<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Wsorrian's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.intensedebate.com/users/550261</link>
		<description>Comments by Wsorrian</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Maher: 'Who The F**k Is Saul Alinsky?' </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/maher-who-the-fk-is-saul-alinsky/#IDComment284162222</link>
<description>Nice try moron. You&amp;#039;re deflecting because you can&amp;#039;t argue on principle. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 5 Feb 2012 02:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/maher-who-the-fk-is-saul-alinsky/#IDComment284162222</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Maher: 'Who The F**k Is Saul Alinsky?' </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/maher-who-the-fk-is-saul-alinsky/#IDComment278217954</link>
<description>They aren&amp;#039;t. You&amp;#039;re just either a smug condescending moron with the intellectual capacity of soap scum, or you actually confused viceral hatred of a man who advocated violence against conservatives with that of idol worship.  I doubt you followed that or at the very least, you had to read it 3 or 4 times. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/maher-who-the-fk-is-saul-alinsky/#IDComment278217954</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Maher: 'Who The F**k Is Saul Alinsky?' </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/maher-who-the-fk-is-saul-alinsky/#IDComment277471833</link>
<description>Way to carry vomit another ridiculous liberal meme. I see you get all the marching orders quickly. It wasn&amp;#039;t even two days ago I was reading about some idiots on the left accusing the right of secretly being in love with Alinksky&amp;#039;s instruction manual and now....here you are. You&amp;#039;re so transparent... </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 06:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/maher-who-the-fk-is-saul-alinsky/#IDComment277471833</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Local Wisconsin Media Downplays Pro-Walker Rally</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/mchastain/2012/01/23/local-wisconsin-media-downplays-pro-walker-rally/#IDComment272621030</link>
<description>God, please give Indiepalin HIV.  Amen. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 02:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/mchastain/2012/01/23/local-wisconsin-media-downplays-pro-walker-rally/#IDComment272621030</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : 26-Dec-11 World View -- Christmas Church Bombings by Boko Haram Trigger Clashes in Nigeria</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/jxenakis/2011/12/26/26-dec-11-world-view-christmas-church-bombings-by-boko-haram-trigger-clashes-in-nigeria/#IDComment250629733</link>
<description>As opposed to protraying it as the ludicrous conspiracy theories do? Like how the King David Hotel scenario is intentionally misrepresented? The USS Liberty? Yes please tell us how Israel should be portrayed. Not as the tiny country surrounded by nations who want to slit the throat of every citizen - doing what it must to survive - but as the rogue nation that flaunts all logic by attacking it&amp;#039;s alleged &amp;quot;meal ticket.&amp;quot; Several times even, according to the last Alex Jones sponsored tally.  The problem isn&amp;#039;t that these sites won&amp;#039;t protray Israel negatively. The problem is that your perceptions are molded by conspiracy theorists overactive imaginations. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 08:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/jxenakis/2011/12/26/26-dec-11-world-view-christmas-church-bombings-by-boko-haram-trigger-clashes-in-nigeria/#IDComment250629733</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : 26-Dec-11 World View -- Christmas Church Bombings by Boko Haram Trigger Clashes in Nigeria</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/jxenakis/2011/12/26/26-dec-11-world-view-christmas-church-bombings-by-boko-haram-trigger-clashes-in-nigeria/#IDComment248301355</link>
<description>So why should they be critical of Israel when Israel had the police crackdown on the ones who are trying to force the same policies that &amp;quot;the Bigs&amp;quot; have criticized Muslim men for doing?  Did you not think that through before you posted it? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 06:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/jxenakis/2011/12/26/26-dec-11-world-view-christmas-church-bombings-by-boko-haram-trigger-clashes-in-nigeria/#IDComment248301355</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Chuck Woolery Takes On Obama's Class Warfare</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/chuck-woolery-takes-on-obamas-class-warfare/#IDComment241897731</link>
<description>As opposed to Pelosi, Obama, Grayson, Wasserman-Shultz, entire MSNBC lineup (especially Al Sharpton), 98% of CNN, &amp;lt;ABC unavailable due to nap time&amp;gt;, all of CBS, etc. being the talking heads of the &amp;quot;SANE&amp;quot; part of the country.  Isn&amp;#039;t it funny how moron leftists actually speak as thought they believe themselves to be a majority when they&amp;#039;re actually outnumbered 2:1 in the most generous assessments? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/chuck-woolery-takes-on-obamas-class-warfare/#IDComment241897731</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Chuck Woolery Takes On Obama's Class Warfare</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/chuck-woolery-takes-on-obamas-class-warfare/#IDComment241893383</link>
