clayclai

clayclai

-22p

16 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0

81 weeks ago @ Breitbart.tv - NAACP CEO: 'Black Pant... · 1 reply · +1 points

Where are you getting your information? The DOJ bought a lawsuit against 3 people, I seriously doubt they have 20. They don't even have a functioning website. Right now there biggest supporter is Fox News and the like otherwise nobody would have even heard of them.

81 weeks ago @ Breitbart.tv - NAACP CEO: 'Black Pant... · 0 replies · +1 points

Since al Qaeda with an estimated 500-1000 members has been the number one target of our trillion dollar military industrial complex for just about a decade now, I'm sure the New Black Panther Party, even if only 20 members, will be worth at least a new aircraft carrier and two more nuclear subs.

I must say, I find the level of discussion here amazing.

81 weeks ago @ Big Journalism - Finally: The ... · 0 replies · +1 points

That just means your browser sent a command to the apache server that it didn't understand.

81 weeks ago @ Big Journalism - Finally: The ... · 0 replies · +1 points

How do you conclude that the NAACP was "quite obviously enjoyed Shirley Sherrod’s tale of a white farmer getting screwed because he was white." ? I've watch the video several times now. At 0:53 after Sherrod says "While he was trying to show how superior he was to me, I was trying to decide how much help I was going to give him." There is a little laughter. But laughter at what? Laughter at the irony that he was "trying to show how superior he was" while she was trying to decide how much help to give him. But in no way can you conclude that they were supporting her discrimination back in 1984 because at 1:10 when she says "So I didn't give him the full force of what I could do." This statement is met by complete silence. No support from the audience, and isn't this when you would expect it, if they were 'racist.' Again biggovernment is distorting the facts to divide the people.

81 weeks ago @ Big Journalism - Finally: The ... · 0 replies · +1 points

How do you conclude that the NAACP was "quite obviously enjoyed Shirley Sherrod’s tale of a white farmer getting screwed because he was white." ? I've watch the video several times now. At 0:53 after Sherrod says "While he was trying to show how superior he was to me, I was trying to decide how much help I was going to give him." There is a little laughter. But laughter at what? Laughter at the irony that he was "trying to show how superior he was" while she was trying to decide how much help to give him. But in no way can you conclude that they were supporting her discrimination back in 1984 because at 1:10 when she says "So I didn't give him the full force of what I could do." This statement is met by complete silence. No support from the audience, and isn't this when you would expect it, if they were 'racist.' Again biggovernment is distorting the facts to divide the people.

81 weeks ago @ Big Hollywood - Entertainers Who Sprea... · 1 reply · 0 points

How do you conclude that the NAACP was "quite obviously enjoyed Shirley Sherrod’s tale of a white farmer getting screwed because he was white." ? I've watch the video several times now. At 0:53 after Sherrod says "While he was trying to show how superior he was to me, I was trying to decide how much help I was going to give him." There is a little laughter. But laughter at what? Laughter at the irony that he was "trying to show how superior he was" while she was trying to decide how much help to give him. But in no way can you conclude that they were supporting her discrimination back in 1984 because at 1:10 when she says "So I didn't give him the full force of what I could do." This statement is met by complete silence. No support from the audience, and isn't this when you would expect it, if they were 'racist.' Again biggovernment is distorting the facts to divide the people.

81 weeks ago @ Big Hollywood - Entertainers Who Sprea... · 1 reply · -1 points

Racism is far more than an individual opinion or statements. White racism is the culture, institutions and ideology that developed to it's highest level with the white Europeans, then white Americans through the genocide of the indigenousness people and the cultivation of the land by African Slaves.

In the last century the U.S. killed more than 3 million 'gooks' in Vietnam. That was a white racist war, meanly conducted by the U.S. There is no equivalent 'black racism.' Just not liking someone of a another color doesn't make you a racist. Racism is a question of power and black people don't have it. The problem wasn't that Bull Connor didn't like black people, the problem was that he was backed by a white racist establishment. This is still the problem today.

81 weeks ago @ Big Journalism - Finally: The ... · 0 replies · +1 points

How do you conclude that the NAACP was "quite obviously enjoyed Shirley Sherrod’s tale of a white farmer getting screwed because he was white." ? I've watch the video several times now. At 0:53 after Sherrod says "While he was trying to show how superior he was to me, I was trying to decide how much help I was going to give him." There is a little laughter. But laughter at what? Laughter at the irony that he was "trying to show how superior he was" while she was trying to decide how much help to give him. But in no way can you conclude that they were supporting her discrimination back in 1984 because at 1:10 when she says "So I didn't give him the full force of what I could do." This statement is met by complete silence. No support from the audience, and isn't this when you would expect it, if they were 'racist.' Again biggovernment is distorting the facts to divide the people.

81 weeks ago @ Big Journalism - Finally: The ... · 0 replies · 0 points

How do you conclude that the NAACP was "quite obviously enjoyed Shirley Sherrod’s tale of a white farmer getting screwed because he was white." ? I've watch the video several times now. At 0:53 after Sherrod says "While he was trying to show how superior he was to me, I was trying to decide how much help I was going to give him." There is a little laughter. But laughter at what? Laughter at the irony that he was "trying to show how superior he was" while she was trying to decide how much help to give him. But in no way can you conclude that they were supporting her discrimination back in 1984 because at 1:10 when she says "So I didn't give him the full force of what I could do." This statement is met by complete silence. No support from the audience, and isn't this when you would expect it, if they were 'racist.' Again biggovernment is distorting the facts to divide the people.

81 weeks ago @ Big Journalism - Finally: The ... · 2 replies · +1 points

Have you ever been to the right-wing anti-war rally? No because the right-wing loves war and all it's destruction. Has there ever been a war that the right-wing didn't like. Was there ever a U.S. war that was racists? How about killing chinks in Korea, gooks in Vietnam or hadgies in Iraq?