Halloween from 1978. Perfect score. Perfect pacing and characters. Set the bar for all other slashers after it.

The 1978 Halloween. It set the stage for all of the rest of the slashers, had the most iconic score/theme music and was set in a world we all knew and that made it seem so much more real than any other slashed and consequentially scarier, to me at least.

You just cheated and copied this reply from your blog!

It was a slight dip, not downhill. It was better with Joel. Their deliveries were different, but I think its a matter of taste with who was better. The thing Joel had was that Mike was his head writer, so they had the comedic talent of both of them, while Mike didn't have the Joel genius. The Mike era had some of my favorite episodes. "The FInal Sacrifice", "The Wild Wild World of Batwoman" and "Red Zone Cuba" are all brilliant.

MST3K is the greatest underrated TV show of all time.

One of the South Park guys is.

The rankings were totally objective. I did not choose them. Cartman really lost a lot of points for not being stupid and not having a funny haircut. Otherwise it would have been a landslide.

That comes across as very rude.

You do realize this was an article on "Which Disney Princess Do You Want to Boink" and not the Watergate scandal, right? So part of being an unpaid internet writer you have to take several things into account. Is the effort into an article worth the reward? The level of research done for the article was enough to make it the most read article on our site in well over a year. So, I'm inclined to believe my hypothesis was correct that the level of research I did for an article on boinking cartoon characters was the correct amount.

On to learning to take criticism. When putting things out to a large audience, there will be tons of comments on both sides of the aisle. A good portion of them will not try to offer any genuine criticism of what you wrote and try to make you feel bad. They are called trolls. So you either have to ignore all or selectively choose what you let sink it. Its hard to let the criticism in while filtering the trolls. Criticism is a thoughtful analysis of some error in your writing. Trolls just try to get a rise out of people with inflammatory statements littered with hyperbole. What you did is not criticism. Its trolling. Criticism will include some analysis like "Because you did X, it resulted in Y." Like "Because you did not watch Mulan, the article suffered because..." or "Because you didn't go see "The Princess and the Frog, your rankings are skewed because..." Trolling includes things like "you suck", lack of any substance in comments and a total lack of appreciation for capitalization of letters at the beginning of sentences. A non-troll would have stated in some manner or fashion how only seeing 15 of the 18 films or TV Shows listed above affected the facts or opinions in the article.

I hope that helps clear things up! Best of luck in becoming an educated and well-respected troll. I believe you'll need it.

You're worried about wasting time and you want me to go off and watch Mulan, Hunchback of Notre Dame and the Princess and the Frog?