<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>LanceKant's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.intensedebate.com/users/267408</link>
		<description>Comments by LanceKant</description>
<item>
<title>Defense Tech : Monday Morning Video: Tanks on a Train</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/01/23/monday-morning-video-tanks-on-a-train/#IDComment272226763</link>
<description>The YouTube comments on these videos make my brain hurt.     Apparently everyone&amp;#039;s either convinced we&amp;#039;re going to war (&amp;quot;ww3&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;get ready america&amp;quot;), or that the government&amp;#039;s going to crack down on us (&amp;quot;have fun with obamas regime&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;look at fema preparing&amp;quot;). Also, don&amp;#039;t forget the die-hard Ron Paul supporters (&amp;quot;RP2012&amp;quot;) who believe he&amp;#039;s the only chance of preventing the previous two scenarios. Ironically, he supports domestic military buildup, and a routine redeployment like this is something he&amp;#039;d prefer than an overseas airlift. Not that I&amp;#039;m advocating him (his fans turn me off). </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2012/01/23/monday-morning-video-tanks-on-a-train/#IDComment272226763</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : China Launches its Own GPS Satellites</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/12/29/china-launches-its-own-gps-satellites/#IDComment250861599</link>
<description>Hate to burst your bubble, but Reagan&amp;#039;s policies were fine for the Cold War world, not now, when our biggest military rival also happens to be our biggest economic counterpart. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/12/29/china-launches-its-own-gps-satellites/#IDComment250861599</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : China's Carrier Seen From an Airliner</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/12/02/chinas-carrier-seen-from-an-airliner/#IDComment231983786</link>
<description>Probably on your lame joke. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 3 Dec 2011 04:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/12/02/chinas-carrier-seen-from-an-airliner/#IDComment231983786</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : China's Carrier Gets a New Paint Job</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/11/02/chinas-carrier-gets-a-new-paint-job/#IDComment216024610</link>
<description>How awesome of you to evaluate a newly refurbished aircraft carrier based on looks! The CIA should hire you, because you seem to be able to tell whether something&amp;#039;s good or not by just looking at lo-res pictures of it! </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 23:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/11/02/chinas-carrier-gets-a-new-paint-job/#IDComment216024610</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : NATO Airstrike May Have Hit Gadhafi's Convoy</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/10/20/nato-airstrike-may-have-hit-gadhafis-convoy/#IDComment210123914</link>
<description>Bort, you should be surprised that NATO didn&amp;#039;t kill Gadhafi in the months since the UN resolution. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/10/20/nato-airstrike-may-have-hit-gadhafis-convoy/#IDComment210123914</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Wednesday Aircraft Porn: The Ekranoplan</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/09/27/wednesday-aircraft-porn-the-ekranoplan/#IDComment200149101</link>
<description>Please. Learn some history before making comments like that. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 02:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/09/27/wednesday-aircraft-porn-the-ekranoplan/#IDComment200149101</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Northrop's Advanced Concepts</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/09/20/northrops-advanced-concepts/#IDComment195814404</link>
<description>The first one seriously looks like something out of Star Wars, and this is coming from a Star Wars buff. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/09/20/northrops-advanced-concepts/#IDComment195814404</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Senate Appropriatiors Keep JSF Production Levels Flat</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/09/16/senate-appropriatiors-keep-jsf-production-levels-flat/#IDComment194142801</link>
<description>Epic senator indeed. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/09/16/senate-appropriatiors-keep-jsf-production-levels-flat/#IDComment194142801</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Lockheed's New STOL Airlifter Design</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/09/15/lockheeds-new-stol-airlifter-design/#IDComment194119457</link>
<description>Sorry, that just looks a bit unpractical and... stupid. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/09/15/lockheeds-new-stol-airlifter-design/#IDComment194119457</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : The U.S.' Post 9/11 Weapons Tech </title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/09/09/the-u-s-post-911-weapons-tech/#IDComment191570390</link>
<description>Another mention could be post-9/11 digital camouflage. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Sep 2011 18:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/09/09/the-u-s-post-911-weapons-tech/#IDComment191570390</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : China's "Starter Carrier"</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/08/29/chinas-starter-carrier/#IDComment187934552</link>
<description>Agreed. People dislike a middleman because there&amp;#039;s nothing to argue about then. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 04:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/08/29/chinas-starter-carrier/#IDComment187934552</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Video: F-16s Intercept Russian Bombers</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/08/24/f-16s-intercept-russian-bombers/#IDComment186189643</link>
<description>Wait, how did the Russians get all the way to Dutch airspace? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/08/24/f-16s-intercept-russian-bombers/#IDComment186189643</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : 2,000 Tomahawks Fired in Anger</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/08/04/2000-tomahawks-fired-in-anger/#IDComment180101608</link>
<description>Making a joke like that must make you feel so smart now, huh? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Aug 2011 15:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/08/04/2000-tomahawks-fired-in-anger/#IDComment180101608</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Special Operators' Holographic Maps</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/07/29/special-operators-holographic-maps/#IDComment178348077</link>
<description>I want this for Google Earth. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/07/29/special-operators-holographic-maps/#IDComment178348077</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Was the PLAAF Really Chasing a U-2?</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/07/27/was-the-plaaf-really-chasing-a-u-2/#IDComment177774212</link>
<description>So why did the PLAAF go after a routine US recon run if they knew it was, well, routine? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/07/27/was-the-plaaf-really-chasing-a-u-2/#IDComment177774212</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Chinese Drone to ID Targets for Carrier Killers?</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/07/05/chinas-hale-drone-to-id-targets-for-carrier-killers/#IDComment170124082</link>
<description>Nice generalization bro. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Jul 2011 00:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/07/05/chinas-hale-drone-to-id-targets-for-carrier-killers/#IDComment170124082</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : China's Military Tech 20 Years Behind U.S.'</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/06/08/chinas-military-tech-20-years-behind-u-s/#IDComment160648077</link>
<description>Is the USAF in charge of cyberwarfare? Or does the FBI and/or CIA take command on attacks to America&amp;#039; cyber infrastructure? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Jun 2011 14:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/06/08/chinas-military-tech-20-years-behind-u-s/#IDComment160648077</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Video: F-35's First Ever Air Show Appearance</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/05/24/video-f-35s-first-ever-air-show-a/#IDComment155641689</link>
<description>Top comment on YouTube page:  &amp;quot;I can&amp;#039;t wait to see the fucker on full afterburner pulling straight into vertical.&amp;quot;  I agree. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 14:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/05/24/video-f-35s-first-ever-air-show-a/#IDComment155641689</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : China's Stealth Jet Makes Second Flight</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/04/19/chinas-stealth-jet-makes-second-flight/#IDComment144256198</link>
<description>I laughed at this. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/04/19/chinas-stealth-jet-makes-second-flight/#IDComment144256198</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Russians Moving 'Carrier Killer' Cruiser to Pac Fleet AO</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/03/28/russians-moving-carrier-killer-cruiser-to-pac-fleet-ao/#IDComment138139548</link>
<description>Can&amp;#039;t forget the canoes! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/03/28/russians-moving-carrier-killer-cruiser-to-pac-fleet-ao/#IDComment138139548</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>
