en-us http://www.intensedebate.com/users/669068 Comments by GregZ http://us4palin.com/cannibals-in-gop-establishment-employ-tactics-of-the-left/#IDComment276445711 Both Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney mention that the other have invested in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and attacked and made excuses for them doing so, thus attacking Capitalism. For their information Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae are publicly held and publicly traded companies, which are part of the capitalist system. They may be bad investments, but it is not illegal, immoral or prohibited. Instead of attacking Capitalism and Free Markets they should be extolling their merits. If they want to attack, attack Crony Capitalism. Sat, 28 Jan 2012 02:22:13 +0000 http://us4palin.com/cannibals-in-gop-establishment-employ-tactics-of-the-left/#IDComment276445711 http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/01/13/correcting-the-progressive-spin-on-my-defense-of-the-marines/#IDComment266521446 Barack Hussein Obama and his Regime called the actions of marines in a video urinating on dead Taliban deplorable and they were concerned this “atrocity” may wreck peace efforts with the Taliban aimed at ending the decade long war. The Taliban are the US’s enemy. The Obama Regime has since backtracked somewhat when Spokesman Jay Carney said, “The Obama administration is being careful not to prejudge the investigation into US Marines filmed urinating on the bodies of dead Taliban solders. We've seen the video and what it depicts is or what it apparently depicts is reprehensible." Could they have remembered their reaction to the Fort Hood massacre when Obama said in a statement, "We don't know all the answers yet? And I would caution against jumping to conclusions until we have all the facts." As a State Senator, Obama said we must have empathy for the jihadists who attacked this country on 9/11. The Fort Hood shooting was done by an Islamic jihadist Nidal Hasan, regardless of the ridiculous assessment by the DOD, which classified the Fort Hood massacre as "workplace violence." Another example of Obama’s true feeling on the military was his initial statement on Fort Hood. Obama stated my immediate thoughts & prayers were to the wounded & fallen soldiers. Yet, he was clowning around & giving shout outs prior to mentioning the shooting. Obama is an appeaser and shows weakness to the World endangering Americans. As for the marines urinating on the dead Taliban it was bad judgment to do and worse to tape it and show it to the World. We have to remember, these are young men acting out in the heat of battle. And by the way they won that battle. Nevertheless, we are supposed to be better than the Taliban and Al-Qaeda animals. Some people are excusing the marine’s actions with examples of atrocities committed by the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. As the saying goes two wrongs do not make a right. As to what should be done I agree with Allen West on this incident. West said, “The Marines were wrong. Give them a maximum punishment under field grade level Article 15 (non-judicial punishment), place a General Officer level letter of reprimand in their personnel file, and have them in full dress uniform stand before their Battalion, each personally apologize to God, Country, and Corps videotaped and conclude by singing the full US Marine Corps Hymn without a teleprompter. I am afraid the Obama Regime is going to seek the maximum punishment on these marines. Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:56:46 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/01/13/correcting-the-progressive-spin-on-my-defense-of-the-marines/#IDComment266521446 http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/13/when-dissent-isnt-patriotic-how-politico-is-playing-media-matters-game-to-censor-conservatives/#IDComment266519501 Barack Hussein Obama and his Regime called the actions of marines in a video urinating on dead Taliban deplorable and they were concerned this “atrocity” may wreck peace efforts with the Taliban aimed at ending the decade long war. The Taliban are the US’s enemy. The Obama Regime has since backtracked somewhat when Spokesman Jay Carney said, “The Obama administration is being careful not to prejudge the investigation into US Marines filmed urinating on the bodies of dead Taliban solders. We've seen the video and what it depicts is or what it apparently depicts is reprehensible." Could they have remembered their reaction to the Fort Hood massacre when Obama said in a statement, "We don't know all the answers yet? And I would caution against jumping to conclusions until we have all the facts." As a State Senator, Obama said we must have empathy for the jihadists who attacked this country on 9/11. The Fort Hood shooting was done by an Islamic jihadist Nidal Hasan, regardless of the ridiculous assessment by the DOD, which classified the Fort Hood massacre as "workplace violence." Another example of Obama’s true feeling on the military was his initial statement on Fort Hood. Obama stated my immediate thoughts & prayers were to the wounded & fallen soldiers. Yet, he was clowning around & giving shout outs prior to mentioning the shooting. Obama is an appeaser and shows weakness to the World endangering Americans. As for the marines urinating on