MvGuy
99p1,939 comments posted · 3 followers · following 0
1 hour ago @ Antiwar.com Original A... - A House of Sand and Fog · 0 replies · +2 points
Are you going for a record number of thumbs down...??? Come-on Michael..... You CAN and have in the past done better........ Far better.....
1 day ago @ News From Antiwar.com - Pakistan's Supreme Cou... · 0 replies · +2 points
2 days ago @ Antiwar.com Original A... - The 'Cairo 19' Got Wha... · 0 replies · +2 points
2 days ago @ News From Antiwar.com - US Still Can't Find Mi... · 0 replies · +2 points
2 days ago @ News From Antiwar.com - Congress Passes Bill t... · 0 replies · +1 points
CLUSTERFOOK More likely... && big bucks for the kids that find them and sell them on e-bay .....or to the N. Koreans
2 days ago @ News From Antiwar.com - NATO Air Strike Kills ... · 0 replies · +7 points
3 days ago @ News From Antiwar.com - House Hearings on Balo... · 0 replies · +2 points
3 days ago @ News From Antiwar.com - House Hearings on Balo... · 0 replies · +8 points
OOOOOOOO Yeah The NWO/Conoco/Neocon plan to OWN the Caspian TAP pipeline,corridor AND snatch... the Pakistan nuclear weapons...... Disarm the Islamic bomb...... VERY Neocon friendly.......
Good friggin luck....... The NWO crew aint doin so well against Afghanistan right now..... and what would happen if China took the gloves off and really started backing their Pakistani "friends" against NATO and their NWO pals...??? It would NOT be pretty....... Bad idea, get an honest job, stop stealing...!!
3 days ago @ Antiwar.com Original A... - Our Bloodstained Hands · 1 reply · +4 points
UUUMMM...UUUMMM.... ummabdulla ...!!! You would brlieve the BBC before PePe...??? When the British have been talking openly of war...war...war..... And it was Brazil and Turkey tried to werk out a deal to avoid war...??? I think you are naive and a spoof for the worlds No.1 colonialists.....!!!!! WTF!!!
4 days ago @ Antiwar Radio with Sco... - Muhammad Sahimi · 5 replies · +4 points
WRONG, just another corrupt opportunists..!! There is a website with his quotes.... http://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/1049.Elie_... Here is the one at the top of the list,,!!
“The opposite of love is not hate, it's indifference. The opposite of art is not ugliness, it's indifference. The opposite of faith is not heresy, it's indifference. And the opposite of life is not death, it's indifference."
This quote seems harmless enough, but when one looks into Mr. Wiesel's actual actions it becomes very clear he is using a double standard.
Here is another of his quotes:
“There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest.”
Did Wiesel protest the war built on lies and forgeries..?? I don't recall him protesting..... And then there is this:
"Fortunately, however, Bob Woodward did mention Wiesel's appearance at the White House in his 2004 book, Plan of Attack. Ironically, Woodward was writing at a point in time when the invasion was supposedly going well. Thus, his intent in mentioning Wiesel's dramatic performance at the White House was not to criticize the man, but rather to praise him while also offering an honest portrayal of the man's immense power. In doing so, Woodward made it clear that this "war of choice" was as much about Israel as it was about oil.
Woodward stressed that Bush had been wavering about his decision to unleash the dogs of war until he received Wiesel's blessing. Wiesel had told him that Iraq was a "terrorist state and that the moral imperative was for intervention." Israel's security was supposedly at stake. He asked: "In the name of morality, how can we not intervene?" (320)
Woodward concludes: "In the days after, Bush routinely repeated Wiesel's comments." He leaves it to us to fill in the winks and nods that must have gone with that statement, for what Bush was saying in effect was that by launching a proxy war for Israel he was averting another "Holocaust." Colin Powell, apparently referring to our High Priest's influence on Bush, later stated sardonically that the President had relied on "divine guidance" in deciding to go to war, as if the mendacious Wiesel were some kind of a holy man! (Above 3 paragraphs by By Prof. David O'Connell
5-22-9)
And there is this:
Peace isn't possible in evil's face
Rational people must intervene against the likes of Hussein
By Elie Wiesel
The Los Angeles Times
March 11, 2003
Under normal circumstances, I might have joined those peace marchers who, here and abroad, staged public demonstrations against an invasion of Iraq. After all, I have seen enough of the brutality, the ugliness, of war to oppose it heart and soul. Isn't war forever cruel, the ultimate form of violence? It inevitably generates not only loss of innocence but endless sorrow and mourning. How could one not reject it as an option?
And yet, this time I support President Bush's policy of intervention to eradicate international terrorism, which, most civilized nations agree, is the greatest threat facing us today. Bush has placed the Iraqi war into that context; Saddam Hussein is the ruthless leader of a rogue state to be disarmed by whatever means is necessary if he does not comply fully with the United Nations' mandates to disarm. If we fail to do this, we expose ourselves to terrifying consequences.
I certainly didn't begin writing this comment to dump in Wiesel, only to show how the death passion moves people, even the "Saints" of (supposed) moral pillars of our modern moral structure....
LOOK AT WHAT THEY DO............... Wiesel can't claim ignorance..... He is in fact trying to revise history...!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgqblHpjors Just one more abused becoming the abuser.........
Invention