<description>Since you claim you aren&amp;#039;t even from the U.S., how about you stay the $%#&amp;amp; out of our political business, you troll. Ron Paul is a foreign policy nightmare. If he gets the nomination our allies across the globe will start to become wary of us and our enemies across the globe will become emboldened at the thought of an isolationist crackpot becoming the U.S. President.  So great, Ron Paul magically solves the fiscal problems (which are vastly overstated), but then we end up spending trillions more digging Europe out of it&amp;#039;s Islamist invasion that was accelerated by Ron Paul believing they would play nice if we ignored them. Ron Paul won&amp;#039;t even try to fix our own borders, so why should I think that he&amp;#039;d do anything to help our friends with their own coordinated attack from corrupt foreign regimes like the Mexican Government.  Dr.Jekyll is an okay person, but Mr.Hyde...not so much. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/chuck-woolery-takes-on-obamas-class-warfare/#IDComment241893383</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : The Breitbart Epiphany: <em>NYT's</em> #OccupyWallStreet Reporter Says Goodbye to Objectivity </title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2011/11/15/the-breitbart-epiphany-nyts-occupywallstreet-reporter-says-goodbye-to-objectivity/#IDComment222992463</link>
<description>Your mom thinks she should have aborted. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2011/11/15/the-breitbart-epiphany-nyts-occupywallstreet-reporter-says-goodbye-to-objectivity/#IDComment222992463</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : CNN Suggests Cain 'Sissy Pizza' Comment Indicates He's Hostile to Women</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/cnn-suggests-cain-sissy-pizza-comment-indicates-hes-hostile-to-women/#IDComment222203025</link>
<description>And your boyfriend is some sort of foreign policy genius? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/cnn-suggests-cain-sissy-pizza-comment-indicates-hes-hostile-to-women/#IDComment222203025</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : #OccupyDenver Comes Back For More; Schooled By Conservative Bloggers At BlogCon</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/occupydenver-comes-back-for-more-schooled-by-conservative-bloggers-at-blogcon/#IDComment220761416</link>
<description>Oh ffs....  You tarnished your credibility with your ignorance of what Isolationism is, but now you lost it all with the conspiracy theories.  I can already here the cries of &amp;quot;EVILLLLL JOOOOOS!!!!!&amp;quot;  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 06:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/occupydenver-comes-back-for-more-schooled-by-conservative-bloggers-at-blogcon/#IDComment220761416</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : #OccupyDenver Comes Back For More; Schooled By Conservative Bloggers At BlogCon</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/occupydenver-comes-back-for-more-schooled-by-conservative-bloggers-at-blogcon/#IDComment220760090</link>
<description>That&amp;#039;s a load of crap. First of all, Muslims have been railing against Western countries long before the 30&amp;#039;s and it&amp;#039;s only change came years later. So that has little to do with anything.  Secondly, you can&amp;#039;t claim it was Isolationism simply because it wasn&amp;#039;t Isolationism as extreme as Ron Paul&amp;#039;s version. Third, Muslims have repeatedly told us exactly why they hate us and I don&amp;#039;t believe I&amp;#039;ve ever heard one say it was because of the free military protection they benefit from. They told us it was because of our support for Israel and our open lifestyles.  Paul doesn&amp;#039;t get a pass on this subject... </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 06:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/occupydenver-comes-back-for-more-schooled-by-conservative-bloggers-at-blogcon/#IDComment220760090</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Gingrich Hammers NBC News' Curry, Media Over Cain Obsession</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/gingrich-hammers-nbc-news-curry-media-over-cain-obsession/#IDComment218278469</link>
<description>You&amp;#039;re just THAT dumb, aren&amp;#039;t you? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Nov 2011 19:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/gingrich-hammers-nbc-news-curry-media-over-cain-obsession/#IDComment218278469</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Gingrich Hammers NBC News' Curry, Media Over Cain Obsession</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/gingrich-hammers-nbc-news-curry-media-over-cain-obsession/#IDComment218275668</link>
