The self righteous can now use the U.S postal service as a social network. It's a culture. One network isn't better then the other. It's what I've said for a while. Still, it is quite upsetting that twitter thinks an account from some Jihadist group is free expression, but are willing to muffle the expression of people in third world countries. From the start twitter didn't respect their own terms. They actually don't give a lot of energy towards justifying their arguments (yes I put them to the test... twitter thinks using twitterfeed is "architectural abuse")... but like you say... it's their network. right? so if that is the way it is... then perhaps we need to take the technology rights away from them. It would appear their innovation is getting in the way of the rights of others. Anti-Trust is the way to go.

that goes for the Mormons and what they believe. I've pointed out the curse on black folks in the Mormon church before. The Mormons were the beatnics of their day. They were abolitionists who were looking to explain why some of humanity were slaves and others were not. They developed a liberalism that they thought would allow them to better the darker skin people among them. As an outside of their church it is wrong for me to call them racist, because we fail to understand the context of why their "mythology" developed. When you are "liberal" you immediately send a message to others that you feel you are better then those whose lives are worse then yours is. The liberal progressives and their feminism today are going to look quite elitist to future generations. before you judge, you must understand context. The same can be said of other non religious movements like Marxists. It is wrong to judge hundreds of years of Socialists based on today's knowledge. We can find heroes from Christians, Marxists... and even Islam and still distance ourselves from their entire cannon.

Also I mentioned how some Jews take on the characteristics of the Christian faith. In my mind Yashoooooah was the liberal of his day. We call it a Conservative theology now, but the Conservatism developed out of an ideology that was meant to help Judaism deal with itself outside of it's own code. The Holy of Holy... even in the the day of Yashooooooah, was not in the temple. The Jews were making sacrifices to vapor and were already in paradox with their own laws. Yahshuah.... or his followers... depending on how you see it historically were dealing with real Jewish issues. When I see those Palestinian sympathizing Jews today.... accusing us of elitism... recycling the old hates that started with the Christians, there is a reason why. The Christian condemnation of Judaism and other versions of Jews is not much different then what Blumenthal and his left wing Jews are doing today. It is a huge mistake to open your arms up to liberal feminist martyr victim obsessed Jews today and think the Christians were any different.

You can't judge a religious text based on what is possible, you must accept the context of the religion to reasonably condemn it's ideology. there might be the most minute chance that the text may not be used caustically. Christianity claims to be an orthodox unchanging doctrine, but in reality there is obvious diversity. I'm not a Christian. I find it hard to swallow a faith that runs in contradiction to what G-d presented to Moses and then condemns those who fail to see what I can not see. I've also been stunted and hurt by the Christian community... and usually when I enter a sexual sphere. My son is a gentile and my relationship with his mother failed I believe because I was an outsider.... and I hold all the frustration that the JIDF has with Christians. To me Christianity is a Judaism that has been stunted by narrow minded irredesence. That said there are plenty of Jews who take on those same characteristics in their thinking, but at the same time I realize that it is not a violent faith and I wish you would stop harping on what I believe to be Christianity's flaws. It is our job as Jews to bring all people closer to G-d and I fail to see how pointing out that there are Christians in America that are hostile helps us bring the friendly Christians closer to G-d. Even if you were right on everything on a pure strategic level you fail when you constantly point out Christianities short comings. As a community we are adequately aware of history. I know all about Martin Luther King's Anti-Semitism. I know all about the Spanish Inquisition, and yet on a theoretical level there is a possibility that the Jewish Messiah will be born of Christian parents. We are in a Christian nation... that we are a part of... that we helped build for the better and the violent end game Christians espouse are not the acts of men, but rather a Supernatural state. It is pointless to harp on something that they are not active participants in.

are they really worse then these bitches? [youtube jyp-3ulZmQI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyp-3ulZmQI youtube]

the reason I'm publicly airing this is for principle. we are not the only Jews out there... other Jewish people deal all the time with trying to figure out who our enemies are. I have a guy on my profile right now (for example). Who a Jewish woman (who I like a lot) from Germany is saying is a Neo Nazi. I contacted the guy and he says that is libel from the New Israel Fund. who do we believe? I know the left libels people... and the main stream media libels people too. I've been libeled on the news before myself. so being able to discriminate and figure out who is trying to hurt us is important.

I even go out of my way on my blog to defend Anonymous here when it is obvious here that their art work has hostilities. why would I do that? someone must of told me something. that someone was you David

I would of spent a lot more time on Anonymous if I had known they were simply the way they obviously are. you don't take a stand, but you make those who know you accept your point of view. It was terribly obvious these guys hated Israel. Very obvious. I pointed out their art work to you... and you made it seem like these guys were diffuse and could not be responsible for each other.

you might not like me publicly pointing out your flaws, but I don't like the burden of your private opinions. I should of spent the last year attacking them. it would of been good for me and good for the Jews online that I hang with. now it turns out my initial hunch was correct... and that initial hunch was countered by your nebulous opinions.

obviously I don't speak for you. you point out that out continuously. I don't want clarification from you on these things because you cramping my style.

These guys should of been a major target... not Glenn Beck, not Christians.... not Newt Gingrich. not the EDL... and certainly not Pamela Geller...

um... David. I thought you said some of Anonymous were Zionists and that it was "complicated"... that is why I didn't attack them as much as I would of liked. you have got to stop listening to your left wing sources. They are trying to get Obama elected again.... and they know the Jews are the key to their chances. wake up... groups like Anonymous are not complicated. No more complicated then our mutual female friend who betrayed you. you don't have to praise Yaaaaaaaahshoooooaaaaaah, but you do have to know who your allies are.

don't let the creepy left frame the argument. The pope enables Palestine... that makes him at about on the same level as the "left"... in fact the Pope is economically socialist and a globalist (he wants a global financial oversight police). I'm sure in conversation you've abused terms... but Susan isn't too far off... though she isn't that far away from the Pope's worldview as she would like. Take Abortion, Condoms and the right to Sodomy out of the equation and you have the Pope and Susan at about the same place.