He did an outstanding job as the body guard in "Stay Cool". You realize he can really act. Absolutely fantastic.
Ah. So free speach to a democrat party rube is the ability to threaten someone with violence.
I am always amazed by the liberal mind set. They can list all the bad things that ever happened because of America and say they aren't justified by the good and America is bad. They can list one or two things done by a communist regime and justify the death of millions based on them and talk about how we should emulate them.
I am pro choice. I don't want to make that decision for the woman. But one thing I have always found odd. I say it is her choice to kill the unborn child, and the "pro choice" crowd doesn't want to "say it" that way. I tell them I would sanction the murder of the unborn child, I just don't want to have any part of it and that includes paying for it. They tell me its not murder. They want to call it something else. So it is not enough that I would give them the right to do so, they want to rename the act so it is not as offensive. Turns out, although I am pro choice, I am unwilling to rename the act of murdering the unborn child to make them feel better about it. You can have the right to do it, but it is what it is and you have to own it. They don't want to be burdened with owning the act. They want absolution of some sort by renaming the act. That, I am unwilling to give.
Maybe if we had more gun control laws we wouldn't have had "fast and furious". Oh, wait. That was the point of "Fast and Furious". To get more gun control laws we had to violate the existing gun control laws. Maybe we should move into collecting all the guns without the laws to do so. Wait, we did that during the Katrina tragedy in New Orleans. This is getting confusing. Which laws do the DOJ enforce and which ones are the ignoring? It seems like it would be easier if we just went ahead and followed the laws as written and changed them with legislation signed by the senate, congress and the president if we don't.
Jeff Patterson "owed Americans an explanation". Fair enough. He was given a security clearance. He accessed and dispensed classified documents without the authority to do so. Doing so hurt the war effort and damaged the credibility of the state department during a time of war. He released the documents to have this affect. So he should be hung. Barring that, life in prison no chance of getting out other than a box after a very long time.
Explained. Any questions? I can explain it to you Mr. Patterson, but I can't understand it for you.
The cracker, southern democrat, the group that supported segregation doesn't like the black republican.
The reward for winning is opulance given by the "government" and becoming a spokes person for the government. So its like becoming a friend to the Obama administration and being given riches in return for your allegiance.
I am not for mandatory anything. As a matter of fact, I am adamently against forcing people to do anything. I have an HSA and I agree its a good thing. However, I am self employeed. Many employers give great health insurance because it is a perk that can be offered they can use as a tax break and the employee gets a valuable benefit tax free. However, many companies can't afford to give 100% health insurance. So being able to deduct the remainder from your taxes would be a huge benefit. All, without being mandantory.
As you can see, he has no problem sitting in front of you and looking you in the eye and lying to you. Of course the appointment of the judges and the appointment of his consumer protection racket loser have nothing to do with creating jobs but he links them together hoping you don't have a question like "what does appointing a judge have to do with creating jobs?" or what does appointing this judge have to do with economics at all?