<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>humanist_xy's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.intensedebate.com/users/569063</link>
		<description>Comments by humanist_xy</description>
<item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Iranian Nuclear Scientist Slain, Sparking Accusations</title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/12/iranian-nuclear-scientist-slain-sparking-accusations/#IDComment51926270</link>
<description>The above URL is too long...just google the texe  ie &amp;quot;it is a sing of ....&amp;quot;  to find the post. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/12/iranian-nuclear-scientist-slain-sparking-accusations/#IDComment51926270</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Iranian Nuclear Scientist Slain, Sparking Accusations</title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/12/iranian-nuclear-scientist-slain-sparking-accusations/#IDComment51925569</link>
<description>I found something interesting on this subject  (using google)  Congresswoman Jane Harman, in an interview blames Iran for the assassination::  &amp;quot;....it&amp;#039;s a sign of desperation to start killing your own nuclear scientists....&amp;quot;  Read it in:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&amp;amp;orgId=574&amp;amp;topicId=100007193&amp;amp;docId=l:1106651471&amp;amp;isRss=true&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Acti...&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/12/iranian-nuclear-scientist-slain-sparking-accusations/#IDComment51925569</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Iranian Nuclear Scientist Slain, Sparking Accusations</title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/12/iranian-nuclear-scientist-slain-sparking-accusations/#IDComment51893086</link>
<description>Part 4  IF as a first step, the Iranian protestors show civility and maturity, ACCEPTING the WILL of the MAJORITY and stand behind (THEIR theocratic, backward and corrupt ) regime then, the plots of the neo-cons and warmongers might get botched away. Unfortunately that is a big IF.   Otherwise if they make the same mistake of Fatah in Palestine ie not accepting the result of a legitimate  election....then.... another Iraq tragedy is on the works.  IF the progressive anti-regime Iranians realize that history is in their side, by being PATIENT,  not in far future,  the opportunities will arise to establish a long-desired secular, civil and democratic system of government.... without any interventions from any of the outsider hegemonic villains. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/12/iranian-nuclear-scientist-slain-sparking-accusations/#IDComment51893086</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Iranian Nuclear Scientist Slain, Sparking Accusations</title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/12/iranian-nuclear-scientist-slain-sparking-accusations/#IDComment51893045</link>
<description>Part 3  The question is,....can Iranians  neutralize the sinister plots of the outsiders? At this point in time their chances of success is not high. The horizons are dark considering the current power of the corporate media, US  Congress,  Obama being in the white house, majority of the American public believing Iran is a (nuclear) threat and the enormous international resources being utilized to crash Iran, (100s of million dollars of budgeted cash and expert groups of saboteurs working full time on Iran).   Sadly the skies are getting darker day after day.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/12/iranian-nuclear-scientist-slain-sparking-accusations/#IDComment51893045</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Iranian Nuclear Scientist Slain, Sparking Accusations</title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/12/iranian-nuclear-scientist-slain-sparking-accusations/#IDComment51892999</link>
<description>Part 2  Nearly all reliable American polls and deductions from other mathematical Estimation techniques prove &amp;quot;with high level of confidence&amp;quot; that:   Ahmadinejad won the June election by a wide margin.   Then why the corporate media trumpeted  false claims and lies of &amp;ldquo;rigged&amp;rdquo; election and &amp;ldquo;widespread&amp;rdquo; fraud&amp;rdquo;?  The Anti-war analysts who have studied the &amp;ldquo;color revolutions&amp;rdquo;  see the hands of the foreign enemies of Iran in that event.(Google &amp;ldquo;effort to destabilize Iran&amp;rdquo; and read some of the revealing facts on such assertion)  The fears of  &amp;ldquo;war with Iran&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;instigation of a civil war in Iran&amp;rdquo; are still hovering around. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/12/iranian-nuclear-scientist-slain-sparking-accusations/#IDComment51892999</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Iranian Nuclear Scientist Slain, Sparking Accusations</title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/12/iranian-nuclear-scientist-slain-sparking-accusations/#IDComment51892933</link>
