Only the uninformed who hear only what they are told by Dems will support this "health reform". Obama's either the most idiotic president for thinking his plan will actually help Americans, or he's the most self-serving president to use this to increase his own power. He would not want to use his own health care services if this passes, I'd bet.
He's worried Americans will see through his "reform" before he gets the chance to pass it. I can see no other need for him to rush it's passing in such a panicked way.

Why would people want leaders who already have too much power having more by a one-world currency, then government...?

I'll be going to my first TEA party tomorrow (well, later today I guess! haha)! Happy Independence day!!

I agree we ought to live each day as though it were our last, but to say, "2012 is it!" could not be true.

"No one knows the day nor the hour." There's Scripture right there for ya! :)

It wouldn't surprise me if Obama starts his dictatorship with phony elections like Iran's.

So Obama should try and recruit as many people to HIS opinion rather than represent OUR opinion? Interesting...

So "his" true identity which "he" is honoring is NOT the one she was born with? The one she has genes for? (Telling her that actually, she is a woman despite any inclinations she feels?)
One cannot change the gender he truly is by desiring it to be something else.

Also, to refute Mr. Stiles, time doesn't have anything to do with credibility. Russia's socialism lasted a while, but no one claims that as proof of how "well" it worked for the country...

Global warming seems a ploy to get money more than anything. Even if the earth is gradually getting warmer since we've begun recording temperatures (which isn't that long), the earth's climate probably goes in cycles like the seasons. It makes sense. (The scientists in the article support this idea.)
Worrying about something like global warming which is not scientifically backed, as the scientists in this article would agree, is absurd. Besides, how can "carbon emissions" be bad for vegetation when plants need CO2 to produce oxygen?
The article says it all. Too bad liberals tend not to examine this or use logic.