To call his tenure a "watch" is a rude assault on actual watch standers.

His tenure protecting the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic is more accurately characterized as a "glance."

Why yes, of course they are!

That they are is patently obvious.

Nine out of ten studies on the subject conducted by the liberal arts faculties of colleges and universities across the globe confirm it.

So was it written, so shall it be true.

Objective methodology? We don' need no stinkin' objective methodology!

Marketing 101 - Read it. Learn it. Live it.

His glasses tell me all I need to know about him.

The Constitution ain't broke so don't try to fix it, Ruth!!

Planned Parenthood founder: Margaret Sanger

Advocate for eugenics: Margaret Sanger https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Sanger#Eug...

Advocate for eugenics: Woodrow Wilson

Advocate for eugenics after the movement lost traction in North America: Adolph Hitler

Natural law has evolved to ensure survival of species. Rational species, even those at the bottom of the "sentient" scale, do not kill their own (those that do are in the extreme minority).

The arrogance of people who believe they can alter the moral imperatives of natural law is galactic...and extremely dangerous.

The Catholic Church teaches that life begins at conception; Progressives believe that life begins where they say it does, at whatever point is most "convenient" for the species.

The Progressives' incredibly fluid moral scale exists on the precipice of a steep, slippery slope.

Consider the Oval Office Rug installed after he took power. It contains a quote mis-attributed to MLK, a flaw.

Consider the practice common among Muslim rug-weavers. More often than not the rugs they weave contain a flaw to demonstrate humility, to avoid affronting Allah with a deliberate flaw that states the weavers are not perfect; only Allah is perfect.

Coincidence?

Affronting infidels like Catholics with brazen assaults on their beliefs is also considered to be an act of much virtue by those particular votaries.

Coincidence?

Actions speak louder than words, methinks.

"Learning the craft of legislation...set a tone for practical politics...eliminate slash and burn politics...behooves those in power to try to find common ground...make sure our troops have the kind of equipment they're going to need..."

Did he spend any time in the Illinois Legislature learning the "craft of legislation?"

Has he "set a tone for practical politics" since coming to power?

Has he eliminated "slash and burn politics?"

Has he found "common ground" with anyone other than his hard left base?

Has he made sure that our troops "have the equipment they need" with his massive social spending that can only be funded by slashing the military budget?

I think the answer to those questions and so many others about this administration is a resounding "NO!"

This is just one of the first steps in the "Change" that will overtake this country to pay for this massive experiment in social engineering.

The real fees will be paid by our troops in years to come when they're forced to confront a well-armed and prepared enemy on the battlefield with substantially diminished combat capability.

Our national security apparatus and infrastructure are being dismantled to fund the giant hippie ashram that used to be the self-sufficient, strong, economically powerful United States of America.

Equipped with small payloads of concentrated toxins, poison gas, irritants, lethal single-celled organisms, or even concentrated explosives, thousands of them could render a combat unit in the field combat-ineffective.

This looks like a poor man's strike package.