<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Saila's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.intensedebate.com/users/557957</link>
		<description>Comments by Saila</description>
<item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Dems Tell Obama to Back Off Israel Criticism </title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/02/dems-tell-obama-to-back-off-israel-criticism/#IDComment23192071</link>
<description>Why does a comment have to be approved by site admins? One can go and post a comment on &amp;quot;Forward&amp;quot; (a Jewish publication), and the comment appears immediately, even though the comment may not be Israel-friendly.  On second thought I think it&amp;#039;s a good idea that comments be approved/disapproved by site admins. By their rejecting or approving a comment the site would identify in whose pocket they are.  Saila </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/02/dems-tell-obama-to-back-off-israel-criticism/#IDComment23192071</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Dems Tell Obama to Back Off Israel Criticism </title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/02/dems-tell-obama-to-back-off-israel-criticism/#IDComment23191637</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m not surprised at Dems. They get elected by contribution paid by AIPAC and various other Jewish lobbies, and now they are paying back what they were paid for: Put the interest of a foreign country ahead of those of the U.S. It&amp;#039;s a shame. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/02/dems-tell-obama-to-back-off-israel-criticism/#IDComment23191637</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>