<description>Part 1 of 4  This scientist is not the only brainy Iranian killed this way and he might not be the last.  If you Google &amp;ldquo;assassination Egyptian Iraqi Iranian physicists&amp;rdquo; you might find some alarming facts. .  As far as I am aware, this scientists is the third Iranian casualty. Last year &amp;ldquo;...a world authority on magnetism..&amp;rdquo; was mysteriously killed. JP indirectly boasted it was a Mossad job. Also an Iranian (nuclear) scientist has been kidnapped by Saudis and handed over to CIA. Iran claims he is in a US prison.   No doubt Iran is  facing many formidable and determined foreign enemies.  If Iranians are smart they can neutralize some of  the plots of their enemies.   </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/12/iranian-nuclear-scientist-slain-sparking-accusations/#IDComment51892933</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : Nuclear Poker with Iran</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/buchanan/2010/01/04/nuclear-poker-with-iran/#IDComment50519593</link>
<description>Pat, do you know  Kenneth Timmerman  before the election mistakenly spilled the beans on the &amp;ldquo;Green Color for Iran&amp;rdquo;. (Understandably that illustrious significant post was (quickly?) deleted and can not be accessed on the Internet anymore) However a small part of it can be read here:  twf.org/News/Y2009/0621-Election.html  The plot to further de-legitimize and demonize the regime was concocted outside Iran using the occasion of the election. It must have been a cooperative extensive plot . The  universal well-coordinated false  trumpeting of &amp;ldquo;egregious widespread election fraud&amp;rdquo; by neo-cons, their stooges, Internet,  and their corrupt media is a compelling proof of the existence of such  plot.   Also ask yourself why Ari Ben Menashe, in &amp;ldquo;Profits of war&amp;rdquo; implies Mousavi&amp;rsquo;s friend was a CIA agent? Is such an allegation important?  Does all the pieces of puzzle fall in place neatly and nicely?  Isn&amp;rsquo;t all that worth a professional impartial  research? It might open a huge can of bloody worms. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Jan 2010 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/buchanan/2010/01/04/nuclear-poker-with-iran/#IDComment50519593</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : Nuclear Poker with Iran</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/buchanan/2010/01/04/nuclear-poker-with-iran/#IDComment50514611</link>
<description>.&amp;ldquo;....protesting a corrupt re-election of President Ahmadinejad....&amp;rdquo;?  Pat, you are gravely wrong on that. Let me explain.  American TFT and WOP polls, match very closely with the results published by Iranian Interior Ministry. Software for Head-Counts from demonstration photos prove, except in Tehran, Ahmadinejad attracted way more Flock than the opposition (According to the official election results Ahmadinejad lost in provinces of Tehran and Baluchestan).   Even ignoring a few Anti-Empire scholars who firmly believe there exists no authenticated proof of significant fraud in the election, the respected sources such as Leverett couples convincingly express the same conclusion.  Pat, many trust you and listen to you. Please, don&amp;rsquo;t fall in the dirty bloody trap of neo-cons. They are harming themselves and others because their vision is poisoned by racism, self-righteousness and hegemony....and they are determined to mercilessly annihilate anyone who dares to stand on their way.   Iran is their next victim.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Jan 2010 20:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/buchanan/2010/01/04/nuclear-poker-with-iran/#IDComment50514611</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : Nuclear Poker with Iran</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/buchanan/2010/01/04/nuclear-poker-with-iran/#IDComment50512437</link>
<description>Pat  might be expressing his honest thoughts, yet he is repeating the same biassed propaganda of the discredited neo-cons. Quite a few of his info are not right (US built reactor in Arak?) and his assertions on the election and protest demonstrations  are superficial and ignore the recent complex interferences of the foreign countries in Iran.  If he Googles &amp;ldquo; effort to destabilize Iran &amp;rdquo; he will get, among some trash, many credible, interesting (if not shocking) revelations.  Regardless, as an amateur student of the Iranian issues, I agree with his conclusion, simply because I consider dropping of  bombs or  unnecessary crippling sanctions (such as the pre 2003 Iraq case) are barbaric acts, acts that no one with a clear conscience can approve..  The past records of IRI are appalling , yet, in the recent years I have been witnessing the unfair and unjust treatment of Iran by its determined enemies.   It is hard to stay silent watching those bloody  plots in progress. We have to stop another unnecessary  war...another heinous crime just to satisfy the goals of a  few psychotic entities. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Jan 2010 19:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/buchanan/2010/01/04/nuclear-poker-with-iran/#IDComment50512437</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Massive Pro-Govt Rallies Reported in Iran</title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/12/30/massive-pro-govt-rallies-reported-in-iran/#IDComment49845634</link>
