<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>JeffHuber's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.intensedebate.com/users/545952</link>
		<description>Comments by JeffHuber</description>
<item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : Hillary's Dope Deal?</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/11/08/hillarys-dope-deal/#IDComment42560638</link>
<description>Sy Hersh now reports that we&amp;#039;ve had talks with Pakistan&amp;#039;s military.  Curiouser and curiouser.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Nov 2009 13:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/11/08/hillarys-dope-deal/#IDComment42560638</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : Such a Waste of Fine Infantry</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/11/05/such-a-waste-of-fine-infantry/#IDComment42339493</link>
<description>Thanks to all for the great discussion.   Jeff </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 Nov 2009 14:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/11/05/such-a-waste-of-fine-infantry/#IDComment42339493</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : A Manifesto for X Street</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/giraldi/2009/11/04/a-manifesto-for-x-street/#IDComment42123313</link>
<description>Hear, hear! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/giraldi/2009/11/04/a-manifesto-for-x-street/#IDComment42123313</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : 'Twas Brillig in Bananastan</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/11/03/twas-brillig-in-bananastan/#IDComment42035520</link>
<description>Thanks, fed.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/11/03/twas-brillig-in-bananastan/#IDComment42035520</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : So Much for Europe</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/11/04/so-much-for-europe/#IDComment42028518</link>
<description>They&amp;#039;re fed up, as they should be.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/11/04/so-much-for-europe/#IDComment42028518</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : Bob Gates' Bad Bet</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/10/30/bob-gates-bad-bet/#IDComment41364480</link>
<description>No, I dont&amp;#039; think Gates is putting anything personal on the line this time.  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Nov 2009 05:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/10/30/bob-gates-bad-bet/#IDComment41364480</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : Bob Gates' Bad Bet</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/10/30/bob-gates-bad-bet/#IDComment41284217</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s ridiculous.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/10/30/bob-gates-bad-bet/#IDComment41284217</guid>
</item><item>
<title>News From Antiwar.com : Growing Tensions Apparent on Clinton's Pakistan Visit</title>
<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/10/29/growing-tensions-apparent-on-clintons-pakistan-visit/#IDComment41189455</link>
<description>Secretary of Slogans! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/10/29/growing-tensions-apparent-on-clintons-pakistan-visit/#IDComment41189455</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : Alas Afghanistan</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/10/28/alas-afghanistan/#IDComment41080687</link>
<description>Thanks for the link, Alan.   Jeff </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/10/28/alas-afghanistan/#IDComment41080687</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : When the Tough Should Get Going</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/garrison-keillor/2009/10/27/when-the-tough-should-get-going/#IDComment41001669</link>
<description>Thank you, Mr. Keillor.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/garrison-keillor/2009/10/27/when-the-tough-should-get-going/#IDComment41001669</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : Make the World Go Away</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/10/23/make-the-world-go-away/#IDComment40381877</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m sure the cities by the bases will be happy to have their customers back, OVR.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 06:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/10/23/make-the-world-go-away/#IDComment40381877</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : General Treachery</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/10/21/general-treachery/#IDComment39879413</link>
<description>Good point, Andy.   J </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/10/21/general-treachery/#IDComment39879413</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : Saving Face and Losing Lives</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/paul/2009/10/13/saving-face-and-losing-lives/#IDComment38694720</link>
<description>Well put, Congressman.   </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/paul/2009/10/13/saving-face-and-losing-lives/#IDComment38694720</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : McChrystal's Ultimatum</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/10/05/mcchrystals-ultimatum/#IDComment37483038</link>
<description>Geo, thanks for your post. You make excellent points.  Maybe I need to write a piece on the corruption of survival.   </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/10/05/mcchrystals-ultimatum/#IDComment37483038</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : Bitter Fruits of Mideast Wars</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/buchanan/2009/10/01/bitter-fruits-of-mideast-wars/#IDComment36835185</link>
<description>Let me also say, though, that you make superb points in this article.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Oct 2009 12:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/buchanan/2009/10/01/bitter-fruits-of-mideast-wars/#IDComment36835185</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : Bitter Fruits of Mideast Wars</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/buchanan/2009/10/01/bitter-fruits-of-mideast-wars/#IDComment36835067</link>
<description>Not &amp;quot;within a matter of months,&amp;quot; Pat.  Latest intelligence estimates say it would take Iran to 2015 to develop a nuke, assuming they wanted to do so.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Oct 2009 12:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/buchanan/2009/10/01/bitter-fruits-of-mideast-wars/#IDComment36835067</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : McChrystal's Myth</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/09/29/mcchrystals-myth/#IDComment36620886</link>
<description>That&amp;#039;s exactly what I mean, Geo.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/09/29/mcchrystals-myth/#IDComment36620886</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : The Two Faces of Kimberly Kagan</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/vlahos/2009/09/28/two-faces-of-kimberly-kagan/#IDComment36593367</link>
<description>Kim has learned all the wrong lessons, unfortunately.  She needs to look up Sun Tzu&amp;#039;s admonitionthat no nation ever profited from a &amp;quot;long war.&amp;quot;   Keep up the great work, Kelley.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/vlahos/2009/09/28/two-faces-of-kimberly-kagan/#IDComment36593367</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : The Velvet Junta</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/09/24/the-velvet-junta/#IDComment35994833</link>
<description>As I&amp;#039;ve said before, he needs to demand the retirement/resignation letter of everyone in DOD who&amp;#039;s a bird colonel or senior or whose title contains the word &amp;quot;secretary.&amp;quot;  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/09/24/the-velvet-junta/#IDComment35994833</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : The Velvet Junta</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/09/24/the-velvet-junta/#IDComment35897737</link>
<description>Stan the Man&amp;#039;s appearance on 60 Minutes confirms it: we&amp;#039;re under siege by our own military.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/09/24/the-velvet-junta/#IDComment35897737</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>
