<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>SurgeUSAorg's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.intensedebate.com/users/312667</link>
		<description>Comments by SurgeUSAorg</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Tea party: Warming or resigned to Mitt Romney</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SO5J3G0&show_article=1#IDComment285709619</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s not over yet, despite efforts by the Romney crowd to declare their own inevitability. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Feb 2012 23:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SO5J3G0&show_article=1#IDComment285709619</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Gingrich bemoans Romney's Florida "carpet-bombing"</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SIMQ9G0&show_article=1#IDComment277854704</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Despite Romney&amp;#039;s effort to turn positive&amp;quot; - are you kidding?  What evidence is there to back up this assertion?  Journalism is dead, or the AP editor is clearly bised.. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SIMQ9G0&show_article=1#IDComment277854704</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Gingrich under fire from conservative media</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SH704G2&show_article=1#IDComment275920344</link>
<description>With friends like these, who needs enemies?  As with the liberal media, voters need to be alert to the agenda behind other reporters, and not believe everything they read, even from usually reliable sources. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SH704G2&show_article=1#IDComment275920344</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Romney looking to clinch GOP nomination in Florida</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SAVC382&show_article=1#IDComment267142087</link>
<description>Romney is trying to maintain the illusion of inevitability.  Note that his campaign just challenged the ballot access petitions of Rick Santorum in Illinois last Friday to try to prevent Illinois voters from having a choice in the March 20 primary, because he can&amp;#039;t take the chance that conservatives will vote for somebody else, especially downstate rather than in the more liberal Chicago area.  They challenged delegate slates in 10 of 14 districts where Santorum&amp;#039;s campaign filed candidates (out of 18 districts).  By contrast, Newt is on the ballot with full slates in all 18 districts.  Rick Perry didn&amp;#039;t file slates, so the election in Illinois is just Romney, Gingrich, and Paul with the exception of a few districts.  Don&amp;#039;t buy the myth of his inevitability.  Since when do we call elections after 1% of the vote in a biased district (NH)? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SAVC382&show_article=1#IDComment267142087</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama to accept nomination at Charlotte stadium</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SASBK81&show_article=1#IDComment267028728</link>
<description>Pray for rain on Sept 6.  Not something harmful to the good folks of Charlotte, like a hurricane.  A nice, severe thunderstorm at the right time should do nicely to spoil the party and disrupt the planned media circus. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SASBK81&show_article=1#IDComment267028728</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Rivals say split SC conservative vote aids Romney</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9S9LV381&show_article=1#IDComment265341085</link>
<description>Huntsman didn&amp;#039;t even file to get on the ballot in VA (Mar 6) or IL (Mar 20).  How is he a credible candidate at this point?  He spent a bundle in NH trying to appear relevant, and failed.  Meanwhile, Rick Perry failed to come up with delegates for the ballot in IL, too.  Santorum got some Cain supporters to help him at the last minute, but they failed to get enough signatures in 14 of 18 districts, and Romney&amp;#039;s delegates challenged to keep them off the ballot rather than take any chances of losing.  So much for the myth that his victory is inevitable.  If that were true, there was no need to challenge Santorum.  Ron Paul&amp;#039;s supporters screwed up his petition, so he&amp;#039;ll probably be off the IL ballot too.  It is going to be a race between Romney and Newt in Illinois as the last primary before all the &amp;quot;winner takes all&amp;quot; primaries start in April.  Romney may still be trying to persuade the media that his nomination is inevitable, but he only has about 12 of the 1144 delegates he needs so far.  Since when do we call elections with only 1% of the votes in from a biased district? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 23:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9S9LV381&show_article=1#IDComment265341085</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : GOP candidates fail to get on some primary ballots</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9S7UUOG0&show_article=1#IDComment263096335</link>
<description>Ron Paul actually is vulnerable to challenge in Illinois if anybody cares to do so.  His supporters filed a petition with the wrong address on it.  They gave the campaign HQ address in Springfield VA.  The law requires the registered voting address of the candidate.  Rick Perry&amp;#039;s team made the same mistake.  Santorum only filed in 14 of 18 districts, and 10 of those were without enough signatures if challenged.  Only the Romney and Gingrich campaigns got it right - with 54 delegates in play on March 20. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9S7UUOG0&show_article=1#IDComment263096335</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Romney defends business record in face of attacks</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9S54NNO0&show_article=1#IDComment259112506</link>
<description>He should be worried now about voters giving him the pink slip. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jan 2012 03:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9S54NNO0&show_article=1#IDComment259112506</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Iran reported to enrich uranium at underground lab</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9S53E600&show_article=1#IDComment259045478</link>
<description>Really?  How hard would it be to make a nuclear facility inaccessible for generations to come, even if it is still buried there?  Remember Chernobyl?  Fukushima?  This is just more meaningless rhetoric out of Iran for domestic consumption. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jan 2012 01:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9S53E600&show_article=1#IDComment259045478</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Romney defends business record in face of attacks</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9S53E700&show_article=1#IDComment259038329</link>
<description>He did get the pink slip - from voters.  Time to do it again.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newt.org/notromney&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.newt.org/notromney&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jan 2012 00:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9S53E700&show_article=1#IDComment259038329</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Romney says he'd work with Democrats</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9S4QSI00&show_article=1#IDComment259036163</link>
