Pop_Larkin
59p58 comments posted · 3 followers · following 0
95 weeks ago @ Simon Darby - The Great Debate? · 0 replies · +2 points
110 weeks ago @ Simon Darby - Seconds Out · 0 replies · +1 points
POP
110 weeks ago @ Simon Darby - Phantom Voters · 1 reply · +2 points
Onward & upwards in 2010 my friends, my hero's.
POP
111 weeks ago @ Simon Darby - BBC Radio 4 - The Worl... · 0 replies · +1 points
Isn't it rather ironic that the need to expose the "evil" of the BNP is a huge issue & would appear very news worthy, but apparently there is no need to expose the religion of peace who desperately try to slaughter innocent members of the public on mass with monotonous regularity. Perhaps it's my "moronic vileness vile right wing mindset" but I would say that people that repeatedly try to blow up, poison & massacre innocent people were the "evil" ones, yet the media, along with Kinnock, Cambell & Howard LibLabCon etc continuously try to portray a legitimate democratic legal political party that only tries to stand up for & preserve the heritage & values of their very own Country & has harmed NO ONE are the apparent evil monsters. How so?
POP
111 weeks ago @ The British National P... - Latest Terrorist Attem... · 0 replies · +1 points
Better to be classed as a "racist" than to be blown to kingdom come!
POP
111 weeks ago @ The British National P... - Latest Terrorist Attem... · 3 replies · +10 points
Please tell me someone, why I should fear for my life every time I fly because of people like these?
POP
111 weeks ago @ Simon Darby - Christmas Begins · 0 replies · +1 points
I hope that you, Nick & in fact everybody involved with the BNP have a very Merry Christmas & I sincerely hope we all have an extremely successful new year. Onwards & upwards my friends!
POP
113 weeks ago @ Simon Darby - Twitting · 0 replies · +3 points
POP
114 weeks ago @ Simon Darby - Serial Deniers? · 0 replies · +1 points
Off topic I know but I thought I should bring this to your attention if you haven't seen it already.
While listening to BBC radio Cornwall (online), there was a segment on a chat show that said that the "Optimum Population Trust" reported today (3rd December) that contraception should be made available to the whole world population to curb population growth. Fair enough, but I thought that contraception was already offered to Africans who wouldn't use it as it violated their religious believes. I could be wrong on this. However, the Optimum Population Trust (OPT) recommend that families in the West should restrict their procreation to two children per couple.
David Burton, environmentalist strategist for OPT said that while the Western persons "carbon footprint" was 10 tons per person, the African equivalent was 1/10 th at 1 ton. He also stated that the West had a responsibility to tackle the problem. He went on to state that Iran introduced sex & relationship education to cut its over population from 6 children to 2 on an average helped by their mullers.
So all I can gather from this is another leftist crank organization designed to put blame on Western nations for the over population of the planet. At worst they seem to be saying we should restrict our procreation to under replacement levels while 3rd world people can carry on regardless as it's all out fault anyway, therefore eventually breading ourselves out of existence. Sound familiar? I also figure that there has to be more than 10 times the population in the 3rd world compared to the West so therefore the 3rd world's unrestricted procreation overall has a larger "carbon footprint" that the West. Furthermore, Am I to assume that all immigrants from the 3rd world would adopt 10 times the carbon footprint when settled in their "host" Western nation. If so I can only assume that all effort will be maid by the OPT to immediately halt migration from all 3rd world nations to the Western world. Yeah right. Don't hold your breath!
Pop
116 weeks ago @ The British National P... - No More Fish? · 0 replies · +3 points
POP
Brainchild