the dead Taliban it was bad judgment to do and worse to tape it and show it to the World. We have to remember, these are young men acting out in the heat of battle. And by the way they won that battle. Nevertheless, we are supposed to be better than the Taliban and Al-Qaeda animals. Some people are excusing the marine’s actions with examples of atrocities committed by the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. As the saying goes two wrongs do not make a right. As to what should be done I agree with Allen West on this incident. West said, “The Marines were wrong. Give them a maximum punishment under field grade level Article 15 (non-judicial punishment), place a General Officer level letter of reprimand in their personnel file, and have them in full dress uniform stand before their Battalion, each personally apologize to God, Country, and Corps videotaped and conclude by singing the full US Marine Corps Hymn without a teleprompter. I am afraid the Obama Regime is going to seek the maximum punishment on these marines. Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:52:47 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/13/when-dissent-isnt-patriotic-how-politico-is-playing-media-matters-game-to-censor-conservatives/#IDComment266519501 http://bigjournalism.com/driehl/2012/01/14/media-matters-tries-to-stir-controversy-over-loesch-limbaugh-fails/#IDComment266517389 Barack Hussein Obama and his Regime called the actions of marines in a video urinating on dead Taliban deplorable and they were concerned this “atrocity” may wreck peace efforts with the Taliban aimed at ending the decade long war. The Taliban are the US’s enemy. The Obama Regime has since backtracked somewhat when Spokesman Jay Carney said, “The Obama administration is being careful not to prejudge the investigation into US Marines filmed urinating on the bodies of dead Taliban solders. We've seen the video and what it depicts is or what it apparently depicts is reprehensible." Could they have remembered their reaction to the Fort Hood massacre when Obama said in a statement, "We don't know all the answers yet? And I would caution against jumping to conclusions until we have all the facts." As a State Senator, Obama said we must have empathy for the jihadists who attacked this country on 9/11. The Fort Hood shooting was done by an Islamic jihadist Nidal Hasan, regardless of the ridiculous assessment by the DOD, which classified the Fort Hood massacre as "workplace violence." Another example of Obama’s true feeling on the military was his initial statement on Fort Hood. Obama stated my immediate thoughts & prayers were to the wounded & fallen soldiers. Yet, he was clowning around & giving shout outs prior to mentioning the shooting. Obama is an appeaser and shows weakness to the World endangering Americans. As for the marines urinating on the dead Taliban it was bad judgment to do and worse to tape it and show it to the World. We have to remember, these are young men acting out in the heat of battle. And by the way they won that battle. Nevertheless, we are supposed to be better than the Taliban and Al-Qaeda animals. Some people are excusing the marine’s actions with examples of atrocities committed by the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. As the saying goes two wrongs do not make a right. As to what should be done I agree with Allen West on this incident. West said, “The Marines were wrong. Give them a maximum punishment under field grade level Article 15 (non-judicial punishment), place a General Officer level letter of reprimand in their personnel file, and have them in full dress uniform stand before their Battalion, each personally apologize to God, Country, and Corps videotaped and conclude by singing the full US Marine Corps Hymn without a teleprompter. I am afraid the Obama Regime is going to seek the maximum punishment on these marines. Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:48:50 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/driehl/2012/01/14/media-matters-tries-to-stir-controversy-over-loesch-limbaugh-fails/#IDComment266517389 http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/01/13/correcting-the-progressive-spin-on-my-defense-of-the-marines/#IDComment263807099 Dana Loesch supported and campaigned for the rapist Bill Clinton. She says she converted from a liberal to a Conservative after having an epiphany on 9/11. As for the marines urinating on the dead Taliban it was bad judgment to do and worse to tape it and show it to the World. Two wrongs do not make a right. We are supposed to be better than the Taliban and Al-Queda animals. As to what should be done I agree with Allen West on this incident."The Marines were wrong. Give them a maximum punishment under field grade level Article 15 (non-judicial punishment), place a General Officer level letter of reprimand in their personnel file, and have them in full dress uniform stand before their Battalion, each personally apologize to God, Country, and Corps videotaped and conclude by singing the full US Marine Corps Hymn without a teleprompter. Sat, 14 Jan 2012 04:31:55 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/01/13/correcting-the-progressive-spin-on-my-defense-of-the-marines/#IDComment263807099 http://tv.breitbart.com/nbc-news-meghan-mccain-obamas-deserve-small-emoticon-of-privacy/#IDComment259776727 