en-us http://www.intensedebate.com/users/327562 Comments by Dooney http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/07/beck-site-attacks-sarah-palin-over-trig-article-writer-calls-palin-supporter-whore/#IDComment286605999 Excellent comments, ladykrystyna -- about which, I agree completely. The Palin site mentioned and those associated with it are not in any way pure nor admirable in their online behaviors toward others. That key point -- that they harass others and otherwise "agitate" a personality cult, in my view (otherwise, what is it) -- is so often suppressed by others as to make the Palin site and those related to it appear guiltless, like angelic victims of some big, bad "get Sarah" effort, an effort that does not exist but which is shown to exist by framing any comments about Palin in any way, extreme or aimless, to be representation of that "get Sarah" effort. In other words, they play the victim card well and it eventually boils over for those they target (and that, apparently, is what Master Trolling wants, to get those they target to just go ugly like this hapless writer has on twitter). I don't respect any involved there. Palin is well known to take a simple, direct question and make it immensely and in a cascade of speech monopoly, about herself eventually. It's simply irritating to many. But to the Palin folks, you aren't allowed to differ. I call that a cult just like the Obama folk are engaged in and the rest of us don't care for it from anyone in politics. I also don't find Palin conservative but that's another story and certainly Gingrich isn't. AND SO, Beck makes another easy target. Unfortunately. Tue, 7 Feb 2012 23:57:15 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/07/beck-site-attacks-sarah-palin-over-trig-article-writer-calls-palin-supporter-whore/#IDComment286605999 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2012/01/08/white-house-threw-alice-in-wonderland-party-kept-press-in-the-dark/#IDComment259652059 I just love the photos of all the children of military personnel...uhh, wait, what? There AREN'T any photos of "them"? Just photos of The Mad Hatter and his companions? Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:36:34 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2012/01/08/white-house-threw-alice-in-wonderland-party-kept-press-in-the-dark/#IDComment259652059 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/09/johnny-depp-gate-why-didnt-disney-promote-a-white-house-party-surrounding-an-upcoming-film/#IDComment259646464 Well, second time my modest comment won't post, so I don't know how at this point to respond...the response does seem obvious to me, though, as to the why's of this story being covered-up. Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:29:22 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/09/johnny-depp-gate-why-didnt-disney-promote-a-white-house-party-surrounding-an-upcoming-film/#IDComment259646464 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/09/johnny-depp-gate-why-didnt-disney-promote-a-white-house-party-surrounding-an-upcoming-film/#IDComment259645720 I think it might be due to the inevitable public assumption that there was The Mad Hatter in the White House with his Wookie by his side. Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:28:21 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/09/johnny-depp-gate-why-didnt-disney-promote-a-white-house-party-surrounding-an-upcoming-film/#IDComment259645720 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/09/johnny-depp-gate-why-didnt-disney-promote-a-white-house-party-surrounding-an-upcoming-film/#IDComment259644460 Now, if media has any credibility, any at all, they'll air the stories and possible photos from those many Wednesday night cocktail parties the Obamas have had in the President's residence. I bet they won't. Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:26:41 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/09/johnny-depp-gate-why-didnt-disney-promote-a-white-house-party-surrounding-an-upcoming-film/#IDComment259644460 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/09/johnny-depp-gate-why-didnt-disney-promote-a-white-house-party-surrounding-an-upcoming-film/#IDComment259642770 The obvious, however: the Bush family would NOT have done something like this. I think the extent of their dubious partying was their Cinco de Mayo event completed in the South of the Border theme with everyone minding their p's-and-q's amidst the costumery. Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:24:50 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/09/johnny-depp-gate-why-didnt-disney-promote-a-white-house-party-surrounding-an-upcoming-film/#IDComment259642770 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/09/johnny-depp-gate-why-didnt-disney-promote-a-white-house-party-surrounding-an-upcoming-film/#IDComment259641136 An afterthought: the obvious conclusion by the public, though, in recognizing The Mad Hatter as being White House residential would have been the eventual perspective. Maybe that had something to do with wanting to keep this Mad-Hatter-In-Chief with his giant Wookie Lobsterhound 'quiet'. Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:22:56 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/09/johnny-depp-gate-why-didnt-disney-promote-a-white-house-party-surrounding-an-upcoming-film/#IDComment259641136 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/09/johnny-depp-gate-why-didnt-disney-promote-a-white-house-party-surrounding-an-upcoming-film/#IDComment259639313 [Begin Quote] According to news reports and Google, Disney did next to nothing to play this event up. Why? Occam’s Razor. I think Disney’s a studio run by left-wing partisans who memory-holed the party for the same reasons I suspect the MSM did — to protect Obama from a public relations hit, especially one during the crucial days leading up to a crucial ObamaCare vote. [End Quote] That'd be my conclusiion, too, stated there, that Quote above, your post. Disney IS run by "left-wing partisans" and whatever their somewhat-conservative public profile WAS at some PAST time, it was merely for show: to lend credibility and appeal to it's animation and other features. But as anyone who works there knows, the place is as left-wing as they come, and, the place will quickly penalize and punish anyone who they so much as suspect is not on board with the left-wingism. In other words, Disney has a left-wing partisan culture. Who "runs" it has created if not demanded such and let no one assume that they don't. Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:20:36 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/09/johnny-depp-gate-why-didnt-disney-promote-a-white-house-party-surrounding-an-upcoming-film/#IDComment259639313 http://biggovernment.com/pschweizer/2011/11/21/why-doesnt-john-kerry-put-his-investments-into-a-blind-trust/#IDComment225145075 Use of a "blind trust" -- especially by politicians while in public office -- is a smokescreen BECAUSE it can be "managed" by whomever they establish to manage it, such as (even) a spouse, a silent partner, whomever. It merely grants the appearance of benefiting "blindly" from investments and other financial property, it does not guarantee that anyone is actually not involved with what's taking place via the "blind trust." And, in John Kerry's case, he'd have to be someone other than he actually is to even appear to be honorable with his connections and other hoodwinks from the Senate or otherwise. Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:27:24 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/pschweizer/2011/11/21/why-doesnt-john-kerry-put-his-investments-into-a-blind-trust/#IDComment225145075 http://bigpeace.com/phair/2011/11/16/the-u-s-armed-forces-are-apparently-okay-with-occupywallstreet/#IDComment223296015 @ nm690 - However, doesn't it make you a tad uncomfortable that it's being represented to the contrary (as the opposite of what you know firsthand as you state there). Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:14:25 +0000 http://bigpeace.com/phair/2011/11/16/the-u-s-armed-forces-are-apparently-okay-with-occupywallstreet/#IDComment223296015 http://bigpeace.com/phair/2011/11/16/the-u-s-armed-forces-are-apparently-okay-with-occupywallstreet/#IDComment223295508 I am not.at.all.pleased with the New Age Gay Rage Muslim Embracing "new" Army personality. Not.at.all.pleased. One of my hunches about the why's involved in this "change" is that Barack Obama wants to inhibit the "all volunteer Army" -- less attractive to capable volunteers, in other words. Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:12:52 +0000 http://bigpeace.com/phair/2011/11/16/the-u-s-armed-forces-are-apparently-okay-with-occupywallstreet/#IDComment223295508 http://bigpeace.com/phair/2011/11/16/the-u-s-armed-forces-are-apparently-okay-with-occupywallstreet/#IDComment223295122 [Quote] What this all means is that the U.S. Armed Forces and government apparently see nothing wrong with an avowed group of anarchists and communists who have openly aligned with the Arab Spring [End Quote]. Apparently, the Obama adminstration's "change" of the U.S. has included implementing "The Men Who Stare At Goats" cultural effects on the Army. It seems that George Clooney didn't portray a fictional character after all -- it was mere training material for the actual Obama-Change plans. Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:11:37 +0000 http://bigpeace.com/phair/2011/11/16/the-u-s-armed-forces-are-apparently-okay-with-occupywallstreet/#IDComment223295122 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9QSS6680&show_article=1#IDComment218981859 Whenever I consider the Earth as it is, suspended here in infinite space, with other objects moving to and from as they are and not destroying our planet, I thank God. And if there is nothing else to convince others that God exists, consider this, that we are, indeed, suspended as we are and yet have persisted here as a planet all these considerable centuries. If you don't recognize the miraculous in that, then allow us who do a moment to pause and thank God for His love and protection of us all. I could just as easily thank Jupiter for attracting many an object away from our planet, but then, God made (and manages) Jupiter, too. :) Wed, 9 Nov 2011 00:43:20 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9QSS6680&show_article=1#IDComment218981859 http://biggovernment.com/jpollak/2011/10/25/barack-obama-led-occupychicago-circa-1988/#IDComment212479891 And keep in mind that the majority of media corporation CEOs and controlling interests still fawn over and about Obama. He calls them his "stockholders" and they're still throwing money at him for re-election. This has a great deal to do with how information both in general and specifically is presented to the public especially in broadcasting and on the internet. Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:28:03 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/jpollak/2011/10/25/barack-obama-led-occupychicago-circa-1988/#IDComment212479891 http://biggovernment.com/jpollak/2011/10/25/barack-obama-led-occupychicago-circa-1988/#IDComment212478757 He really is simply a hustler of the most corrupt kind. One who uses the sweet-act and seductive voice performances to influence gullible and impressionable (and other corrupt) people. He's still nothing more than a rotten hustler, just happens to be being paid to do his hustle by very corrupt people with a lot of money and there should be no wonder why they have it. Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:23:24 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/jpollak/2011/10/25/barack-obama-led-occupychicago-circa-1988/#IDComment212478757 http://biggovernment.com/jpollak/2011/10/25/barack-obama-led-occupychicago-circa-1988/#IDComment212477694 This WAS available as information to the public during the 2008 election. Except that anyone who mentioned it anywhere on the internet was ridiculed, their sites and accounts hacked, gossip was spread about them online as elsewhere, they were greatly maligned and attacked and it wasn't just the Left who did so. There was a lot of revealing information about Barack Obama's corruption and Marxist acts and beliefs available prior to him being elected, but, when it was mentioned by anyone, they were destroyed, not him. The sites where a lot of this informatioin was gathered and available were ridiculed also, as being "looney" sites and their owners "nuts" and things of that nature. It was this spectacle that Obama both encouraged, led and participated in (this post here and now) that resulted in the eventual housing and economy implosion. Obama and his Communist kind in Chicago threated Citi with "bad public relations" (that they'd be ruined in the street by people gossiping bad gossip about them) IF Citi did NOT relent and issue home mortgages based upon race and not based upon credit worthiness. Thus began the soon-widespread practice of coercion upon lending institutions to issue non-credit-worthy home loans to just about anyone who claimed race as qualification for a loan. This was the same process of threat that they applied later to anyone who attempted to share the information about them (about Obama and associates, including ACORN, SEIU, the Communist/Marxist crime syndicate, etc.) leading up to the election in 2008. Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:19:16 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/jpollak/2011/10/25/barack-obama-led-occupychicago-circa-1988/#IDComment212477694 http://biggovernment.com/jpollak/2011/10/25/barack-obama-led-occupychicago-circa-1988/#IDComment212475840 This is news about Sonoma County, CA. That means, Nancy Pelosi and husband don't want the illegal aliens they employ there to be deported. The Left's seat of vineyards in Sonoma County is funding a lot of the drech, including Obama. They want to continue employing illegal aliens in these vineyards because they get slave-labor at little cost to them and then they 'order' law enforcement to look the other way. Sonoma County, CA, though this also applies to other areas in agriculture in CA and other states, like Florida and North Carolina. Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:11:56 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/jpollak/2011/10/25/barack-obama-led-occupychicago-circa-1988/#IDComment212475840 http://bigjournalism.com/wthuston/2011/10/24/media-tries-to-make-rick-perry-a-birther-after-failed-racist-smear/#IDComment211658273 I want to see Obama and his entire crew hounded out of the U.S.A. altogether - my most radical of wishes, which I realize is hardly likely - but certainly out of the Executive Branch. I also would like to see *certain people* among the so-called Right knock off this name-calling about people who try to investigate or comment about the many informational and ethical inconsistencies that characterize Barack Obama. This issue has to be the least of Rick Perry's liabilities, this attempt by Leftmedia to smear him (but so would any on the Right as they have Donal Trump for his complaints along these lines). The goal is to defeat Obama in 2012 and thereafter -- he's not going away, I fear, from our nation and I have concluded that even when he's out of the White House, that we the rest of us will have to contend with his corruption from the lecture circuit and other Leftmedia promotions in the decade to come. Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:14:50 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/wthuston/2011/10/24/media-tries-to-make-rick-perry-a-birther-after-failed-racist-smear/#IDComment211658273 http://bigjournalism.com/wthuston/2011/10/24/media-tries-to-make-rick-perry-a-birther-after-failed-racist-smear/#IDComment211655857 "The birth of birtherism itself" pointing at Hillary Clinton just doesn't fly in reality. It flies as political tool and propaganda and/or media workaround, perhaps, but not as to reality. In reality, the requirement in the Constitution as to President (must be "natural born citizen" among other reqs.) is not clearly defined and certainly not defined at all in the Constitution. If born in Hawaii -- what we're told -- as to Obama, he was not born to two parents who were U.S. citizens and that is what has been INTERPRETED as being who and what a "natural born citizen" is. Instead, legalize cites "the two kinds of citizens" as being "naturalized and born in the U.S." and demands that sums up all anyone need be (the latter, born in the U.S. without regard to parentage) in order to qualify for the Presidency. Yet that avoids acknowledging the Constitutional "additional requirement" of being "natural born" AS a citizen. AND, there have been many legal decisions over the years, even by the Supreme Court (though not as to the Presidential qualifications specifically) that "natural born" as a citizen is interpreted as meaning both born in the U.S. AND born to two parents who were/are U.S. citizens. So, until or unless the Supreme Court makes some clear ruling as to the definition of what "natural born citizen" actually means IN REGARDS THE QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE PRESIDENCY -- because it's clearly an odd and specific addition in the document, hardly written into it by happenstance or casual accident -- then the argument will continue: just what does the requirement for the Presidency mean when it 's said that you must be a citizen, a "natural born citizen". Immigration attorneys and angry Libertarians demand that it means ONLY "born in the U.S." without regard for parents' classifications (which would accommodate a child born in the U.S. to illegal alien parents as being "qualified" for the Presidency by their demand, and this runs contrary to the intent of the Founding Fathers, that no one would occupy the Presidency who had "divided loyalties" or not sole loyalty to the U.S. but to another or other countries, additionally -- and we see this taking place today with Barack Obama, for example). And Rick Perry merely stated that he didn't know about Obama's birthplace, certificate, whatever, but acknowledged he's been elected and to Perry, that means that's the end of it (and that is the same response to this issue that many a Republican Senator has stated). NOW we're told as Republicans that we must ignore this situation (or we're ridiculed for raising it), that it isn't Congress' place to take action on this issue while, in fact, it is, if anyone is to (despite GOP Rep. Lee from Utah recently saying otherwise). It may be POLITICALLY "unhelpful" to the GOP pending win in 2012 to raise the issue, but I'll tell you what is certainly damaging to the Right and that is this incessant name-calling and ridicule of anyone who raises these credible complaints. If you don't find this a worthwhile issue, ignore it. But stop ridiculing anyone who does consider it important. Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:12:00 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/wthuston/2011/10/24/media-tries-to-make-rick-perry-a-birther-after-failed-racist-smear/#IDComment211655857 http://biggovernment.com/lstranahan/2011/10/10/meet-the-anarchist-leaders-behind-the-leaderless-occupy-movement-part-one-lisa-fithian/#IDComment205660929 Exposing the reality of who is responsible (Lisa Fithian, in this case, with her record of similar antisocial behaviors and projects) is not a case of 'attack(ing) their character'... I'm grateful for this expose by "Lee". The American public obviously isn't getting the real picture of what's taking place and who is involved. Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:59:40 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/lstranahan/2011/10/10/meet-the-anarchist-leaders-behind-the-leaderless-occupy-movement-part-one-lisa-fithian/#IDComment205660929