&amp;quot; anything.  I also wasn&amp;#039;t criticizing the masses for buying IKEA products.  I&amp;#039;m criticizing IKEA and their ilk for selling junk.  If that bothers you, you must own stock in the company or be suffering from extreme guilt because you know I&amp;#039;m right. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-industrial-revolution-and-the-death-of-craftsmanship/#IDComment42966026</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Concrete Academic : The Industrial Revolution and the Death of Craftsmanship</title>
<link>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-industrial-revolution-and-the-death-of-craftsmanship/#IDComment42965516</link>
<description>Again, I&amp;#039;m confused by the reaction to my article.  Don&amp;#039;t you think you should be getting higher-quality goods in exchange for your hard-earned dollars?  Personally, I don&amp;#039;t think forking out $150 for a piece of shelving is any real bargain.  I think for that price you should get a solid product made of quality wood that will last as long as you want it to.  The cheaper quality of wood (fiberboard is NOT wood) that you&amp;#039;re getting for your money should make you angry.  How does that make me a snob?  When our great-grandparents bought something they expected it to last.  Not because they paid a fortune, but because a few generations ago EVERYthing was built to last.  This isn&amp;#039;t about snobbery...it&amp;#039;s a lament about the death of quality.  That should make everyone angry...it&amp;#039;s not an elitist attitude. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-industrial-revolution-and-the-death-of-craftsmanship/#IDComment42965516</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Concrete Academic : The Industrial Revolution and the Death of Craftsmanship</title>
<link>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-industrial-revolution-and-the-death-of-craftsmanship/#IDComment42965022</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t understand these reactions portraying me as some kind of elitist.  I&amp;#039;m a middle class guy from a blue-collar background.  Defending the corporate behemoths that spoon-feed you garbage proves what a lemming you really are. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-industrial-revolution-and-the-death-of-craftsmanship/#IDComment42965022</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Concrete Academic : The Industrial Revolution and the Death of Craftsmanship</title>
<link>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-industrial-revolution-and-the-death-of-craftsmanship/#IDComment42962508</link>
<description>I didn&amp;#039;t mean to suggest that everyone should only buy handcrafted furniture.  In my article I point out that only the super-rich could really afford such things these days.  But you have to admit - 150 years ago, before there was any mass-produced crapola, even simple people like farmers had well-made stuff.  Even though it was cheap, it was still well made.  Now, there are two extremes of choice: 1) super expensive and well made or 2) affordable junk.  I&amp;#039;m not criticizing the average guy, I&amp;#039;m defending him - against being force-fed planned obsolescence. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-industrial-revolution-and-the-death-of-craftsmanship/#IDComment42962508</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Concrete Academic : The Industrial Revolution and the Death of Craftsmanship</title>
<link>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-industrial-revolution-and-the-death-of-craftsmanship/#IDComment42957679</link>
<description>In the spirit of full disclosure,  I own some of the junk I rail against.  Maybe guilt was part of my motivation! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/the-industrial-revolution-and-the-death-of-craftsmanship/#IDComment42957679</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Concrete Academic : A Self-Indulgent Musing on Jazz</title>
<link>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/a-self-indulgent-musing-on-jazz/#IDComment42677817</link>
<description>Nice article!  I had a similar experience as a teenager when an older friend gave me a copy of Ramsey Lewis&amp;#039; &amp;quot;The In Crowd&amp;quot;.  I said &amp;#039;thanks&amp;#039; and set it aside, with no real intention to ever listen to it.  But eventually I got bored with all the music I had, and was too broke to buy anything new, so I decided to give the jazz album a chance.  Ended up loving it and have been a fan ever since.  I think it&amp;#039;s like a lot of good things (coffee, asparagus, Shakespeare)...it just takes a certain age and maturity to appreciate jazz. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/a-self-indulgent-musing-on-jazz/#IDComment42677817</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Concrete Academic : Bibles and Bullets: The Ugly Legacy of "Christian" Missionaries</title>
<link>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/bibles-and-bullets-the-ugly-legacy-of-christian-missionaries/#IDComment42618924</link>
<description>Oh, Chunkster!  You&amp;#039;re such a card! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Nov 2009 23:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://concreteacademic.com/2009/11/bibles-and-bullets-the-ugly-legacy-of-christian-missionaries/#IDComment42618924</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>