Meghan McLame, The Obama's deserve some small modicum (small amount) of privacy. Why couldn't she just say small amount, is she trying to impress anyone with her "intelligence?" Meghan lends credence to the stereo-type of blondes and intelligence. Then she calls herself a Republican. If anything she is a RINO like her daddy. She is nothing more than a useful idiot to MSNBC and the so-called Mainstream Media, aka. the propaganda wing of the Obama Regime. Mon, 9 Jan 2012 20:37:33 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/nbc-news-meghan-mccain-obamas-deserve-small-emoticon-of-privacy/#IDComment259776727 http://tv.breitbart.com/nbc-news-analyst-oppostion-to-obama-is-racism/#IDComment243780260 Barack Hussein Obama is a Community Agitator. He is a divisive and polarizing figure who pits one group of Americans against another. Obama is a BULLY and a LIAR, who uses scare tactics and threats against the American people. His policies and rhetoric shows weakness to the World, which endangers America. He likes to call himself a progressive; however that is an inaccurate description of him. Obama is a Statist, and oppressor or tyrant. He used water as a means to bribe two representatives from California for their votes on healthcare, which was a despicable act that dictators do to their people. Wed, 21 Dec 2011 19:09:47 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/nbc-news-analyst-oppostion-to-obama-is-racism/#IDComment243780260 http://biggovernment.com/sbandsw/2011/12/15/the-tea-is-brewed-gateway-grassroots-initiative/#IDComment242185332 My Take on the “New” Tea Party There is a new Tea Party in town, The Gateway Grassroots Initiative. They claim they are a “harder, better, faster and stronger conservative grassroots movement.” What does that mean? Sounds like an ego problem. The Tea Party represents Patriotic Americans who are concerned about their country. Tea Party people want their leaders to follow the Constitution; they want limited Government; less taxes and for Government to be fiscally responsible. Therefore, anyone or any Candidate who possess those attributes can call themselves a Tea Party Patriot. “Gateway Grassroots Initiative is built around action items (T.I.P.s) with the purpose of promoting conservatism. Their mission is to attract, educate, organize, and mobilize fellow Gateway area citizens to secure a culture consistent with our three core values of fiscal responsibility, constitutionally limited government, and free markets.” Wasn’t that what the Tea Party stands for? “Gateway Grassroots Initiative is formed around the ideal that every American citizen has the personal privilege and responsibility of becoming a “minuteman” for their country in various ways. Many are well on their way to doing this, through their blogs, to running for office, becoming a precinct captain, running for their local school board, organizing petitions, fighting for voter integrity. However, Gateway Grassroots Initiative is uninterested in endorsing or singularly promoting candidates, instead choosing to focus on ideas.” GGI calls for “minutemen” to run for public office, yet the GGI will not promote or help them get elected. So, how is that helping the Conservative movement? “Gateway Grassroots Initiative wants to court the liberal arts, entertainment, and Hollywood crowd. We intend to use pop culture as an ally in this fight.” How does courting the liberal arts, entertainment, and Hollywood crowd going to help the Conservative movement? If anything, the education needs to start with the children before they enter public schools, aka. indoctrination centers. There is no need to court anyone. It is better to stand on principles and have the people come to you. The GGI's first two initiatives are 1, starting a book club and 2, a blanket drive to keep people warm. OK? How does starting a book club or conducting a blanket drive help Constitutional, limited government, fiscally responsible candidates get elected to office or the Conservative movement? Wouldn’t it be better to have the right people in office so people have jobs and enough money to buy their own blankets? The goal of the Tea Party should be to support and help elect Conservative candidates who want limited government and who will follow the Constitution. Otherwise, what’s the point? In order to change the direction this country is headed we need to elect Conservative candidates. Tue, 20 Dec 2011 01:01:24 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/sbandsw/2011/12/15/the-tea-is-brewed-gateway-grassroots-initiative/#IDComment242185332 http://tv.breitbart.com/jake-tapper-presses-wh-on-bidens-taliban-is-not-our-enemy-remark/#IDComment242177555 Joe Biden does not think the Taliban is our enemy, NO, it's the Tea Party. Vice President Joe Biden: “The Tea Party Republicans are acting like ‘Terrorists.’” VP Joe Biden: “This is a different kind of fight. This is a fight for the existence of organized labor. You are the only folks keeping the barbarians [Tea Party] at the gate. That’s why they want you so bad.” Tue, 20 Dec 2011 00:48:47 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/jake-tapper-presses-wh-on-bidens-taliban-is-not-our-enemy-remark/#IDComment242177555 http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236114725 Beck is NOT calling the Tea Party racist. What he is saying IS there is NO difference