I does make absolute sense and therefore as usual Government has somehow found a way to mess it up. There are bureaucrats that can only survive in their positions if a large group of do nothing people remain 100% defendant on taxpayer handouts. This is a case where the host needs the parasite in order to thrive themselves.

If they do try and fix this loophole some whiny do-gooder will have a fit about it and explain why convicts need food stamps. With the economy in a shambles there are people out there that need a temporary hand but until we get the habitual sponges out of the way the people who through no fault of their own find themselves needing help will have trouble getting it. The system as it is now does a fine job of supporting a large group of useless people.

It is a real shame that he was no concealed carry permit holder then the police would not have to look for these dirt bags they would have found them where they lay. Check here to read about another victim that stood up for himself.
http://americanoutrage.us

In some ways I agree but if I felt I was about to be run over by my own SUV (like I think he did) I would have fired but if they were heading away from me no shots would be fired.

I only hope that people discover the truth before the damage is irreversible.

My question is more, why have an FBI surveillance office in a mall? Just who were they watching.

If they were stealing food from the market to feed their kids I could understand and even give them a pass BUT terrorizing the high seas by firing RPG's at cruise ships and un armed freighters is terrorism or an act of wan and these terrorists should be treated as such. I could possibly understand if they were robbing the ships and taking the contents to feed the Somali people but to hold people and property for ransom so a few can live like kings in mansions on the Somali coast leaves no question in my mind about their motive.

I'm sorry but if you think there is any justification to commit an armed robbery with a 9yo girl in tow you sir are a bigger nitwit than he is.

I have no problem with this gut wanting to dress as a woman, hell he can dress as a cow if he wants to in his personal life. What we have here is not a transgendered person but a guy that gets off by dressing as a woman and like any other guy his sexual desires should not be a part of his job. If when not acting in the role of Mayor he wants to dress as Mary Poppins more power to him but it should not be allowed while hes in office. If he was actually transgendered it would be a different story.