"Hey, CPAC. Let's face it,
Your conference is racist."

"Face it" and "racist" do not rhyme. If you content is vapid, at least make the form good.

Why is Breitbart increasing traffic to SNL clips? Let the show die already. It's worthless.

If you're so against mandates via healthcare, Ann, why did you write a column "Three Cheers for Romneycare!"?

Obamacare helped spark the Tea Party revolt that swept the House and brought Republicans back to life (after a major defeat in 2008).

And now the Republican establishment pushes the author of Romneycare, Obamacare's prototype.

Never underestimate the Republicans' ability to (a) screw things up and (b) sell out conservatism.

He should have her working on that lawn. A travesty!

(Though he at least aerated it 7 times now.)

Shame on this Breitbart site for using a headline tactic worthy of the MSM.

Watch the video. Santorum did not say, as the headline states, "Obama Putting America On ‘Path’ Of Executing Religious People".

Yes, he uses the word "path" and then goes on to talk about the French revolution and the (divine) origin of human rights.

This headline is meant to make Santorum sound like he's a paranoid, fringe candidate, like he's saying executions are in Americans' future.

He's making a clear, logical point -- i.e. he's not "fear-mongering" -- when he simply says that if you look to government to give you everything (including rights), they can take them away. And, if you look to history, you'll see the government DOES do this.

India is in Asia. So I suppose O'Donnell reamed Biden for his (multiple) insulting comments of Indians, right? Remember when Biden even did an "Indian accent"?

I'd rather see Newt drop out so Santorum can go one-on-one against Romney.

We all appreciate Newt's forceful speech and quick wit in some of the debates. My ideal candidate would have that but without Newt's obvious liabilities. Of course, we don't have the option to mix-and-match. So I've decided for Santorum.

Santorum has a good plan for bringing manufacturing back to this country. He's been consistently opposed the individual mandate. He's consistently pro-life. He doesn't fly off the handle or make an outrageous spectacle of himself. He doesn't have the huge amounts of baggage in his personal life. He didn't badmouth Reagan Revolution or the Contract with America. He didn't fall for cap-and-trade.

In short, he compares favorably to Mitt and Newt. And he seems like the adult in the room.

I say conservatives -- CONSERVATIVES, not Republicans -- need to start beating the drum for Santorum.

And we should vote for him in the primary, despite the polling and media, if for no other reason than it'd give him more power/sway at the convention and in the party.

See Michelle Malkin's endorsement of Santorum here:
http://michellemalkin.com/2012/01/30/for-santorum...

unbiased1776 is exactly right.

And if you want to DO something about it, check out the organizations listed on my profile page. They're a good place to start.

To Piers Morgan:

If you had a baby helpless before you, would you jab metal instruments or pour chemicals into it to stop its heartbeat? Why or why not?

See, there is a human cost and an emotional appeal to be made the other way.

And it's much more real and prevalent than the hypothetical scenario you described.

Edited to add: Man, Santorum's answer was thoughtful, reasoned, and compassionate! Great job!