<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>MerryJ1's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.intensedebate.com/users/686925</link>
		<description>Comments by MerryJ1</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Planned Parenthood Releases Graphic Content To 10-Year-Olds For National Condom Week</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/planned-parenthood-releases-graphic-content-to-10-year-olds-for-national-condom-week/#IDComment292348814</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t see any possible motive or explanation for this, other than to turn schoolyards and playgrounds into fishing ponds for pedophiles. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/planned-parenthood-releases-graphic-content-to-10-year-olds-for-national-condom-week/#IDComment292348814</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Dem Schakowsky: Americans Don't Actually Follow Christian Faith  </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/dem-schakowsky-americans-dont-actually-follow-christian-faith/#IDComment292326425</link>
<description>Jan Schakowsky&amp;#039;s husband wrote the gist of the Obama &amp;quot;health care&amp;quot; bill while he was sitting in jail for financial crimes. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/dem-schakowsky-americans-dont-actually-follow-christian-faith/#IDComment292326425</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Alan Dershowitz: Media Matters Could Cost Obama the Election</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/02/13/alan-dershowitz-media-matters-could-cost-obama-the-election/#IDComment292054090</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m stunned that Alan Dershowitz is expressing anger that something &amp;quot;will cost Obama the election&amp;quot; when his concern should be, &amp;quot;What can I do to make sure Obama loses the election?&amp;quot; Promoting classical liberalism is one thing, but rooting for tyranny and central planning is a whole different breed of cat --- and historically, that &amp;quot;cat&amp;quot; usually targets the Jewish community first and foremost..  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/02/13/alan-dershowitz-media-matters-could-cost-obama-the-election/#IDComment292054090</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Alan Dershowitz: Media Matters Could Cost Obama the Election</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/02/13/alan-dershowitz-media-matters-could-cost-obama-the-election/#IDComment292050717</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Denial isn&amp;#039;t just a river in Egypt?&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/02/13/alan-dershowitz-media-matters-could-cost-obama-the-election/#IDComment292050717</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : 16 Members of Congress Funneled Millions to Their Relatives' Employers, Study Finds</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/whall/2012/02/13/16-members-of-congress-funneled-millions-to-their-relatives-employers-study-finds/#IDComment291746959</link>
<description>Different scam, although that doesn&amp;#039;t necessarily mean she doesn&amp;#039;t also use the earmark version of &amp;quot;stuff falling off a truck.&amp;quot; She was reportedly highlighted in the &amp;quot;Throw Them All Out&amp;quot; book for insider trading - she and her husband apparently cleaned up on Visa IPOs, this when there was relevant legislation on the burner. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/whall/2012/02/13/16-members-of-congress-funneled-millions-to-their-relatives-employers-study-finds/#IDComment291746959</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : 16 Members of Congress Funneled Millions to Their Relatives' Employers, Study Finds</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/whall/2012/02/13/16-members-of-congress-funneled-millions-to-their-relatives-employers-study-finds/#IDComment291743134</link>
<description>Now, be fair --- just because they steal, doesn&amp;#039;t mean they lie. :) </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/whall/2012/02/13/16-members-of-congress-funneled-millions-to-their-relatives-employers-study-finds/#IDComment291743134</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Obama Weaponizes DOJ Against Murdoch</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/08/obama-weaponizes-doj-against-murdoch/#IDComment289162967</link>
<description>&amp;quot;The progressives are trying to commit political suicide...&amp;quot; Well, yes, I guess there is a silver lining :) </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/08/obama-weaponizes-doj-against-murdoch/#IDComment289162967</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Obama Weaponizes DOJ Against Murdoch</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/08/obama-weaponizes-doj-against-murdoch/#IDComment288559203</link>
<description>Scary, and incomprehensible that &amp;quot;they&amp;quot; could&amp;#039;ve pulled this off without having lobotomized a majority of the voting population --- unless that&amp;#039;s actually what &amp;quot;they&amp;quot; did do? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/08/obama-weaponizes-doj-against-murdoch/#IDComment288559203</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Obama Weaponizes DOJ Against Murdoch</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/08/obama-weaponizes-doj-against-murdoch/#IDComment288556330</link>
