You seem to implicate anger and jealousy gathered cumulatively from all of your comments here and you are now attempting to attack me personally.

Should you have any mature feedback or concerns, I will be inclined to reply. Contrarily, I will disregard.

May I ask, Ann, what does that have to do with anything?

Edit: Ah, I see. you perceive this is a third party viewer collecting data illegally. "it appears that some of those third party viewers also contain functionality that is being used to copy content without the right to do so, facilitate griefing, enable phishing, collect user data without clear disclosure of such practices".

Wrong.

• This isn't a viewer.
• Data is not collected via Second Life; not directly, as I have mentioned numerous times before, and I am perfecting it. I clearly stated in the notes, "With further research, it’s believed plausible to ban users via IP address. Method will be undisclosed."

The chances of a user obtaining another user's IP address which is banned within the system that plays Second Life in the same ISP, and in the same location (as hostnames are often unique to city initiails :p), are astronomical. If given the circumstance, however, that those odds miraculously do occur, IP bans can be lifted. (Remember, initially, it's optional and must be specified if the banning administrator intends to ban via IP.)

Please read the following posts below this.

It has nothing to do with the region, however, being locally present to the bot, it is likely. To preserve the security of the method, I am no longer commenting on that topic. Last thing we need is a slew of griefers gathering everyone's IP.

Thank you for your kind response.

There's no form of "getting into viewers". It's simply incoming data logged and analyzed. I would tell you more, however, it's very sensitive data. Just know that it's not directly via Second Life and it is not against the terms of service.

Even then, the administrators of this blog has your IP address. There's no harm that can be done with your IP address other than restricting it access, which is exactly what my system does to users that are rightfully banned from the regions owned by the users who utilize the system. Since it is not via Second Life directly, their Terms of Service is not taken into consideration.

As far as the security of Content Protection, the two months I have been innovating the system, has been primarily fail-safes and tight security. More specifically, which is why I located to a dedicated virtual private server, which has no linkage to any other hosts (as average webhosts do). Provided that security, it is more costly.