<description>Close Statistical analysis of two American polls on Iran sheds an important  illuminating light on the recent Iranian events.  One poll was conducted by Terror Free Tomorrow in May 2009 before the June election and the other was carried out by World Opinion Poll of the University of Maryland in September (after the election). Both of these polls match closely with the election data  published by the Iranian Interior Ministry.  So, Leverett couple were right in proclaiming &amp;ldquo;Ahmadinejad won (by a wide margin)&amp;rdquo;.  WOP created a shockwave, it rose a well founded suspicion that  the well orchestrated plot to USE the angry anti-regime Iranians and every other means available (such as their Iranian stooges, MEK,, Twitter, the Mass Media etc) was planned outside Iran by that country&amp;rsquo;s determined enemies.  The above polls and the media&amp;rsquo;s collectively identical deceptive characterization of Iranians issues deserve a closer analysis of the actual facts. That analysis might produce universally significant conclusions.  I suspect  the neocons might be pursuing more horrifying sinister plans, if not starting a war then instigating a CIVIL WAR. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/12/30/massive-pro-govt-rallies-reported-in-iran/#IDComment49845634</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : New Wars for the New Year?</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/pfaff/2009/12/29/new-wars-for-the-new-year/#IDComment49686328</link>
<description>part 1  &amp;quot;......  popular uprising, whose character is inexorably changing from protest at a rigged election....&amp;quot;?  Are you absolutely sure the June Elections was rigged as it was trumpeted by the neo-cons, their corrupt media and the rest of the Iranian enemies?  Do you believe in god? (Who lives up there) or you believe in science that rejects (and indirectly ridicules) all kinds of superstition such as gods and voodoos.  If you believe in gods then it is not easy to prove to you &amp;ldquo;god is a big lie&amp;rdquo;. Else, if you believe in sciences of Probability, Statistics, Game Theory and so on then you could easily conclude that the strong statistical  match of the two expensive American polls (TFT and WOP) are indisputable.   Science proves &amp;ldquo;Ahmadinejad won by a very wide margin&amp;rdquo;  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/pfaff/2009/12/29/new-wars-for-the-new-year/#IDComment49686328</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : New Wars for the New Year?</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/pfaff/2009/12/29/new-wars-for-the-new-year/#IDComment49686273</link>
<description>part 2  One poll was conducted by Terror Free Tomorrow in May 2009 and the other was carried out by World Opinion Poll of the University of Maryland in September. Both of these polls match closely by the data published by the Iranian Interior Ministry. The analysis of the three sets of data produces a confidence level of over 90%. (Each poll had a margin of error of 3.1% and one of the calculations   produces the overall Estimation error of less than 2%).   WOP created a strong shockwave, it rose a well founded suspicion that  the well orchestrated plot to USE the angry anti-regime Iranians and every other means available to them (such as their Iranian stooges, MEK,, Twitter, the Mass Media etc) was planned outside Iran by that country&amp;rsquo;s determined enemies.     </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/pfaff/2009/12/29/new-wars-for-the-new-year/#IDComment49686273</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Blog : <I>NYTimes</I> Floats the Case for Attacking Iran</title>
<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/12/25/nytimes-floats-the-case-for-attacking-iran/#IDComment49129790</link>
<description>My previous post  is also  relevant here: --------- As I see it, the problem is not Iran&amp;rsquo;s nuclear projects. The regime&amp;rsquo;s slow but steady advances in science and technology is unacceptable to the Empire which detests anyone who gradually gains fundamental independent power and  dares to stand on its way of dominating the world. ( &amp;ldquo;..they must be annihilated mercilessly....&amp;rdquo;)  The other problem with Iran is they morally and financially support Hezbollah and the Palestinians. .  Thanks to the masterwork of the biassed corrupt  media (such as NYT, WashPost, WSJ...) the majority of Americans are brainwashed to believe the two are terrorist groups (not as Philip Giraldi says &amp;ldquo;.. they are  the resistant anti-occupation movements...&amp;rdquo;).   Consequently I believe,  even if any logical, mutually beneficial solution is found for this nuclear hangup, the enemies of Iran will come up with NEW excuses. They, apart from inching towards destroying the Iranian factories  have the goal of  &amp;ldquo;changing the regime&amp;rdquo; and replacing it with a &amp;ldquo;friendly !&amp;rdquo; and  &amp;ldquo;democratic!&amp;rdquo; government.   -------  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 18:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/12/25/nytimes-floats-the-case-for-attacking-iran/#IDComment49129790</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Iran Willing to Perform Nuclear Exchange in Turkey</title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/12/25/iran-willing-to-perform-nuclear-exchange-in-turkey/#IDComment49125866</link>