<description>There&amp;#039;s a huge difference between failing to live up to a moral code and never having one in the first place. You morons are too stupid to understand this simple concept. So convinced of your own superiority, you&amp;#039;ve allowed that unearned arrogance to blind you to what conservative principles really are. Either that or you&amp;#039;re just malicious and you don&amp;#039;t care. I&amp;#039;ll let you decide which it is.  Traditional marriage getting in the way? Desecrate it by inventing the nonsense of &amp;quot;gay marriage.&amp;quot; Family values putting a damper on the party lifestyle? Label it &amp;#039;binary&amp;#039; and old fashioned. Religious teachings not letting you fornicate? Ridicule it and label all priests as pedophiles. Work dragging you down? Protest &amp;#039;the rich&amp;#039; and demand free crap. Don&amp;#039;t like the police because they represent authority? Defecate on the cars.  See the pattern? The left wing has absolutely no grounds for ever questioning anyone&amp;#039;s moral compass. You have zero credibility. Loser. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Nov 2011 19:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/gingrich-hammers-nbc-news-curry-media-over-cain-obsession/#IDComment218275668</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Heroic Small Businesswoman Amilya: Fix The Tax Code</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/heroic-small-businesswoman-amilya-fix-the-tax-code/#IDComment217348572</link>
<description>Keep crying about it, moron. I&amp;#039;m sure you&amp;#039;ve swayed someone to join your side.... </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 5 Nov 2011 17:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/heroic-small-businesswoman-amilya-fix-the-tax-code/#IDComment217348572</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Fox News'  3 AM 'Red Eye' Ratings Beat Scarborough, Piers Morgan, John King, Chris Matthews...</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/11/01/gutfelds-3-am-red-eye-ratings-beat-scarborough-piers-morgan-john-king-chris-matthews/#IDComment216558183</link>
<description>Your entire vocabulary consists of nothing but bad stereotypes, insinuations and general idiocy. When confronted with any argument contrary to your programming, your only recourse is to insult then quickly change the subject or try to accuse others of racism in an idiotic attempt to stifle the debate.  You are pathetic. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Nov 2011 00:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/11/01/gutfelds-3-am-red-eye-ratings-beat-scarborough-piers-morgan-john-king-chris-matthews/#IDComment216558183</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Fox News'  3 AM 'Red Eye' Ratings Beat Scarborough, Piers Morgan, John King, Chris Matthews...</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/11/01/gutfelds-3-am-red-eye-ratings-beat-scarborough-piers-morgan-john-king-chris-matthews/#IDComment216558103</link>
<description>And what did you add to the conversation with an insult of a picture, idiot? The fact that you didn&amp;#039;t see the absolute hypocrisy in your comment tears away any credibility you might have had to question someone else&amp;#039;s intelligence. If you had the intellectual aptitude to actually make a coherent argument, other than a vague projection of your own failings, you might be able to handle carrying this further. Instead, you won&amp;#039;t. You haven&amp;#039;t offered a single poignant argument in the whole of your existence and I don&amp;#039;t foresee that changing in your lifetime. Even your reply offers nothing but more projection and proof you categorize blacks as &amp;quot;our blacks&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;your blacks.&amp;quot; Your ridiculously small mind can&amp;#039;t even comprehend how hysterical that is, so why should I now accept more off-target criticism from a shallow, worthless troll?  And of course you know nothing of my education or social standing, but likw a good Little Eichmann, you&amp;#039;ll press on because that&amp;#039;s what you&amp;#039;re trained to do. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Nov 2011 00:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/11/01/gutfelds-3-am-red-eye-ratings-beat-scarborough-piers-morgan-john-king-chris-matthews/#IDComment216558103</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Fox News'  3 AM 'Red Eye' Ratings Beat Scarborough, Piers Morgan, John King, Chris Matthews...</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/11/01/gutfelds-3-am-red-eye-ratings-beat-scarborough-piers-morgan-john-king-chris-matthews/#IDComment215682705</link>
<description>Was that the best criticism you could come uo with? Insulting his avatar? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 07:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/11/01/gutfelds-3-am-red-eye-ratings-beat-scarborough-piers-morgan-john-king-chris-matthews/#IDComment215682705</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Fox News'  3 AM 'Red Eye' Ratings Beat Scarborough, Piers Morgan, John King, Chris Matthews...</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/11/01/gutfelds-3-am-red-eye-ratings-beat-scarborough-piers-morgan-john-king-chris-matthews/#IDComment215682345</link>
<description>Avoiding the subject of the question is the same for liberals. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 07:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/11/01/gutfelds-3-am-red-eye-ratings-beat-scarborough-piers-morgan-john-king-chris-matthews/#IDComment215682345</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Maher Booed For Marcus Bachmann Gay Joke</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/maher-booed-for-marcus-bachmann-gay-joke/#IDComment214680708</link>
<description>Your dad. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 07:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/maher-booed-for-marcus-bachmann-gay-joke/#IDComment214680708</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>