<description>Completely agree, but I&amp;#039;m afraid with all of the bickering among ourselves and the ease with which we allow the corruptocrats of both Parties to demonize and destroy any candidate with the will and the capacity to turn things around, we&amp;#039;re probably in for a long, long, hard slog. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/08/obama-weaponizes-doj-against-murdoch/#IDComment288556330</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Obama Weaponizes DOJ Against Murdoch</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/08/obama-weaponizes-doj-against-murdoch/#IDComment288410509</link>
<description>Yes, for example I received this today in a Patriot Post email (Alexander&amp;rsquo;s Essay &amp;ndash; February 9, 2012)  &amp;ldquo;FBI Terrorist Alert: Beware of those who Reference the Constitution or the Bible&amp;rdquo;  &amp;ldquo;The FBI held a press conference this week on a terrorist alert bulletin, which it sent to every federal, state and local law enforcement agency across the country. Unfortunately, that bulletin continued a trend of &amp;quot;terrorist profiles&amp;quot; issued since Barack Hussein Obama has been in office. This particular alert identified such broad ideological characteristics that it can be construed to include the activities of tens of millions of law-abiding Americans.  The FBI counterterrorism division report concluded that those who believe that our government has exceeded its constitutional limits or are protesting for restoration of constitutional integrity might pose a threat. By that definition, anyone associated with the &amp;quot;Tea Party movement&amp;quot; is suspect  ..&amp;rdquo;  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/08/obama-weaponizes-doj-against-murdoch/#IDComment288410509</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Obama Weaponizes DOJ Against Murdoch</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/08/obama-weaponizes-doj-against-murdoch/#IDComment288267099</link>
<description>Good points. Poor old J. Edgar must be whirling like a dervish at what his beloved Bureau has become. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/08/obama-weaponizes-doj-against-murdoch/#IDComment288267099</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Obama Weaponizes DOJ Against Murdoch</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/08/obama-weaponizes-doj-against-murdoch/#IDComment287948270</link>
<description>No, Murdoch was the top honcho but was not involved in operations. He shut it down when he realized the corruption wasn&amp;#039;t just a couple of bad apples in management, but permeated most of the entirety of it, and he took a loss by just closing it down rather than recouping some of his money by selling the paper and letting someone else worry about it as most moguls would do. Murdoch is not the heavy in that scandal, he did the right thing at substantial cost/loss to himself. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/08/obama-weaponizes-doj-against-murdoch/#IDComment287948270</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Obama Weaponizes DOJ Against Murdoch</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/08/obama-weaponizes-doj-against-murdoch/#IDComment287941367</link>
<description>Actually, J. Edgar Hoover circumvented (some of) Nixon&amp;#039;s attempts to use the DOJ to &amp;quot;get&amp;quot; a foe: When Nixon instructed Hoover to launch a questionable inquiry, Hoover responded &amp;#039;Yes, of course, Mr. President. As soon as you sign off on it...&amp;#039; and Nixon responded &amp;#039;You need my signature? Oh, well, never mind...&amp;#039; (I use apostrophes as quote marks to indicate paraphrasing). I&amp;#039;m going from memory here, and I think but am not positive my source was either &amp;quot;Secrecy and Power&amp;quot; by Richard Gid Powers or &amp;quot;J. Edgar Hoover: The Man and His Secrets&amp;quot; by Curt Gentry. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/08/obama-weaponizes-doj-against-murdoch/#IDComment287941367</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Painter's Anti-Obama Work Sparks Sales, Racism Charges</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2012/02/08/painters-anti-obama-work-sparks-sales-racism-charges/#IDComment287929099</link>
<description>No, but the anti-psychotics might work. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2012/02/08/painters-anti-obama-work-sparks-sales-racism-charges/#IDComment287929099</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Recall Follies: Wisconsin Election Watchdog to Ignore Independently-Provided Evidence of Fraud</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/bhealy/2012/02/07/recall-follies-wisconsin-election-watchdog-to-ignore-independently-provided-evidence-of-fraud/#IDComment286754496</link>
<description>Can anyone claim &amp;quot;standing&amp;quot; to file criminal complaints against the individual GAB members? It looks to me as though every Wisconsin citizen who voted for Governor Walker is being threatened with disenfranchisement by GAB (take your pick) corruption, incompetence and/or arrogance, and that the GAB refusal to take reasonable measures to rectify their gross negligence should pretty firmly establish their &amp;quot;Intent&amp;quot; to defraud those voters. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2012 04:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/bhealy/2012/02/07/recall-follies-wisconsin-election-watchdog-to-ignore-independently-provided-evidence-of-fraud/#IDComment286754496</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Mass Voter Fraud Discovered In Florida</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/mass-voter-fraud-discovered-in-fl/#IDComment282872818</link>