between Newt Gingrich and Barack Hussein Obama. Therefore, if you vote for Newt it might be because of his race. Mon, 12 Dec 2011 00:02:09 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236114725 http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-hammers-wapo-in-dana-loesch-interview/#IDComment231396944 If you do not want to read the information, don't read it. Sometimes you can get the message out short and sweet, but other times it takes longer to explain what is going on. Again, if you think it's too long, don't read it. Fri, 2 Dec 2011 00:53:37 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-hammers-wapo-in-dana-loesch-interview/#IDComment231396944 http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-hammers-wapo-in-dana-loesch-interview/#IDComment230589778 In response to the video on Global Warming with Nancy Pelosi Newt says, it (making the video) was the dumbest thing he has ever done. However, he did not change his position on Global Warming, he just said making the video was a mistake. I guess he was concerned with having evidence of his position on the topic, because it makes it difficult to flip-flop on the issue. What I would like to find out from him regarding the video is how much was he paid to do it and who paid him. Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:25:50 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-hammers-wapo-in-dana-loesch-interview/#IDComment230589778 http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-hammers-wapo-in-dana-loesch-interview/#IDComment230586404 Newt and the Mandate On May 15, 2011 Newt Gingrich appeared on Meet the Press with David Gregory and stated, “I am against Obamacare,” but then contradicts himself stating he supports a mandate to purchase health insurance. Gingrich said, “I agree that all of us have a responsibility to pay--help pay for health care," and added, "I've said consistently we ought to have some requirement that you either have health insurance or you post a bond ..." Gingrich also admitted that his proposal is a "variation" of the individual mandate, a key component of the Obamacare legislation President Obama signed into law in 2010. Gingrich’s mandate is better than Obama’s mandate because Obama’s plan basically is trying to replace the entire insurance system, creating state exchanges, building a Washington-based model, creating a federal system. Newt went on to state, “There are an amazing amount of people who think they ought to be given healthcare. So, a large amount of people earning $75,000 a year don’t buy health insurance, because they want to buy a second house or a better car or want to go on vacation and you and I and everybody else picking up for them. I don’t think having a free-rider system in health is any more appropriate than having a free ride in any other part of our society.” David Gregory brought up the fact when Gingrich was on Meet the Press in October 1993, Gingrich said: “I am for people, individuals -- exactly like automobile insurance -- individuals having health insurance and being required to have health insurance. And I am prepared to vote for a voucher system which will give individuals, on a sliding scale, a government subsidy so we insure that everyone as individuals have health insurance.” Is Newt saying everyone now needs to purchase auto insurance, even those who do not have a car and do not drive? Newt Gingrich is concerned with people who have no health insurance showing up for treatment at a hospital. What is wrong with giving the people who receive treatment a bill for services? He did not mention that insurance companies have an extra charge in people’s health insurance premiums to cover people who do not have insurance. Will the insurance companies reduce their premiums then? There is a mandate that everyone who drives and has a vehicle need to purchase liability insurance. That insurance is to protect the other driver, not necessarily the owner of the insurance. Nevertheless, they may not have enough insurance, therefore the insurance companies offer underinsured insurance. However, you must purchase uninsured motorist coverage in order to get the underinsured coverage. Why is that? Could it be the insurance company wants to make more money off of the policy holders? There are people who claim an individual mandate to purchase health insurance is Constitutional and people should be forced to purchase health insurance, because sometime in everyone’s life they will need healthcare. People may or may not need healthcare throughout their life, however if they do receive treatment it is their responsibility to pay for their treatment. Newt calls for an individual mandate, wherein people would be forced to purchase healthcare insurance or post a bond to cover possible future healthcare treatment. A mandate is a mandate, whether it is from the Federal Government or the States. Those people who favor the mandate justify it saying sometime in everyone’s life they will need healthcare. People definitely have to eat. When people go to a restaurant they eat their meal and then pay for the food plus a tip for service. Therefore, using their logic should people be required to prepay for the food they will consume in the future? Of course not, the same should hold true for health insurance. Newt stated, “I don’t think having a free-rider system in health is any more appropriate than having a free ride in any other part of our society,” yet he says he would issue vouchers to people who could not afford it (“free-riders”) so everyone would have health insurance. What? Wouldn’t those people receiving the subsidies be considered “free-riders?” People should buy what they want to buy and not have it forced on them by Government. People need to be taught to be self reliant, responsible and not dependent on Government. If people receive goods or services, give them a bill and have them pay for it. Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:21:18 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-hammers-wapo-in-dana-loesch-interview/#IDComment230586404 http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-hammers-wapo-in-dana-loesch-interview/#IDComment230585724 Newt is not a Conservative. No Newt for President Sean Hannity has said the country needs to elect a true Ronald Reagan conservative to the office of the President. Then he mentions Newt Gingrich should run for President. I do not understand the contradiction, because Newt is not a true Reagan conservative. Newt says the United States is a center right country and the tea party movement shows the American people are not happy with Washington. Newt, tell us something we don’t already know. The American people are waking up to the radical agenda of the Obama administration and the Democrats/Statists. Common Sense Conservatism is rising again and the Statist’s day started coming in November. Bob Dole/Dull said it was his turn to run for President and we got 4 more years of the rapist Bill Clinton. Then it was John McCain’s “turn” and we ended up with Barack Hussein Obama. The following observations and questions are the reason I do not believe Newt Gingrich is a real common sense Reagan conservative Republican espoused by Hannity. Gary Gill was running against Missouri’s 3rd District Democrat Representative Dick Gephardt and he was leading in the polls until Newt praised Gephardt. Gill ended up losing the election. Newt made the Contract with America that helped the Republicans win the US House in 1994. What did the Republicans do after they won the US House in 1994? What was enacted? Did they follow through on the contract? No. In 2005 he teamed up with Hillary Clinton on National Healthcare and claimed she would be a formidable candidate for President. He did a Climate Change commercial with Pelosi and teamed up with Sharpton on education. Newt backed Dede Scozzafava, another RINO, in the New York Congressional race. Newt was on Greta and commented to her, “You strengthen yourself by attracting more people than by driving them away,” implying that you must compromise your conservative principles in order to expand the party. I believe you stand on conservative principles & let the people come to you. Newt is another crony capitalist as he is a member of GE's healthymagination advisory board. Newt supports an individual mandate for healthcare, i.e. he supports Obamacare. Above all, he stated the Era of Reagan Conservatism is over. He is positioning himself to run for President as a middle of the roader, and is being too cute and disingenuous when he is asked about running for President and gives evasive answers. Now he is in. Newt is out for Newt. He is not a true conservative and this country does not need him as President. Before Hannity or anyone else lends too much support to Newt, Newt should have him explain his reasoning for his actions. Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:20:20 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-hammers-wapo-in-dana-loesch-interview/#IDComment230585724 http://tv.breitbart.com/allen-west-to-herman-cain-move-on/#IDComment230579544 Allen West thinks Herman Cain should move on from the Presidential race.I thought the Iowa Caucus was in January. And then the New Hampshire primary etc. I did not know the election was already decided. If I recall during the 2008 election Hillary Clinton and Rudy Guilianni were the front runners at this time. However, I know they were not the final nominees. Barack Hussein Obama has a history of knocking out his opposition with scandals, whether true or not. So let's not be in such a hurry to dispose of Herman Cain. Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:11:37 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/allen-west-to-herman-cain-move-on/#IDComment230579544 http://biggovernment.com/jhart/2011/11/30/sherrod-brown-smears-big-labors-critics-as-mccarthyists/#IDComment230577059 Joseph McCarthy was vindicated. There were Communists in politics and Hollywood and still are. Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:08:23 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/jhart/2011/11/30/sherrod-brown-smears-big-labors-critics-as-mccarthyists/#IDComment230577059 http://tv.breitbart.com/nascar-crowd-boos-michalle-obama/#IDComment226758668 How am I a Socialist and who is the one Republican? Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:39:31 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/nascar-crowd-boos-michalle-obama/#IDComment226758668 http://tv.breitbart.com/nascar-crowd-boos-michalle-obama/#IDComment225049994 Obama and the Military Do not believe what Barack Hussein Obama says, or what he reads from the teleprompter, when it comes to his true beliefs of the military, look at his actions. Obama says he cares about the military. Can you say hypocrite or phony? Obama wasn’t going to pay the troops if there was a Government shutdown; instead, he was going to use the military as pawns or a shield for political reasons. On 4/7/2011, he signed a memo stating if there was a Government shutdown the troops would have their payments delayed, contrary to what was allowed in the past by other Presidents. Obama floated the idea that military personnel wounded in battle should have their private medical insurance pay for their medical bills. The Obama Regime prosecuted the Navy Seals for a bogus claim of abuse by a terrorist/jihadist. Then it was learned during Memorial Day Weekend, 2011 that Obama and his Regime want to cut military spending, including pay and health benefits to the soldiers, because he wants to be fiscally responsible. Of course he does, how else do you think he is going to get the billions to give to the Muslim Brotherhood and the Egyptian Nazis? Now, he is using the threat of military cuts against the Super-Committee. There shouldn't even be a Super-committee, because it may be unconstitutional. The Super-committee combines the House and the Senate and I do not believe they can do that without amending the Constitution. More phony OPTICS. At the White House, Obama announced that Retired Army General Stanley McChrystal will join the First Lady Michelle Obama and Dr. Jill Biden to lead a program in support of military families dubbed “Joining Forces.” He has Michelle Obama and Jill Biden doing commercials about the American people supporting our troops. Let’s see, Obama has cut funding for the military in the past, but now he is launching a national initiative supporting military families. Let's not forget Bill O'Reilly's Super-bowl (Super-dud) interview with Obama when O’Reilly asks him, "What's the worst part of the job?" Obama said the worst part of the job is he has to wear a jacket on Super Bowl Sunday and being in the bubble, with eyes constantly on him, where he is not able to have a spontaneous conversation with someone. A pathetic and pitiful response. I would think it would be writing a letter of condolence to the family of a fallen soldier or sending soldiers in harms way. Then again, what do you expect from a coming from a narcissistic elitist Community Agitator? This man is DESPICABLE. After the death of Osama Bin Laden Obama gave a speech from the teleprompter and said, “These efforts weigh on me every time I, as Commander-in-Chief, have to sign a letter to a family that has lost a loved one, or look into the eyes of a service member who’s been gravely wounded." Of course he read that; after all, Obama is running for reelection. Obama’s wining, spontaneous statement shows his true feelings about the military. Our soldiers should be paid on time and soldiers who served in the military should have the best medical care provided to them as a benefit for serving and protecting this great country. Thanks to everyone who served and is serving in our military. Mon, 21 Nov 2011 07:28:19 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/nascar-crowd-boos-michalle-obama/#IDComment225049994 http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/11/09/anonymous-hacks-into-st-louis-mayors-website-after-he-asks-ows-to-follow-the-law/#IDComment224581457 The report of the black mob of violence against an elderly white male that Mayor Slay witnessed was also sanitized. Mayor Slay, his police driver, and the media did not mention the groups race. Mayor Slay was not much help to the victim. It sounds to me from the interview that Slay and his police driver just witnessed the attack and took no kind of action. What is wrong with that picture? The policeman should be armed and they do have access to a radio as well as their cell phones. So, why did they not take aggressive action to go after the perpetrators? Remember, Slay wants City Control over the police department. Is this the type of protection the citizens can expect if they do get control of the STLPD? Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:32:38 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/11/09/anonymous-hacks-into-st-louis-mayors-website-after-he-asks-ows-to-follow-the-law/#IDComment224581457 http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/11/18/why-did-it-take-media-10-days-to-report-a-sexual-assault-at-occupystl/#IDComment224580968 The report of the black mob of violence against an elderly white male that Mayor Slay witnessed was also sanitized. Mayor Slay, his police driver, and the media did not mention the groups race. Mayor Slay was not much help to the victim. It sounds to me from the interview that Slay and his police driver just witnessed the attack and took no kind of action. What is wrong with that picture? The policeman should be armed and they do have access to a radio as well as their cell phones. So, why did they not take aggressive action to go after the perpetrators? Remember, Slay wants City Control over the police department. Is this the type of protection the citizens can expect if they do get control of the STLPD? Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:30:57 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/11/18/why-did-it-take-media-10-days-to-report-a-sexual-assault-at-occupystl/#IDComment224580968