We've been through a lot together, Tom. ;) Even though your Party has treated the British people with the utmost of disrespect, I will miss your blog.

Okay, you didn't like that last comment for some reason. Please allow me this much...

I just believe the former advisors whose evidence can be substantiated.

Do you agree with Andrew Neather (he just stated the obvious, after all) and do you regret how Labour cynically used immigration for political gain?

I hope to live to see the real culprits being brought to justice and not just a scapegoat.

Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a "truly multicultural" country, a former Government adviser has revealed.

Taren Capel - of course you have beliefs. You believe it is a "Godless world" - and please don't invoke Russell's Teapot, which is nonsensical.

"Atheism" is a minority condition, so you have decided, for whatever reason, to disregard your normal human emotions.

You presumably believe there is no afterlife. Being "content" with godlessness is simply you living in ignorant bliss. It won't last long.

Economic Left/Right: -2.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.46

You're even to the right of me, Tom ;)

Johnny, it is especially irritating when our own heritage is being undermined, nay trashed. I grew up to feel positive about Britain as I'm sure you did, but now we're meant to feel guilty and ashamed about our history, institutions, traditions, morals and our alleged contribution to climate change.

Taren Capel,

Churches and other charities play a massively important role in attending to the needs of others. The government doesn't do everything! Sometimes people need charities because of what the government has done!

As a "staunch atheist", you should realise that yours is a belief system too and becoming more and more a religion thanks to other staunch and "proud" "atheists". Unfortunately, it is a religion built on sand.

(Note to self: an uppercase "B" and closing bracket make a smiley with shades. I knew that already - someone did it on my blog and I chortled.)

Sure, it was the CPs that messed things up and the strange belief that these people were "entitled" to children.

Anyway, Tom, your replies just won't do, because the fact of the matter is that good adoption agencies are closing down because they won't play along with New Labour's global secular/humanist-inspired "morality".

Some of us would literally rather die than go along with it.

Actually, that's one thing New Labour has achieved - you've made accepting death easier!

You are turning this around, Tom. Were that the case with every agency, why the need for the government to get all authoritarian about it? Why not just let them be? Was it just to show them who's boss? Just another demonstration of religious intolerance? Just to stir up more resentment in society as part of your divide and rule politics?

A) Why the fuss and bother from the government if the agencies were doing what you wanted them to do anyway, and

B) Why the fuss and bother from the agencies if your laws simply obliged them to do what they were already doing?

It's the first I've heard of it, Tom. The fact that some agencies have closed over this maybe tells a different story?

Regardless, the legislation was put in place out of spite when there are other 'charities' willing to supply children to homosexual pairings.

Maybe you could explain why you think everyone must adhere to New Labour's ethical 'standards' especially after Ed Miliband says New Labour is no more.