<description>I was drafted by my son to house-sit in Florida and lived there from January 2004 until he sold his house in April, 2005, which included registering and voting in Florida for the 2004 General Election. A year or so ago (2011 or 2010), I received a jury summons from Florida. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 15:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/mass-voter-fraud-discovered-in-fl/#IDComment282872818</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Wisconsin Recall Fraud: Man Finds His Name Four Times on Recall, Claims He Never Signed</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/mtrackers/2012/02/02/wisconsin-recall-fraud-man-finds-his-name-4-times-on-recall-claims-ne-never-signed/#IDComment282540972</link>
<description>Aside from all other considerations, the idea of a brother / son / cousin / whatever &amp;amp; however related --- signing (his) relatives&amp;#039; and/or friends&amp;#039; names to a cause that (he) knows they disagree with, is underhanded and a sordid betrayal. This just really sounds like the type of smarmy &amp;quot;friend&amp;quot; who would glad-hand and commiserate with you, drink your coffee, and bang your wife --- then run around and brag about it. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 06:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/mtrackers/2012/02/02/wisconsin-recall-fraud-man-finds-his-name-4-times-on-recall-claims-ne-never-signed/#IDComment282540972</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Reason.tv: The Foie Gras Fight - Animal Cruelty or Animal Rights Propaganda?</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2012/02/02/reason-tv-the-foie-gras-fight-animal-cruelty-or-animal-rights-propaganda/#IDComment282530486</link>
<description>The S.F. professor is sort-of correct that &amp;quot;people can get addicted&amp;quot; to sugar, and there is withdrawal discomfort if/when a person who uses a lot of sugar abruptly stops consuming it (I found this out the hard way), including headaches, weakness, dizziness and irritability. However, you can &amp;quot;taper off&amp;quot; of a sugar-overuse.&amp;quot;addiction&amp;quot; with no difficulty, and the idea of a sin tax on sugar or, for that matter, a &amp;quot;sugar rehab program,&amp;quot; is just plain silly. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 05:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2012/02/02/reason-tv-the-foie-gras-fight-animal-cruelty-or-animal-rights-propaganda/#IDComment282530486</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Let's Hope the Instincts Romney's Showing in the NBC, Brokaw Controversy Are Used Against Obama</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/30/lets-hope-the-instincts-romneys-showing-in-the-nbc-brokaw-controversy-are-used-against-obama/#IDComment280236542</link>
<description>That&amp;#039;s the &amp;quot;difference of opinion&amp;quot; I referred to. I&amp;#039;m convinced that Newt, warts and all, is the best available, with the definition of &amp;quot;best available&amp;quot; including electable. While both Newt and Romney have a shot at the brass ring, I think it&amp;#039;s doubtful that Santorum could draw many, if any, Independents or cross-over Dems, and Paul would not likely win a majority of Republicans, let alone Independents or Dems.  Neither McCain or Dole were anywhere near the &amp;quot;best available:&amp;quot; Like Romney, they were the establishment darlings (and/or GOP placeholders to assure a Democratic Party victory), who would reliably put the political class - special interests first, country an afterthought, and us &amp;#039;unwashed masses&amp;#039; on the yellow brick road to serfdom. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Feb 2012 00:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/30/lets-hope-the-instincts-romneys-showing-in-the-nbc-brokaw-controversy-are-used-against-obama/#IDComment280236542</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Let's Hope the Instincts Romney's Showing in the NBC, Brokaw Controversy Are Used Against Obama</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/30/lets-hope-the-instincts-romneys-showing-in-the-nbc-brokaw-controversy-are-used-against-obama/#IDComment279689560</link>
<description>You had me scratching my head there for a minute, OriginalDonald (the &amp;quot;cruzin&amp;quot;didn&amp;#039;t ring bells as a username, and I sat there like Mickey-the-Mope running through &amp;quot;cousin,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;b&amp;#039;cause,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;cruising,&amp;quot; etc., until scrolling up to my &amp;quot;Aha!&amp;quot; moment).   Actually, though, Cruzin77 is pretty much on the money. We all want the &amp;quot;perfect guy,&amp;quot; and there&amp;#039;s a real risk of letting the &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot; become the enemy of the &amp;quot;best available.&amp;quot; We may have a difference of opinion on which candidate is the &amp;quot;best available,&amp;quot; but it&amp;#039;s also every bit as important, if not more so, that we replace the congressional (both houses) RINOs with people seriously dedicated to restoring our Constitutional Republic. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/30/lets-hope-the-instincts-romneys-showing-in-the-nbc-brokaw-controversy-are-used-against-obama/#IDComment279689560</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>