<description>As I see it, the problem is not Iran&amp;rsquo;s nuclear projects. The regime&amp;rsquo;s slow but steady advances in science and technology is unacceptable to the Empire which detests anyone who gradually gains fundamental independent power and  dares to stand on its way of dominating the world. ( &amp;ldquo;..they must be annihilated mercilessly....&amp;rdquo;)  The other problem with Iran is they morally and financially support Hezbollah and the Palestinians. .  Thanks to the masterwork of the corporate media the majority of Americans are brainwashed to believe the two are terrorist groups (not as Philip Giraldi says &amp;ldquo;.. they are  the resistant anti-occupation movements...&amp;rdquo;).   Consequently I believe,  even if any logical, mutually beneficial solution is found for this nuclear hangup, the enemies of Iran will come up with NEW excuses. They, apart from inching towards destroying the Iranian factories  have the goal of  &amp;ldquo;changing the regime&amp;rdquo; and replacing it with a &amp;ldquo;friendly !&amp;rdquo;  &amp;ldquo;democratic!&amp;rdquo; government.   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 16:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/12/25/iran-willing-to-perform-nuclear-exchange-in-turkey/#IDComment49125866</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Senate Poised for Sanctions as Iran Rejects 'Deadline' Yet Again</title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/12/24/senate-poised-for-sanctions-as-iran-rejects-deadline-yet-again/#IDComment49026953</link>
<description>&amp;ldquo;The statistical analysis of 2 polls by Terror Free Tomorrow  (May 2009), WOP (September 2009) and the actual election results proves beyond any doubt that Ahmadinejad WON the June election by a WIDE margin&amp;rdquo;.  It seems the plan to USE  the dissatisfaction of  Iranian protestors (and all other means available)  for de-legitimizing the Iranian regime succeeded &amp;ldquo;beautifully&amp;rdquo;. Bibi  in an interview with Charlie Rose said &amp;ldquo;Iran is not the 800 Gorilla anymore. Same type of content was recently expressed by Israeli Intelligence chief:   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=114138&amp;amp;sectionid=351020101&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=114138&amp;amp;s...&lt;/a&gt;  With this phase II (crippling sanctions) one wonders what are the secret coordinated  intentions of the Iran&amp;rsquo;s enemies? Another war? Instigating a civil war in Iran?.......troubling qs.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 18:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/12/24/senate-poised-for-sanctions-as-iran-rejects-deadline-yet-again/#IDComment49026953</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Blog : Kristol Pivots from Afghanistan to Iran</title>
<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/12/11/kristol-pivots-from-afghanistan-to-iran/#IDComment47192059</link>
<description>To Henry Clemens  I fully agree with what you are saying about how children are indoctrinated in the schools. That is why I believe banning any kind of brainwashing of children in any institution deserves our ardent attention.  ...And....I fully respect your heartfelt beliefs and your  faith in Jesus. I see you as myself before university graduation. I totally lost my faith by studying science and careful reading of the Bible and other holy scriptures.  You must be a &amp;ldquo;good&amp;rdquo; man. I also wish you a Merry Christmas .....and a happy new year.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/12/11/kristol-pivots-from-afghanistan-to-iran/#IDComment47192059</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Blog : Kristol Pivots from Afghanistan to Iran</title>
<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/12/11/kristol-pivots-from-afghanistan-to-iran/#IDComment47026635</link>
<description>Science shows, indoctrination and brainwashing of children (mainly  in religious institutions) influences their behaviour over their entire life. As a relevant example if a Rabi drowns a Jewish child  in enormity of the heinous crimes of  Nazis causing his/her spine to quiver,  then it would be extremely difficult for him/her to escape from the effects of such indoctrination even if he/she develops a powerful analytical mind.  For instance, widely respected thinkers such as Chomsky or Finkelstein have exhibited slight biases when it comes to  ME issues.  Maybe De-indoctrination of warmongers, settlers, jihadist and those like Kristol is the most urgent task for humanity no matter if some wonder on the plausibility of such a task since it is in contradiction to our animality.   Maybe human beings are hopelessly self-destructive. Maybe they&amp;rsquo;ll keep on believing in god, voodoo and wars until their  time is up. I hope I&amp;rsquo;m proven to be wrong. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/12/11/kristol-pivots-from-afghanistan-to-iran/#IDComment47026635</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Blog : The (Many) Problems with the Iran Sanctions Bill</title>
