Steelers43
59p14 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
2 weeks ago @ Defense Tech - Adios Global Hawk, U-2... · 0 replies · +4 points
The RQ-4 is expendable because you don't need an unmanned aircraft to fly the kind of missions it supports, lingering over non-hostile airspace, the U2 does those just fine and the U2 support structure is already in place and efficient.
Also, it seems that blimps can linger for much longer periods than the RQ-4 and at a much lower cost.
29 weeks ago @ Defense Tech - What's DEVGRU Building... · 1 reply · 0 points
31 weeks ago @ Kit Up! - IMINT: Tricked out Chi... · 5 replies · +16 points
97 weeks ago @ Defense Tech - How I Learned to Stop ... · 2 replies · +1 points
98 weeks ago @ Defense Tech - NORK Mine May Have Sun... · 0 replies · +1 points
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,879070,00.html
In regards to a NORK sub firing a torpedo, that scenario just seems so unlikely to me. It would seem to make more sense for that to happen if NORK was trying to provoke a prolonged conflict, which it doesn't seem they are in a position to do right now. Mines can be planted by any sort of hard to detect underwater vehicle which-- would seem to be the preferred method if someone wanted to inflict damage but, didn't want to risk getting caught red-handed.
98 weeks ago @ Defense Tech - All Raucous On Cyber W... · 3 replies · +1 points
98 weeks ago @ Defense Tech - Russian Blackjack Bomb... · 3 replies · 0 points
98 weeks ago @ Defense Tech - Cyber Hackers Target UK · 0 replies · +2 points
100 weeks ago @ Defense Tech - F-16 Sale to Taiwan, W... · 0 replies · +1 points
100 weeks ago @ Defense Tech - South of the Border Ma... · 2 replies · +2 points
Opus