<description>Yes, we know he can work with Democrats. The question is whether he will stand up for Republican policies, or just perceive his role as dealmaker in chief, and settle for whatever he can get. We don&amp;#039;t need a &amp;quot;go along to get along&amp;quot; leader selling us out.  Not Romney!  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newt.org/notromney&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.newt.org/notromney&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jan 2012 00:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9S4QSI00&show_article=1#IDComment259036163</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : AP source: Admin. plans change in immigration rule</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9S3EG500&show_article=1#IDComment256826534</link>
<description>When they don&amp;#039;t like a law, they just selectively choose to ignore or not enforce it.  Since when did the Executive branch have the unilateral authority to disregard laws properly passed by Congress, as though enforcement was discretionary?  This undermines the rule of law and is a dangerous precedent.  How would the Democrats like it if a Republican administration simply decided to stop all enforcement of labor laws which business leaders dislike? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jan 2012 14:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9S3EG500&show_article=1#IDComment256826534</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Iowa defeat leaves Perry in unfamiliar role: loser</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9S3B58O0&show_article=1#IDComment256819444</link>
<description>Time to find a way to save face for the future and bow out gracefully.  A continued series of defeats will limit his future potential.  Get back to work for Texas and help make a difference in other ways, such as by helping to unite conservatives.  Don&amp;#039;t keep wasting millions attacking fellow Republicans. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jan 2012 14:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9S3B58O0&show_article=1#IDComment256819444</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Santorum faces organization, money hurdles</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9S2G0F80&show_article=1#IDComment255968023</link>
<description>As Karl Rove just pointed out this morning on Fox News, there are filing deadlines over the next week which the Santorum campaign seems very likely to miss, raising serious doubts about their ability to win enough delegates to be a contender.  They have been scrambling with the help of some former Herman Cain supporters to find potential delegates and gather petition signatures in Illinois, where the filing deadline is Friday Jan 6.  They just started work on this Dec 23.  By contrast, the Romney, Paul, and Gingrich campaigns have been working on this for months and have full slates and plenty of signatures in all 18 districts already.  Frankly, rather than a serious campaign, this looks more like an effort by some of the party leaders who are behind Romney to split to conservative opposition vote so that he can win with just 25%. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jan 2012 14:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9S2G0F80&show_article=1#IDComment255968023</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : McCain says GOP should settle quickly on Romney</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9S2PE283&show_article=1#IDComment255960214</link>
<description>This is the &amp;quot;go along to get along&amp;quot; mentality which got us Obama.  The only good thing about this McCain endorsement is that it may actually hurt Romney almost everywhere except New Hampshire. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jan 2012 14:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9S2PE283&show_article=1#IDComment255960214</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama campaign, Dems set $60M fundraising goal</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9RQDBH00&show_article=1#IDComment245738639</link>
<description>Why does the media keep repeating the hype about raising $1 billion when the Obama campaign isn&amp;#039;t remotely close to that original goal?  They have spent the last year chasing after all of their established donors, and are at perhaps $200 million.  Rather than the historic amount of money that they claimed they would be able to raise, that pace is closer to Kerry, Gore, Bush, or McCain.  Instead, they&amp;#039;re having to resort to online lottery-style auctions of dinners with the Obamas to raise cash.  What next?  Will he start accepting food stamps to exploit those who rely on government?   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9RQDBH00&show_article=1#IDComment245738639</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Occupy hecklers drown out Bachmann at Iowa diner</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9RPT4C82&show_article=1#IDComment245461105</link>
<description>Maybe we need to match the &amp;quot;mic check&amp;quot; practice with &amp;quot;pepper spray check&amp;quot;.  Make it standard practice to treat such hecklers that way until they get the message that this is not free speech, and is not protected.  When they start to trample on the rights of others by deliberately creating a public disturbance, there should be no tolerance.  If they want to have a civil debate, that&amp;#039;s fine.  It they want to try to intimidate free speech by shouting down anyone with whom they disagree, then they deserve to be arrested for disorderly conduct.  These are the same sorts of radical agitators as disrupted the Democratic convention in 1968.  Not even Mayor Daley would tolerate them.  He may have gotten bad publicity out of the incidents, which is what the radicals wanted, but at some point we have to stand up to these thugs or there will be no end to their abuses.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 14:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9RPT4C82&show_article=1#IDComment245461105</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : US House to vote on Churchill statue for capitol</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.36250fd7ea7d7c41d8cfe510d0060488.301&amp;show_article=1#IDComment243335563</link>
<description>Lafayette Park might be a good location. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.36250fd7ea7d7c41d8cfe510d0060488.301&amp;show_article=1#IDComment243335563</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Tea partyers not keen about GOP presidential field</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9RN7QH00&show_article=1#IDComment241240024</link>
<description>The MSM still doesn&amp;#039;t get it.  These Tea Party &amp;quot;leaders&amp;quot; don&amp;#039;t speak for the movement.   They speak for themselves.  The movement consists of motivated, well-informed individuals who take responsibility for their own choices, and will choose which campaigns to actively support or not.  They are not drones waiting for &amp;quot;leaders&amp;quot; to tell them what to think, what to do, or for whom to vote.  They think for themselves, and organize locally from the bottom-up, rather than according to top-down instructions.  It is a network of many leaders, rather than many followers. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9RN7QH00&show_article=1#IDComment241240024</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Tea partyers not keen about GOP presidential field</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9RN4DCG0&show_article=1#IDComment241177574</link>
<description>Kremer, JB Martin, and others don&amp;#039;t speak for Tea Party folks. They speak for themselves. This is a movement of informed individuals who will take responsibility for making their own choices and working for the campaigns of their choice. It is not a collection of drones waiting for their leaders to tell them what to do.  The MSM still doesn&amp;#039;t get it. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 23:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9RN4DCG0&show_article=1#IDComment241177574</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>
