Troy,

If you are so big on people/companies having their "day in court" and "innocent until proven guilty", why would you call JSS Tripler a ponzi?

Just like Zeek, they claim to have a "compliance team".

Just like Zeek, they advise members to avoid terms like invest, compound, etc.

Just like Zeek, they claim they are selling a product/service. With Zeek it was bids. With JSS Tripler, it's "advertising packages".

And just like Zeek, they offer an ROI on your "purchase" that is greater than 1% per day, but is not "guaranteed"(wink-wink-nudge-nudge).

Gee, what an absolute shock that Mr. Craddock left out that small detail about SNR Denton not actually representing all the affiliates that he is soliciting money from.

Even though you did mention it in your second video, I think it bears repeating in print as it was finally updated on the zteambiz site.

"SNR Denton’s legal representation is limited to Fun Club USA; SNR Denton does not represent and does not have an attorney-client relationship with affiliates of Zeek, Zeek Rewards, Rex Venture Group LLC or with any individual or party that chooses to provide funds to Fun Club USA."

More lies and deception fed to the Zeek affiliates with the help of MLMHelpDesk.

Great idea to trust the guy that lied to HubPages about trademark and copyright infringements in a failed attempt to get KS Chang's hub permanently removed.

You call it a class action suit Troy. What is it, a class twelve?

Also, how can a law firm bill a client for calls from people that they don't represent? If that's the case, maybe all the Zeek critics will start calling them asking questions posing as members who have signed on to Fun Club's little scheme. That should drain the retainer pretty quick.

You really aren't doing these affiliates any favor by pushing them towards people like Craddock, Disner, and company. Whether intentionally or not, that is exactly what you are doing.

You had a number of posts to your YouTube videos spouting the same nonsense.

Whether or not someone is going to launch something with a similar name or not doesn't matter.

The ponzi regulars have probably already found their next one.

If they got in earlier enough, they pulled out their seed money and milked the house money for all they could before it was shut down.

If they got in too late to profit, they knew better than to invest more than they could afford to lose and some even stay on top of the refund process so that they can get their "spend" back and throw it into their next ponzi game.

Whether this new Zeek launches or not, there are already several knockoffs for the players to choose from.

Given the dollar amounts and highly visible nature of the Zeek ponzi, I think you will get to see your trial. You seem to have the false impression that Paul's deal with the SEC precludes criminal actions.

Here is a recent blurb that PPBlog just posted over at BehindMLM highlighting the fact that criminal proceedings started quite a while after the freezing of assets.

"On a side note, the ASD case started as a CIVIL case with a parallel criminal investigation. The civil seizure of 15 ASD-related bank accounts by the Secret Service occurred on Aug. 1, 2008.

The grand jury that indicted Andy Bowdoin did not begin to meet until May 2009, 10 months after the seizure. The indictment itself was not unsealed until November 2010, basically a year and a half after the grand jury was empaneled.

It is clear from both the civil and criminal documentation that ONE of the Feds’ goals was to expose the wink-nod nature of these schemes."

For whatever reason, this comment system is flaky on my end. Keep getting session expired messages, so I try one here.

Troy, do you believe that Paul Burks fabricating the daily RPP payout percentage is "doing everything they thought was needed to stay inside the letter of the law."

LOL, welcome to Ponzi Land, Troy.

The type of stuff critics deal with every day.

Geez Troy.

Is it the Zeek situation that's blowing up your site or some other issue?

Talk about timing.

Good luck.