The men who committed the crimes and covered them up should have been brought to justice. Now, who runs the Department of Justice? Who failed us, the American Citizens, in the pursuit of justice?

Now, are you proposing that "they" (the government) should come for all Catholics? Why? Because a small fraction of the clergy failed to live up to the teachings of the Catholic Church?

You do realize these are the arguments of a fool, right?

"Very pleased," was how Sister Carol Keehan, president of the Catholic Health Association,

So who is Sr. Keehan? Apparently, another right-to-murder heretic that formally cooperates with direct abortion (http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/2010/jun/10060413).

The penalty for formal cooperation with direct abortion is latae sententiae excommunication. Sr. Keehan has apparently separated herself from the Church. As an outsider, why should anyone care if Sr. is pleased?

In fact, if a demonstrated heretic thinks something is good, maybe it is bad.

Leave it to the Dissociated Press to dig up a heretical nun to offer an "official" Catholic position. Great job bozos.

expiration of Bush-era tax cuts for people in the upper brackets.

More class warfare. Get the rich! Punish those that work hard! Steal from the "have's" to pay the work-nots.

People who get money from the gubmint and are unwilling to work are really nothing more than serfs and are receiving stolen property. They are being used as useful idiots and tools for the left.

And by the way, the real unemployment rate is not anywhere close to 8.9% or 8.3% -- it is well over 10% -- look around you. Who you going to believe? Obama or your lying eyes?

"This isn't a Catholic issue, this is a freedom issue," Coulter told the audience.

This is all that need be said.

Too late H. You already demonstrated you will to trample on the Establishment Clause. Even in your fantasy world where you believe you control the consequences of actions, you can not undo this. You are now generally seen as a threat to our religious liberty. Some of us knew it all along.

And why do I have to take money from my family and pay for a stranger's birth control in the form of higher insurance premiums? Because the government says so? Where's the constitutional authority for that?

The White House seemed to be caught flatfooted.

H, his krewe and our fellow citizens that think like him live in a fantasy land. They truly believe that they can choose the consequences of their action. This is why they believe it is OK to murder an unborn child after the choice of having sex has been made. H is flat-footed here because reality is asserting itself through people that value the 1st Amendment and he is truly not capable to line up with it because he is blinded by error, ideology, and arrogance.

For H and his krewe, errors and ideology trump reason and for them, the ends justify the means.It is the adaptation of 1930's style German Utilitarianism to the 21st century. Everyone who demonstrates the errors that H demonstrates needs to be voted out in November.

Too late H. You already demonstrated you will to trample on the Establishment Clause. Even in your fantasy world where you believe you control the consequences of actions, you can not undo this. You are now generally seen as a threat to our religious liberty. Some of us knew it all along.

And why do I have to take money from my family and pay for a stranger's birth control in the form of higher insurance premiums? Because the government says so? Where's the constitutional authority for that?

Administration officials say providing birth control is going to save money in the long run for insurers, because it's a lot cheaper than the costs of labor and delivery.

Folks, this is the utilitarianism arguments used by Margaret Sanger and her ilk in the 1930s.

The Roman Catholic Church is opposed to artificial birth control methods, but polls show that the faithful in the pews generally use contraceptives anyway

To a moral relativist with an ends justifies the means mentality, this statement is significant. In the real world where normal people live, where there is objective right and wrong, the actions of individuals ignoring a teaching does not nullify the teaching. If it did, then speeding would no longer be illegal.

These arguments from H and his Krewe are of people that are trying to play us for fools.

And his religion, secularism.

You'll never get an answer from the murderer-in-chief. This is a man who told us that he is willing to murder his own unborn grandchild. Remember his comment "I don't want my daughter punished with a baby". Next, we have his comment about when life begins -- "above my pay grade". Fine. He's not sure. Well, if one is not sure there is human life, then one errors on the side of life. Any other actions is a wanton display of manifest homicidal intent. Certainly, one does not embrace an action (direct abortion) that yields death 100% of the time -- unless one is a pathological liar.

H and is krewe trot out the same sophistry that was used by Margaret Sanger and her ilk in the 1930s. It is the same utilitarian mindset that led to the slaughter of millions of innocents.