Recent profile visitors
daniel
- Rep: 17pWhat's this?
Strubb
- Rep: 4pWhat's this?
josh
- Rep: 73pWhat's this?
micah
- Rep: 54pWhat's this?
- Blog: Learn to Duck
- |
- Blog RSS
- Following 5 people total
- |
- View all
Following
Andrew Parker
- Rep: 12pWhat's this?
Tara Anderson
- Rep: 40pWhat's this?
- Blogs (2):
- I quit for Lijit

Brad Feld
- Rep: 78pWhat's this?
- Blog: Feld Thoughts
- |
- Blog RSS
josh
- Rep: 73pWhat's this?
David G. Cohen
- Rep: 69pWhat's this?
- Blog: Colorado Startups
- |
- Blog RSS

Last 5 comments by Fraser
That's future tense though. We're not there yet. But we're on the right path.
Growing a company with $20M revenue is tough. Growing from $20 - $100 is even more difficult. But the hardest is to continue to grow beyond $100M / year in revenue. It will be interesting to watch Sandvine over the coming year - they're at a difficult junction for any company.
And a junction, that unfortunately, Canadian companies have never been good at transcending.
For all it's entrepreneurial spirit Waterloo has not matched the output of other areas. Again, I believe this will change thanks to the foundation and support networks that many have built in the region.
I think it's easy to stereotype the entrepreneurial spirit that exists between the two countries. In fact, the difference between the stereotypes is a pressing issue. One that's regularly discussed in parliament, covered in the press, and articulated at start-up conferences throughout the country.
I am very familiar with Waterloo - I was born and raised in Hamilton and worked for a early-stage investment firm in the Golden Horseshoe area before making the move to NYC. We worked with a number of entities in the K-W region and they're building a wonderful start-up community.
Certainly UW, Communitech and other organizations are providing terrific support to the ecosystem within the region. And you definitely reference the major start-up success story (RIM) and there are other (less successful stories), such as Open Text, that exist.
But isn't it saying something when there's a single success story that we can reference? I think that's telling.
Surely their unconstrained aspirations are to build companies beyond $300M / year or to build a growth business that isn't purchased by a US firm.
The Stockdale Paradox is all about maintaining faith that you'll ultimately succeed while remaining grounded in the facts/reality.
For Canadian entrepreneurs the biggest fact/reality (that is: constraint) is that the start-up ecosystem in Canada can only support certain types and sizes of start-ups. Great Canadian entrepreneurs realize this and dream accordingly.
This is why I make the differentiation between entrepreneurship and entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurs in both countries are equally talented. The US system simply allows for (supports? enables?) grander entrepreneurship and thus the unbalance.