Talk about someone whose fifteen minutes of infamy have long passed.
This little man with a loud mouth has nothing to offer…yet remains the
darling of liberals (aka progressives for this too ashamed of former name)
filled with partisan hatred.

His greatest claim to fame is being known as the court jester at the Playboy
Mansion for the amusement of “Hef”…and paid with the services of the
the concubines, so lacking in self-esteem they give of themselves at the
pleasure of this octogenarian…and whoever they are instructed to service.

The just ‘reward’ for loud mouth Maher would be getting called out by Todd Palin.
Since Maher is so tough on Gov. Palin, think he could match his bravado with Todd?
Your thoughts? ajbruno14@gmail.com

And, we keep paying the majority of the cost...Collectively, our govt is NUTZ!

Google is like every quasi business who seek govt sanctuary for political contributions. and come across with this
'holier than thou' attitude.

I'll believe Schmidt when he opens up the doors to organized labor....but don't bet on that by him or Gates or Jobs.

What is almost criminal is how the largest revenue generators and employers, gas, coal, and oil are being hammered and not allowed to grow...while the smug Mr. Schmidt proudly pays 3%....

ajbruno14@gmail.com

Here is a question which has yet to be asked to the Mexican govt. Why can't they provide jobs to their own citizens.
It is criminal millions that Mexicans cannot earn a living in their homeland, and have to leave their families due to
the failure of the same govt quick to criticize other countries.
Typical diversion to deflect responsibility once taking political office, Sadly, this works time and again.
ajbruno14gmail.com

When will we see reports on Tiger's Dad, Earl. There has been speculation the
Tiger hasn't behaved any differently than his Dad did.
Imagine the joke of Nike for using this promotional angle if/when this become
reported.
If I were advising Woods/Nike, I would offer similar ad, but use his Mom.
Nough said.............

One of the great "victories" of the Democratic Party has been its ability to keep the Black community capture, on what has been called the 'Liberal Plantation'.
With a 90% plurality in Black districts election after election, campaigns are
pointless and a waste of money.

I could understand this success if it was supported with concrete evidence that by voting in lock-step with one party these constituents were well-served. But, this is not the case. Poverty and quality of schools are worse in entrenched Democratic voting block.

Generally, most Blacks have not advanced as rapidly or frequently as immigrants, especially Asians, who arrived here in recent years, and with the disadvantage of language as another obstacle. The only area where a measure of success can be seen is working for the government.

I have to credit the Democrats, for several decades they have been successful to cast blame on the GOP for all discord in the Black community.

Black Conservative voices must provide a strong, persuasive case using the decades of evidence to support them. Until this occurs millions of Blacks will remain a permanent underclass, "thriving" on the plantation.
ajbruno14@gmail.com

Newspapers continue to fail because they have not done the one thing required to survive, give readers MORE, not less.
Their executives reduce content and are surprised their readership falls.

Its easy to point to cable news and the Internet, but unless newspapers provide the public to read their paper, they might as well shut their doors.

I think the problem with the failure of print media is its failure to be competitive. Yes, "new" media and the Internet are strong challengers, but blur the vision of the Mgt of print. Print fails to provide value to its former subscribers. They continue to cut content yet seem surprised people decide to cxl subscription. And, their response is to write editorials
of the cost of competing, never telling readers why the paper has value!
Worse is that most of the failures are in cities which have little if any print competition!

It may be more than a coincidence that so many which are failing have a Liberal approach to business, and the two which are successful are the WSJ and USA Today.

I have suggested that newspapers model themselves after magazines, where each issue covers all the topics, rather
than each differing from the day before. Unfortunately, such a suggestion fell on deaf ears.

Anthony Bruno