<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/12/09/the-many-problems-with-the-iran-sanctions-bill/#IDComment46850195</link>
<description>Statistical analysis of  the two American TFT (Terror Free Tomorrow), WOP (World Opinion) polls  and the actual results published by Iranian Ministry of Interior has revealed astounding results.  Now there is  no doubt the election was legitimate and  if there were any irregularities they can be considered as &amp;ldquo; Statistically  Insignificant&amp;quot;, since the mismatch between the polls and real results are very small.  Now it is clear the genuine dissatisfactions of the followers of the Iranian Reform movement were USED by outside powers to de-legitimise the IRI and possibly pave the way for a war (as in Iraq). They astonishingly succeeded in convincing the sheep and impartial honest scholars alike that there was a definite fraud in the election..   The publication of WOP was a hard blow to the allegations of the corporate media. None of them withdrew from their contrived stance, they only changed their vocabulary. Now instead of &amp;ldquo;fraudulent&amp;rdquo; they use &amp;ldquo;disputed&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;contested&amp;rdquo; election. Some who always trumpet the war cries still use their old deceiving language to categorize the election as egregious </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/12/09/the-many-problems-with-the-iran-sanctions-bill/#IDComment46850195</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Blog : The (Many) Problems with the Iran Sanctions Bill</title>
<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/12/09/the-many-problems-with-the-iran-sanctions-bill/#IDComment46419640</link>
<description>Being acquainted with Iranian culture I tend to believe the claim that:   &amp;ldquo;during Iran-Iraq war, after 1000s of Iranian soldiers suffered  horrendous deaths due to Iraqi chemical bomb attacks, a  foreign company offered Iran the capability of producing similar chemical weapons. The Iranians rejected it on the moral grounds&amp;rdquo;.  I also believe they are not after the bomb. The intense Iranian desire for progress in technology is paramount. (Unless they are badly cornered to defend themselves)  I am also inclined to believe  if Iran stops the enrichment, some of Iran&amp;rsquo;s powerful adversaries  will come up with new excuses to hinder the progress of Iran. Also, the imprudent animosities of the West towards Iran is hindering it  from becoming a true democracy. By more pressure more and more Iranians are reluctantly joining the side of their medieval regime (as they did in 1979).    Is that what the warmongers in the West want? Hard to see the Iranian pictures clearly.    </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Dec 2009 19:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/12/09/the-many-problems-with-the-iran-sanctions-bill/#IDComment46419640</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : US, Iran Moving Again Toward Confrontation</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/lobe/2009/11/30/us-iran-moving-again-toward-confrontation/#IDComment45442779</link>
<description>This post is partly the reflection of the NYT style news, a mix of facts and half-truths ending with a fuzzy conclusion. In this web-site the audience expects views expressed from different humanistic perspectives.  Despite the fact that IRI is a backward theocratic ruling system, the relatively rapid industrial progress of Iran is utterly unacceptable to the gold-loving &amp;ldquo;hegemonies&amp;rdquo; who can only tolerate the obedient regimes.  Being neutral or passive with hegemonies without telling how they are using the false details to demonise or destroy their opponents is not acceptable here.   Iran is NOT building a nuclear weapon...and Iranians are NOT zealous suicidal lunatics. The rulers of Iran absolutely and explicitly know their country will be &amp;ldquo;obliterated&amp;rdquo; as soon as one of their Bombers takes off towards Israel or Europe carrying a nuke.  The West&amp;rsquo;s allegations and excuses in order to justify  hitting Iran hard are mainly trumpeted towards the sheep. The Anti-war audience can not buy a mix of facts, half-truth or lies. They know how the wars are staged.....they are anti WAR and against those who stage it...pure and simple.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Dec 2009 22:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/lobe/2009/11/30/us-iran-moving-again-toward-confrontation/#IDComment45442779</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>
