Wow. Thanks as I'm so honored!
Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®

I agree that the groups are reacting to current circumstances, but I still think they're lacking a clear, concise message point, along with a call to action. Because reporters can interview anyone and everyone, officially or unofficially representing the cause, drunk or sober, or until they find someone who agrees or disagrees with the story angle, the reaction is diluted by inconsistency. In a prior PR job, we referred to such group behavior as organized clusters! Thanks for your insights.

The saddest part about Weinergate isn't the behavior, the morality or the outcome. It's the divisiveness that continues to exist in this country as illustrated by comments on the topic. But then again, I support freedom of speech, so there you have it.

Once again, Lynn, you're officially the smartest person in the room, and with this particular comment, the voice of reason. It's just sad, sad, sad, and if I weren't so blessed, I'd really get depressed about it. As always, thanks for sharing your insights and wisdom.

Blaming your predecessor is commonplace in politics and the private sector, and it seems to be most prevalent among men, but of course, they're the ones most in power, but I digress. Again, this isn't a partisan issue; it's one of character and leadership. While playing "who's the biggest sinner?" seems entertaining, it's sad that we can play it at all, Thanks for commenting.

Thanks so much for sharing your viewpoints. A couple of thoughts: it's not about whether someone physically committed adultery or who from what political party did what and resigned - it's about the bigger picture of where do we, as a society, draw the moral line? You're right about technology and guns - if both are used responsibly, then there shouldn't be an issue. But the reality is that due to lack of personal moral responsibility, we can no longer depend on human beings to make appropriate decisions to rear healthy, balanced children, much less lead our country. As good as technology is in regard to things like medicine (then there's the Internet sale of class III narcotics), it also has enabled some people to display their behaviors (legal or not) in public ways that only contribute to the moral decay of this country. And you're right, hypocrisy is sickening. To quote somewhere in the Bible, let the first without sin cast the first stone........

Since I'm not a huge TV viewer, I trust your assessment of the talk shows. Spitzer interviewing Trump about Weiner sounds like a bad sitcom! Thanks for commenting.

I think it's the "ick" factor that makes such sordid headlines (and why do men think risque photos of themselves are attractive anyway?). It's also a topic that everybody quickly gets, can form an opinion and move on, unlike something like WMD, when some people don't even know what the acronym literally means or implies. Weiner knew he was lying when he went with the hacker theory; Bush, Powell, Rumsfield, etc., as well as nearly every European ally truly believed that WMDs were in Iraq, including intelligence supporting that from the previous administration - and no, I don't support remaining in Iraq because Americans shouldn't be fighting a tribal culture. While lying may be a standard skill set for politicians, tolerating it does nothing to improve the integrity of this country and its leadership. Thanks for commenting.

What's the saying - the higher they are, the harder the fall. Arnold must be in serious pain about now. Thanks for commenting!

Per Stew, who grew up in Holland in the 1960s, the royal family, going back to Wilhelmina, has always been a little on the goofy side. Goofy? It's downright unexplicable!