Citizen, I judged from the people I met. And to use a slightly arcane way to put it, the person that had the most influence on me is a descendant from the tribe. She has always been an avid reader. Yes I thought Jewish people were readers to a much larger extend than other groups, but the net teaches me I am wrong.

So, yes. I somehow took the image for the real. But if you are a reader and the Jews you encounter are either friends or bookish friends, it can happen. One day I'll look into the genesis of the image:

http://books.google.de/books?id=i5bkwD1r_y8C&...

Which means: Before you ever look at the wrong done by the sponsored crusading forces, you have always keep in mind that the Palestinians do not want them there. And their claim to the land is a result of that? Which is the racist counter face or your 360degree?

Basically I would agree with you. The problem is that they have only 22% of the land left by now, and that Israel--in spite of it's image cultivation as part of the West--would never dare to do it to any other Western people.

I am much less interested in the settlers, I would be much more interested in an "archeology" of interests behind the whole enterprise.

******************************************************************************
http://themagneszionist.blogspot.com/

A Jew walks into a bar with a parrot on his head

"What can I get for you?" asks the bartender.

The parrot says, "Awk! We are going to remove all the illegal outposts"

The bartender says, "Yeah, I know, you say that every time you come in here. But what can I get for you?"

The parrot says, "Awk! We are going to remove all the illegal outposts"

The bartender says, "Look you said that yesterday and the day before yesterday and the day before that. What can I get for you?"

The parrot says, "Awk! But this time we are going to remove all of them in one day."

The bartender bursts out in uncontrollable laughter, doubles over and drops dead.

The parrot looks down at the Jew and says, "Now can I have a gin and tonic?"

The most amazing thing one encounters is the lacking wit in these ideologues. I'd never thought I would witness that Jewish people can be just as easily propagandized as any other group on earth, maybe even more perfectly.

But then no other group has a similarly convincing narrative: "people will always hate us, they have done so before they will do to eternity", thus they do not really need to consider their actions, as it must lead to heightened suspicion against almost anybody except for other Jews.

It may be a very helpful tale, to accomplish things no matter what others feel or say, but it clearly has it's danger components, as we witness, if it is combined with power and no consideration of others feelings. It can become pretty explosive it feels.

"That being said converts are a minority of Jews living in world"

How do you know? Why are there so many different Jewish features if they ultimately descended from the same people? How did that come about?

You are aware your argument thought to the end is essentially about ethnic purity? Whom does this remind me of?

You should read the standard on the Jewish history of conversion, benshlomo, but then you better ignore it.

http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&tag=mozilla-2...

Wonderful, thanks.

The only way to justify this literal occupation of other people’s lives and land is to make them inhuman.

That's the central point. It accompanies the many words of the ideologues like a shadow, for the observer often the shadow takes over. In what strange ways do people have to knot up their brains to avoid this simple realization?

Did you have troubles with him? Did he not publish something you wrote and what was it. Could you be more specific?

He is retired, and I assume as a man of the military conservative. But that's not what you mean, is it? What political agenda. What is yours? I accept all kind of political agendas. No doubt there are red lines, beyond which I probably too would be suspicious. But than I could tell you why.

I think he is concerned, maybe concerned as an Arabist, that is he may well know a little more about the region, and in specific contexts more than you do? Financial agenda? In what respect? He is retired?

Untermenschen

mention is close to the German pronunciation of Menschen = people/humans, but we spell it differently.

subhumans.

Laurie, I can't listen to that. Are you aware of the special status of Theresienstadt? I really had to stop at that point. He is using the authentic Nazi propaganda at the time. Put another way that is exactly how Theresienstadt was used in Nazi propaganda.

If you want to know about cooperation between Zionists and Nazis read Francis N. Nicosia, he is a leading expert on matters. This is his latest book.

http://books.google.de/books?id=JTtGXWzfD10C&...

Just don't listen to these pied pipers. But strictly it is your choice and I don't care.

I think the real Jim Haygood has left for good.

Sand, I can't respond to your statement about Pat Lang directly, since it is gone at the moment.

I don't care at all what you think about him. Yes he can be harsh occasionally, but if you look closer, you will find out why. I belong to his fans as to Phil's and Adam's.