Wow, that was a great article Annie, thanks for sharing. What Politijim said is exactly how I feel about Gingrich, the article would be a great campaign tool for him.

This has turned into a huge problem for SBK. I know a lot of people won't agree with me but I didn't have a problem with their donations to PP, I also didn't have a problem when they pulled their donations. Their rules said no funding to organizations under investigation, PP was under investigation so they followed their rules. This is where the huge problem comes, IMO if they are willing to break their own rules in this instance because of pressure, what will stop them from breaking the rules any time they face an uncomfortable situation? This does not inspire confidence. They have put themselves into a no win situation, the left is angry because they don't feel the apology was heartfelt enough and SBK was vague about future funding, the right is mad because the they bowed under pressure. SBK will be feeling the fallout for a long time to come. They do a lot of good work, but by bowing under the political pressure the left applied, they managed to anger everyone. The ACS is a good and for breast cancer specifically, Avon is a pretty good choice.

Sorry about that, it's on the Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology... If that doesn't work, I got the article through Drudge.

Google is expanding its data collection, effective March 1st, WITH NO OPT OUT! If you use Google, please read this article. I also voted regarding closing accounts, at 6:33 pm the total vote was 6495 with 64% saying they will close their accounts. http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology....

I'll never forget how he called out the SCOTUS during his first SOU. Talk about a breach of decorum!

Google is expanding its data collection, effective March 1st, WITH NO OPT OUT! If you use Google, please read this article. I also voted regarding closing accounts, at 4:20 pm the total vote was 1848 with 64% saying they will close their accounts. http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology...

Fred Thompson endorses Newt Gingrich! "I have come to the growing realization that Newt Gingrich is the guy who can articulate what America is all about," Thompson said of the former House speaker on Fox News". http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/01/23/g...

Found this on Wikipedia, "but had trouble establishing its own positions in a consistent manner.[85] By mid-September 1994, polls showed the race to be approximately even.[75][86][87] Kennedy responded with a series of attack ads, which focused both on Romney's seemingly shifting political views on issues such as abortion and on the treatment of workers at the Ampad plant owned by Romney's Bain Capital.[75][88][89] The latter was effective in blunting Romney's momentum.[53]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitt_Romney

Gee, idiot mittens hasn't changed a bit since 1994.

Great way to put it Top, 75% anti Romney. After listening to talking heads today, I think some of them may be getting that we don't want another McCain, and we will vote the way we want, not the way the media and RNC is trying to "nudge" us.

Is the victory tonight by Newt Gingrich from his debate performances, or did the people of SC say HELL NO to the candidate chosen by the Republican party? There is no question that Newt did a great job in the debates, it was epic how he handled John King, but was that enough to close the large gap and go on to overtake Romney by so much? We know what happened in 2008 when the Republican party offered moderate John McCain, we lost. Conservatives are well aware of how the media and the left feel about them, are they seeing the Republican party feels the same way?