<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Texoma's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.intensedebate.com/users/455666</link>
		<description>Comments by Texoma</description>
<item>
<title>http://912wolverines.com/ : growl</title>
<link>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment291005074</link>
<description>Who was her doctor? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment291005074</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://912wolverines.com/ : growl</title>
<link>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment290233317</link>
<description>Will these votes be counted but not factored in, or not counted at all? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment290233317</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://912wolverines.com/ : growl</title>
<link>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment286750532</link>
<description>Would you vote for Romney if he were to select Paul to be his running mate? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2012 04:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment286750532</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://912wolverines.com/ : growl</title>
<link>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment286517262</link>
<description>And with Independents included in the poll, it is Romney 28%, Paul 22% and Gingrich and Santorum 16% each.    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ipsos-na.com/download/pr.aspx?id=11363&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.ipsos-na.com/download/pr.aspx?id=11363&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Feb 2012 21:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment286517262</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://912wolverines.com/ : growl</title>
<link>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment286510024</link>
<description>RON PAUL IN SECOND PLACE IN NATIONAL POLL    &lt;a href=&quot;http://reason.com/blog/2012/02/07/ron-paul-second-in-national-poll&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://reason.com/blog/2012/02/07/ron-paul-second...&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Feb 2012 21:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment286510024</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://912wolverines.com/ : growl</title>
<link>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment285876252</link>
<description>About 43,000 Republicans voted in the Nevada 2008 caucus.  This year that number went down about 25% to some 33,000 voters.      In 2008 Mitt Romney got 22,390 votes.  This year he got 16,486 votes.      In 2008 Ron Paul got 5862 votes.  This year he got 6175.      So, despite a reduction of about about 10,000 votes in Nevada, Ron Paul increased his number of voters.  Romney down, Paul up. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Feb 2012 03:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment285876252</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://912wolverines.com/ : growl</title>
<link>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment285869985</link>
<description>The RCP average of polls show the following leads of Obama over the GOP candidates:  Romney -4.0% Paul -6.2% Santorum -8.6% Gingrich -11.2% </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Feb 2012 03:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment285869985</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://912wolverines.com/ : growl</title>
<link>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment285061139</link>
<description>RCP reports closer to 43,000 votes cast in Nevada in 2008 for the GOP nomination.   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/republican_vote_count.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/pres...&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Feb 2012 04:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment285061139</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://912wolverines.com/ : growl</title>
<link>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment285058708</link>
<description>As of 11:30pm EST Sunday, it appears that there are thousands of votes still to be counted, and maybe as many as 15,000 more.  There were about 43,000 votes cast in the 2008 Nevada GOP content, and there are about 30,000 votes counted so far in yesterday&amp;#039;s caucus.  With so many votes still to be counted (or recounted), it appears entirely possible for Ron Paul to overtake Gingrich for 2nd place, given that he is about 900 votes behind. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Feb 2012 04:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment285058708</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://912wolverines.com/ : growl</title>
<link>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment282530693</link>
<description>Let&amp;#039;s hope he refrains from saying or doing anything that can be deemed &amp;quot;belligerent&amp;quot;, which is very hard to do these days. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 05:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment282530693</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://912wolverines.com/ : growl</title>
<link>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment282524940</link>
<description>Reminds me of those little crawling robots from the movie Minority Report. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 05:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment282524940</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://912wolverines.com/ : growl</title>
<link>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment280414520</link>
<description>Four caucus states in a row:  Nevada and Maine (Feb 4) and Colorado and Minnesota (Feb 7).  These are all states where enthusiastic support, such as Ron Paul has, will make a big difference. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Feb 2012 03:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment280414520</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://912wolverines.com/ : growl</title>
<link>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment280410138</link>
<description>Ron Paul&amp;#039;s message is consistent, and I consider him the most conservative of the four candidates in the race. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Feb 2012 03:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment280410138</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://912wolverines.com/ : growl</title>
<link>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment280357594</link>
<description>His unconstitutional behavior started when he took the oath of office, as he was not and is not eligible to be President. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Feb 2012 02:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment280357594</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://912wolverines.com/ : growl</title>
<link>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment279516326</link>
<description>I find it odd that in 2008, McCain won because Romney and Huckabee supposedly split the conservative vote.  Now, Romney is winning because Gingrich and Santorum are supposedly splitting the conservative vote? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment279516326</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://912wolverines.com/ : growl</title>
<link>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment278279655</link>
<description>FOUR NEW STATES JOIN GEORGIA IN CHALLENGING OBAMA&amp;rsquo;S ELIGIBILITY      The latest state is &amp;hellip; Illinois.  Hmmm ...      &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/www.sodahead.com\/united-states\/four-new-states-join-georgia-in-challenging-obamas-eligibility-for-the-ballot-and-one-of-them-is\/question-2422417\/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/four-new-st...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 04:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment278279655</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://912wolverines.com/ : growl</title>
<link>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment277479842</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Going rogue&amp;quot; would mean supporting Ron Paul. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 06:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment277479842</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://912wolverines.com/ : growl</title>
<link>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment276773486</link>
<description>And before 2003, the last time a Congressman or Senator proposed changing the definition of natural born citizen was in the 1970s.  How very fascinating. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 10:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment276773486</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://912wolverines.com/ : growl</title>
<link>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment276554492</link>
<description>It was not the doing of this judge.  This Georgia court lacked the authority to compel Hawaii to produce documents. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 05:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment276554492</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://912wolverines.com/ : growl</title>
<link>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment276551820</link>
<description>Thanks Dot.  Here is that same list of 8 bills juxtaposed with important dates in Obama&amp;#039;s rise to the national scene.  Jan 2003 &amp;ndash; Obama enters race for Illinois US Senate seat 1)  June 2003 Rep. Snyder (D-AR)HJR 59 - naturalized for 20 years 2)  Sept 2003 Rep. Conyers (D-MI) HJR 67 - naturalized for 35 years 3)  Feb 2004 Sen. Nickles (R-OK)SB 2128 - 14th amendment citizen July 2004 &amp;ndash; Obama speaks at Dem. National Convention 4)  Sept 2004 Rep. Rohrabacher (R-CA) HJR 104 - naturalized for 20 years 5)  Jan 2005 Rep. Conyers (D-MI) HJR 2 - naturalized for 20 years 6)  Feb 2005 Rep. Rohrabacher (R-OK) HJR 15 - naturalized for 20 years 7)  April 2005 Rep. Snyder (D-AR) HJR 42 - naturalized for 35 years 8)  Feb 2008 Sen. McCaskill (D-MO) SB 2678 - foreign-born children of US military </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 05:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://912wolverines.com/code/#IDComment276551820</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>
