Christine thanks for your comment,

We offered amnesty in the 80's... The end result was seven times the number of illegals here waiting for another round of amnesty... If we were to offer amnesty now is there anything that would point to a different result in the future?

We already have guest worker programs in which many of those "jobs Americans wont do" are filled. Maybe we need to expand and increase the efficiency of those programs.

The bottom line is that America must get a grip on securing our borders, offering amnesty only undermines our efforts in doing that.

• 39 weeks ago

MFWIC: I agree with what you are saying in principle but in reality do you honestly think that President Bush has the political capital to be able to throw many punches at Iran? Personaly I don't think he does, and perhaps more importantly it doesn't look like Iran thinks he does either.

Thanks for commenting

• 39 weeks ago

I agree Daweb something must be done to stop Iran from further destabalizing Iraq. Question is not only who but how.

• 39 weeks ago

I agree completely. It has little if anything to do with the environment and a whole lot to do with the global redistribution of wealth.

• 39 weeks ago

Actually I posted about a a very similar scenerio just a few days ago... Think ti was "Don't count out Al". Essentially since neither Obama nor Hillary is likely to come away with enough delegates to win the nomination outright, it does open the door for someone else to step in to unite the party. Of everyone in the Dem Party only Gore has the name recognition and national profile to be able to step in this late in the game. I honestly don't see him teaming up with Hillary but Obama is a possability that is certainly plausable.

Thanks for stopping by.

• 40 weeks ago