Moore was one of Barack's most vocal, ardent cheerleaders once upon a time. He went berserk with tweets against Obama about Libya in March, and now THIS. The bloom is off the commie rose... please pass the pork rinds and Twinkies.

You're hilarious, thanks so much for the laughs.

Are you sure you meant to type "Buckwheat controlled website"? Or did you mean it to read "Cream of Wheat controlled website"? Or, "Wheaties controlled website"? Or, '"Wheat Field with Cypresses controlled website"? Or, "Wil Wheaton controlled website"? Am never sure with you libs.

Oh, my - hilarious. Nearly doused my keyboard with coffee while reading this.

Fact: Every single bit of Barack Obama's school records from elementary school through Harvard have been locked up so that the public cannot view them, and it is believed he performed poorly and/or flunked many of his classes in high school and at Columbia U and Harvard. It is also believed that had it not been for influential people in the Chicago machine, he would have never been appointed to be in charge of the Harvard Law Review (his writing abilities are grotesquely inferior to his predecessors) nor groomed for Illinois politics. May have not graduated at all.

Fact: The bronze statue of Obama as a young boy that was erected in Jakarta, Indonesia in his honor has been forcibly removed by a majority of citizens who are disenchanted with him.

Where was Pelosi's outrage when Democrat State Rep. Janis Baird Sontany of Tennessee implied that Republican women are drag queens when she said 'you have to lift their skirts to find out if they're women'? Where was the outrage when Democrat, now-ex congressman, Rep. Allen Grayson of Florida called Republicans Nazis, Al-Qaeda terrorists, murderers, vampires, racists, whores, and friends of Satan? Pelosi embraces the liberal, violent, vandalizing, defecating-on-police-cars Occupy Wall Street protestors (she recently told God to bless them). She herself has said that the protests of the tea party movement are unpatriotic and has done her fair share of vicious name-calling against the American tea party movement for years, and Rep. Maxine Waters has demanded that the tea party 'go to hell'. Harry Reid and others in Congress have also said despicable things against tea partiers. Not a peep of outrage from the Democrats on this, and as a conservative woman, I'm offended that members of my government decry me and millions of other American citizens for peacefully exercising our freedom of speech and for wanting our elected officials to be more fiscally responsible and less power-grabbing.

What Brown did is such a silly non-issue (and Warren threw the first cow patty), it's laughable that the Democrats are whipping themselves into a drama queen faux frenzy over it. Boo hoo, grow up - save the outcry for things that are real atrocities and misogyny, not puffed up nonsense like this is, SanFranNan. You can be outraged when the Democrats lose the Senate in 2012, and Pres. Zero is booted from the Oval Office.

Desperation, thy name is Democrat party.

Amen to that - the more I read about Cain, the more impressed I become. His performance in the Florida debate and in the straw poll was better than anyone expected. He's a smart business man with conservative principles who embraces the Constitution. So far, so good - just waiting for Team Obama to fabricate some kind of dirt on him.

Ditto that. I'm weary of being called a racist, a Nazi, a terrorist. Apologies are worthless at this point - the damage has been done with this administration viciously attacking the majority of law-abiding, patriotic Americans. Only a meek victim would accept the apology of a soulless wife beater, a rapist, a thug. Americans are NOT victims.

The 2012 election will serve its purpose by soundly booting out the statist miscreants.

Despite the sad, obvious omission in this article of the current POTUS and the water-carrying media that still covers for him, paints his tiresome platitudes as glowing, ignores his gaffes and blunders, and still throws him metaphorical softballs in interviews, this article has some redeeming elements. The "mainstream news outlets have less influence than ever" statement is spot-on.

More Americans are abandoning the extreme leftwing media sources like MSNBC and are turning to right-of-center sources like news aggregates and conservative/nonpartisan blogs. A majority of Americans consider themselves conservative or moderate, yet the majority of the US mainstream media sources are liberal and are deaf to the escalating concerns of the majority of Americans in regards to the nation's economy, unemployment, the housing market, the debt ceiling, etc. The press can ignore the war in Libya all it wants - more Americans than ever are engaged in what is going on in Washington, so they are not dependent on Brian Williams or Cooper Anderson or Chris Matthews or Rachel Maddow or Matt Lauer or Lawrence O'Donnell to shape their thinking, to fill their brain cells. The information is indeed out there, just not on the dying mainstream media networks. Thanks to the Internet, the power of the American liberal press has been diminishing for quite some time.

The statist press, for the most part, will ignore or whitewash anti-war protests during Obama's presidency (watch that change overnight, however, when Obama is booted out of office in 2012 - NYT and other liberal media bashed Bush daily on the Congress-approved wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, showcased many anti-Bush/anti-war rallies, but are virtually silent now about Obama's troubling actions in Libya).

Cynical and spot-on.

*Sad face with a high-five to Willow_DeWisp.*

You're absolutely right. Among other devious methods of fallacious argumentation, Media Matters is employing what is known as "denying the antecedent." It draws a conclusion from premises that do not support that conclusion. Here's an example:

Argument: If it is snowing outside, it must be cold. It is not snowing outside. Therefore, it is not cold.
Problem: There does not have to be snow in order for it to be cold outside.

Here is what Media Matters is doing in presenting its fallacious argument:

Argument: If women do not receive preventive health care, they will die. Planned Parenthood provides women's preventive health care. New laws will defund Planned Parenthood. Therefore, women will die.
Problem: There are many other resources beyond Planned Parenthood that provide preventive health care for women.

Not half as bad as the Duffer in Chief screwing up the names of living and dead Medal of Honor winners, but still a head shaker. One that the Obama-fawning media will minimize or flatly not cover... they're still pouring over Sarah Palin's 20,000-plus emails for a teaspoon of dirt. It's PRIORITIES, man...