yep, it's so crazy for the government to abide by the U.S. Constitution and free markets. So crazy....
Paul is running on the same foreign policy as George Bush did during the 2000 election. Also, his foreign policy is in line the U.S. Constitution.
Why would I settle for a candidate that is only saying what we want to hear? I'm going to support and vote for the only candidate that had Tea Party/Conservative values, before it was the cool thing to do.
If only the Republicans had a candidate that they know would veto any budget that's not balanced. Not because that politician says so, but because you could look back at the voting record of the politician and see a consistent line of voting NO to tax increases, budgets that spend too much, or any type of legislation that goes against the U.S. Constitution.
I don't think that you proved anything, other than you like to make assumptions about things. Still haven't heard how many radical muslims have attacked America or Americans before the 1950s. I won't respond to any more rants until you answer that question.
Are you suggesting that we send more people to the middle east so they won't be murdered in our cities? That's your plan? Now you're not concerned about the evil Muslims that supposedly attack us because of our freedoms? You know what's an unacceptable response? basically anything that you type out.
I'm not sure there's an exact number, but I would say not many. He wants to save American lives by bringing back the troops that are stationed around the world, and especially those that are in war zones. I suppose it's time for you to continue dodging questions.
Don't worry, I know why you don't want to answer the real question.
I didn't change the criteria, I only had to explain further what I was asking, since you had a tough time following the conversation. You must be a lawyer or politician, with how you think you win arguments by nit picking. But thank you for answering my question, finally.
Don't worry, I know why you don't want to answer the question.